Cultural and Generational Influences on Information Privacy Concerns within Online Social Networks: An Empirical Evaluation of the Miltgen and Peyrat-Guillard Model

References

• Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347 (6221), 509–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the facebook. International Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 4258, 36–58.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35 (4), 1017–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., Kobrin, S. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2004). International differences in information privacy concerns: A global survey of consumers. The Information Society, 20 (5), 313–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecere, G., Le Guel, F., & Soulié, N. (2015). Perceived internet privacy concerns on social networks in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 277–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (3), 434–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinev, T., Xu, H., Smith, J. H., & Hart, P. (2013). Information privacy and correlates: An empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts. European Journal of Information Systems, 22 (3), 295–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013): Eurobarometer 74.3 (2010). TNS Opinion and Social, Brussels [Producer]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5450 Data file Version 5.2.0. doi:10.4232/1.11627
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hajli, N., & Lin, X. (2016). Exploring the security of information sharing on social networking sites: The role of perceived control of information. Journal of Business Ethics, 133 (1), 111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin, R., & Dror, Y. (2016). Information privacy and the digital generation gap: An exploratory study. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 12 (4), 166–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hayduk, L. A., & Littvay, L. (2012). Should researchers use single indicators, best Indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12 (1), 159.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. M., Xu, H., Lee, J. J., & Rosson, M. B. (2010). Privacy as information access and illusory control: The case of the facebook news feed privacy outcry. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9, 50–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York City, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W., & Thong, J. Y. (2013). Internet privacy concerns: An integrated conceptualization and four empirical studies. MIS Quarterly, 37 (1), 275–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofnagle, C. J., King, J., Li, S., & Turow, J. (2010). How different are young adults from older adults when it comes to information privacy attitudes and policies?.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. W. (2006). Privacy concerns, privacy practices and web site categories: Toward a situational paradigm. Online Information Review, 30 (5), 569–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44 (2), 544–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2014). Stable P value calculation methods in PLS-SEM. Laredo, TX: ScriptWarp Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2015). A note on how to conduct a factor-based PLS-SEM analysis. International Journal of e-Collaboration (Ijec), 11 (3), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2017). WarpPLS 6.0 user manual. Laredo, Texas: Script Warp Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25 (2), 109–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasnova, H., & Veltri, N. F. (2010). Privacy calculus on social networking sites: Explorative evidence from Germany and USA. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (43), 3039–3048.
   Google Scholar
• Krasnova, H., Veltri, N. F., & Günther, O. (2012). Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites: The role of culture. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 4 (3), 127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer, T. W., & Deng, X. (2007). Building online trust through privacy practices. International Journal of Information Security, 6(5), 323–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., & Fox, S. (2009). Twitterpated: Mobile Americans increasingly take to tweeting. Washington DC: Pew Research Center Publications. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2009/02/12/twitter-and-status-updating/
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., & Macgill, A. (2007). Teens and social media. Washington DC : Pew Internet & American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2011). Empirical studies on online information privacy concerns: Literature review and an integrative framework. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28 (1), 453–496.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2012). Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework. Decision Support Systems, 54 (1), 471–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litt, E. (2013). Understanding social network site users’ privacy tool use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1649–1656. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10 (3), 393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Cao, J., & Everard, A. (2011). Privacy concerns versus desire for interpersonal awareness in driving the use of self-disclosure technologies: The case of instant messaging in two cultures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27 (4), 163–200.
   Google Scholar
• Mesch, G. S. (2012). Is online trust and trust in social institutions associated with online disclosure of identifiable information online? Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (4), 1471–1477.
   Google Scholar
• Milberg, S. J., Smith, H. J., & Burke, S. J. (2000). Information privacy: Corporate management and national regulation. Organization Science, 11 (1), 35–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltgen, C. L., & Peyrat-Guillard, D. (2014). Cultural and generational influences on privacy concerns: A qualitative study in seven European countries. European Journal of Information Systems, 23 (2), 103–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011). The evolution of Hofstede’s doctrine. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 18 (1), 10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41 (1), 100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nov, O., & Wattal, S. (2009, April). Social computing privacy concerns: Antecedents and effects. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 333–336), Boston, MA. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Osatuyi, B. (2015). Is lurking an anxiety-masking strategy on social media sites? The effects of lurking and computer anxiety on explaining information privacy concern on social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 324–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2008). Social networking profiles: An examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11 (1), 95–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pentland, A. (2014). Social physics: How good ideas spread-the lessons from a new science. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Petrescu, M. (2013). Marketing research using single-item indicators in structural equation models. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 1 (2), 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Post, G. V., & Walchli, S. B. (2014). Social network privacy: Trusting friends. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 10 (3), 113–137.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), 36, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönkkö, M., & Evermann, J. (2013). A critical examination of common beliefs about partial least squares path modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 16 (3), 425–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2010). The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Interacting with Computers, 22 (5), 428–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35 (4), 989–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. E. (2014). Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 51 (5), 546–562. doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turow, J., & Hennessy, M. (2007). Internet privacy and institutional trust insights from a national survey. New Media & Society, 9 (2), 300–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B., Watkins, I., Golbeck, J., & Huang, M. (2012). Understanding and changing older adults’ perceptions and learning of social media. Educational Gerontology, 38 (4), 282–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., Michael, K., & Chen, X. (2013). Factors affecting privacy disclosure on social network sites: An integrated model. Electronic Commerce Research, 13 (2), 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., & Hart, P. (2011). Information privacy concerns: Linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12 (12), 798–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Teo, H.-H., Bernard, C. Y. T., & Agarwal, R. (2012). Research note: Effects of individual self-protection, industry self-regulation, and government regulation on privacy concerns: A study of location-based services. Information Systems Research, 23 (4), 1342–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S. (2009). Determinants of online privacy concern and its influence on privacy protection behaviors among young adolescents. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43 (3), 389–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajicek, M. (2007, May). Web 2.0: Hype or happiness?. In Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A) (pp. 35–39). New York, NY: Association of Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1243441.1243453
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., Wang, C., & Xu, Y. (2011). Privacy in online social networks. ICIS 2011 Proceedings. Paper 3 Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/ISsecurity/3
   Google Scholar