2,578
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Social norms versus social motives: the effects of social influence and motivation to control prejudiced reactions on the expression of prejudice

, &
Pages 55-67 | Received 07 Jun 2013, Accepted 09 Mar 2014, Published online: 14 Apr 2014

References

  • Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
  • Aronson, E., Ellsworth, P. C., Carlsmith, J. M., & Gonzales, M. H. (1990). Methods of research in social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(Whole no. 416)
  • Ball, C. A. (2010). Is it possible to be against same-sex marriage without being homophobic?The Huffington Post. Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carlos-a-ball/is-it-possible-to-be-agai_b_692187.html.
  • Clark, R. D., & Maass, A. (1990). The effects of majority size on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 99–117. 10.1002/ejsp.2420200203.
  • Cowan, G., Heiple, B., Marquez, C., Khatchadourian, D., & McNevin, M. (2005). Heterosexuals' attitudes toward hate crimes and hate speech against gays and lesbians: Old-fashioned and modern heterosexism. Journal of Homosexuality, 49, 67–82. 10.1300/J082v49n02_04.
  • Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O'Brien, L. T. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359.
  • Crandall, C. S., & Stangor, C. (2005). Conformity and prejudice. In J. F.Dovidio, P.Glick, & L.Rudman (Eds.), On The Nature of Prejudice: 50 years after Allport (pp. 293–309). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326. 10.1177/0146167297233009.
  • Edlund, J. E., Sagarin, B. J., Skowronski, J. J., Johnson, S. J., & Kutter, J. (2009). Whatever happens in the laboratory stays in the laboratory: The prevalence and prevention of participant crosstalk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 635–642. 10.1177/0146167208331255.
  • Fazio, R. H., & Hilden, L. E. (2001). Emotional reactions to a seemingly prejudiced response: The role of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 538–549. 10.1177/0146167201275003.
  • Federico, C. M., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Racism, ideology, and affirmative action revisited: The antecedents and consequences of “principled objections” to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 488–502. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.488.
  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T.Gilbert, S. T.Fiske, & G.Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed.) (pp. 357–414). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gabriel, U., Banse, R., & Hug, F. (2007). Predicting private and public helping behavior by implicit attitudes and the motivation to control prejudiced reactions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 365–382. 10.1348/014466606X120400.
  • Glaser, J., & Knowles, E. D. (2008). Implicit motivation to control prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 164–172. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.002.
  • Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one's opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence.”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 452–463. 10.1086/297808.
  • Jones, J. M. (2013, May 13). Same-sex marriage support solidifies above 50% in U.S.Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx.
  • Kohut, A. (2013, March 29). Yes, more Americans favor legalizing gay marriage, but just how many do?Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/29/yes-more-americans-favor-legalizing-gay-marriage-but-just-how-many-do/.
  • McGuire, W. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191–229). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Monteith, M. J., Deneen, N. E., & Tooman, G. D. (1996). The effect of social norm activation on the expression of opinions concerning gay men and blacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 267–288. 10.1207/s15324834basp1803_2.
  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the implicit association test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667. 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653.
  • Shamir, J. (1997). Speaking up and silencing out in face of a changing climate of opinion. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 602–614. 10.1177/107769909707400313.
  • Sniderman, P. M., & Carmines, E. G. (1997). Reaching beyond race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Stangor, C. (2009). The study of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination within social psychology: A quick history of theory and research. In T. D.Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B., & Jost, J. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486–496. 10.1177/0146167201274009.
  • Swim, J. K., Gervais, S. J., Pearson, N., & Stangor, S. J. (2009). Managing the message: Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination. In F.Butera (Ed.), Coping with minority status: Responses to exclusion and inclusion (pp. 55–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thrasher, J. F., Pérez-Hernàndez, R. R., Swayampakala, K. K., Arillo-Santillàn, E. E., & Bottai, M. M. (2010). Policy support, norms, and secondhand smoke exposure before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law in Mexico City. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1789–1798. 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180950.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.