Be yourself, image is nothing: bias correction when viewing ads in sequence

References

• Abelson, R. P., & Prentice, D. A. (1997). Contrast tests of interaction hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 2, 315–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, Y. -W., Wegener, D. T., Hsiao, C. -C., & Petty, R. E. (2010). Dimensional range overlap and context effects in consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 530–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, I. M., Albarracin, D., Brown, R. D., Li, H., Kumkale, E. C., & Kumkale, G. T. (2009). When the expectations from a message will not be realized: Naïve theories can eliminate expectation-congruent judgments via correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 933–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M. (1989). Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isbell, L. M., & Wyer, R. S. Jr. (1999). Correcting for mood-induced bias in the evaluation of political candidates: The roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y. S., & Herr, P. M. (2006, June). Beauty and the beholder: Toward an integrative model of communication source effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, K. L. (1991, March). Memory and evaluation effects in competitive advertising environments. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 463–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., Seta, J. J., & Crelia, R. A. (1990, July). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In E. T.Higgins & A. W.Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.) (pp. 254–284). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668–672.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983, September). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (1980). The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & White, P. H. (1998). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Implications for persuasion. Social Cognition, 16, 93–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Contextual contrast and perceived knowledge: Exploring the implications for persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, C., Jensen, T. D., & Carlson, L. (1994). The effects of multiple product endorsements by celebrities on consumers' attitudes and intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 535–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995, March). Flexible correction process in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (2001). On the use of naive theories of bias to remove or avoid bias: The flexible correction model. Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 378–383.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Y. (1990, September). The effects of contextual priming in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 215–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar