Further to the right: Uncertainty, political polarization and the American “Tea Party” movement

References

• Abramowitz, A. I. (2012). Grand old Tea Party: Patisan polarization and the rise of the Tea Party Movement. In L.Rosenthal & C.Trost (Eds.), Steep: The precipitous rise of the Tea Party (pp. 195–211). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identification, self-categorization and social influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 195–228.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and self-categorization. In J. F.Dovidio, M.Hewstone, P.Glick, & V. M.Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 179–193). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, D., Wetherell, M. S., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Crano, W. D., & Seyranian, V. (2009). How minorities prevail: The context/comparison-leniency contract model. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 335–363.
   Google Scholar
• David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion. The ingroup minority in intragroup and intergroup con-texts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1995). Me, us and them: Political identification and the third-person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 195–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Perceptions of a media campaign: The role of social identity and the changing intergroup context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardikiotis, A. (2008). Group distinctiveness, political identification, and the third-person effect: Perceptions of a political campaign in the 2004 Greek National Election. Media Psychology, 11, 331–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, F., & Hogg, M. A. (2012). Self-uncertainty, social identity prominence and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 538–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223–255.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2006). Social identity theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 111–136). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69–126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2012). Uncertainty-identity theory. In P. A. M.Van Lange, A. W.Kruglanski, & E. T.Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 62–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Meehan, C., & Farquharson, J. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1061–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D. K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A. T., & Moffitt, G. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 135–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent informational influence. In W.Doise & S.Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 139–182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms as social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohman, Z. P., & Hogg, M. A. (2011). Fear and uncertainty in the face of death: The role of life after death in group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 751–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohman, Z. P., Hogg, M. A., & Bligh, M. C. (2010). Identity and intergroup leadership: Asymmetrical political and national identification in response to uncertainty. Self and Identity, 9, 113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Chaikalis-Petritsis, V., Abrams, D., Sidanius, J., van der Toorn, J., & Bratt, C. (2012). Why men (and women) do and don't rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 197–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newport, F. (2010, July 10). Tea Party supporters overlap Republican base: Eight out of 10 Tea Party supporters are Republicans. Gallup Politics. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/141098/tea-party-supporters-overlap-republican-base.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2011). Beyond red vs. blue: The political typology. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2011/05/04/typology-group-profiles/.
   Google Scholar
• Postel, C. (2012). The Tea Party in historical perspective: A conservative response to a crisis of political economy. In L.Rosenthal & C.Trost (Eds.), Steep: The precipitous rise of the Tea Party (pp. 25–46). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sani, F. (2008). Schism in groups: A social psychological account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 718–732.
   Google Scholar
• Sani, F., & Pugliese, A. (2008). In the name of Mussolini: Explaining the schism in an Italian right-wing political party. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 242–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost, C., & Rosenthal, L. (2012). Introduction: The rise of the Tea Party. In L.Rosenthal & C.Trost (Eds.), Steep: The precipitous rise of the Tea Party (pp. 1–22). Berkeley: The University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bos, K. (2009). Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 197–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zernicke, K., & Thee-Brenan, M. (2010, April 14). Poll finds Tea Party Backers wealthier and more educated. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?_r = 0.
   Google Scholar