Shoot Architecture and Morphology of Different Branch Orders in Fig Tree (Ficus carica L.)

Literature cited

• Aїachi-Mezghani, M. 2009. Déterminisme de la diversité caulinaire et radiculaire chez l’olivier (Olea europaea L.) et modélisation de la croissance. Approche morphogénétique. Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences Agronomiques, 353 p.
   Google Scholar
• Aїachi-Mezghani, M., A. Sahli, F. Labidi, K. Meddeb, A. Jebari Ben El, and S. Hadj. 2008. Analysis of primary and secondary growth and modelling growth dynamics of olive shoots (Olea europaea L.). J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 83:411–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ateyyeh, A.F. and M.T. Sadder. 2006. Preliminary study on the vegetative and reproductive growth of six common fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars in Jordan. Jordan J. Agr. Sci. 2:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Barthélémy, D. and Y. Caraglio. 2007. Plant architecture: A dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Annu. Bot. 99:375–407.
   Google Scholar
• Barthélémy, D., Y. Caraglio, and E. Costes. 1997. Architecture, gradients morphogénétiques et âge physiologique chez les végétaux, p. 89–136. In: J. Bouchon, P. de Reffye, and D. Barthélémy (eds.). Modélisation et simulation de l’architecture des végétaux. Science Update, INRA Editions, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Bassi, D., A. Dima, and R. Scorza. 1994. Tree structure and pruning response of six peach growth forms. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:378–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A.D. 1993. Les plantes à fleurs. Guide morphologique illustré. Edition, 342 p. Masson, Paris, Milan, Barcelone Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Sadok, I., N. Moutier, G. Garcia, F. Dosba, N. Grati- Kamoun, A. Rebai, B. Khadari, and E. Costes. 2013. Genetic determinism of the vegetative and reproductive traits in a F1 olive tree progeny: Evidence of tree ontogeny effect. Tree Genet. Genomes 9:205–221.
   Google Scholar
• Caraglio, Y. and D. Barthélémy. 1997. Revue critique des termes relatifs à la croissance et à la ramification des tiges des végétaux vasculaires, p. 11–88. In: J. Bouchon, P. de Reffye, and D. Barthélémy (eds.). Modélisation et simulation de l’architecture des végétaux. Sciences Update, Editions INRA, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Caraglio, Y. and D. Barthélémy. 2005. Revue critique des termes relatifs à la croissance et à la ramification des tiges des végétaux vasculaires. Arbres. Sci. 13:1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Caraglio, Y., E. Elguero, I. Mialet, and H. Rey. 1990. Le peuplier: Modélisation et stimulation de son architecture (Populus nigra L. cultivars, exemple des clones I 45/54 et I 214). Rapport de convention I.D.F/unité de modélisation des plantes du C.I.R.A.D/G.E.R.D.A.T.
   Google Scholar
• Champagnat, P. 1947. Les principes généraux de la ramification des végétaux ligneux. Rev. Hort. 30:335–341.
   Google Scholar
• Chatti, K., A. Salhi-Hannachi, M. Mars, M. Marrakchi, and M. Trifi. 2004. Analyse de la diversité génétique de cultivars tunisiens de figuier (Ficus carica L.) à l’aide de caractères morphologiques. Fruits 59:49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Costes, E. 2003. Winter bud content according to position in 3-year-old branching systems of ‘Granny Smith’ apple. Ann. Bot. 92:581–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costes, E. and Y. Guédon. 2002. Modelling branching patterns on 1-year-old trunks of six apple cultivars. Annu. Bot. 89:513–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costes, E., Y. Guédon, M. Jay, A. Audubert, and J. Lichou. 1996. Modeling of flower and fruit distribution in relation to shoot organisation and apricot tree architecture. Acta Hort. 384:291–295.
   Google Scholar
• Costes, E., P.E. Lauri, F. Laurens, N. Moutier, A. Belouin, F. Delort, J.M. Legave, and J.L. Regnard. 2004. Morphological and architectural traits on fruit trees which could be relevant for genetic studies: A review. Acta Hort. 663:349–356.
   Google Scholar
• Costes, E., P.E. Lauri, and J.L. Regnard. 2006. Analysing fruit tree architecture. Implication for tree management and fruit production. Hort. Rev. 32:1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ersoy, N., S. Gözlekçi, L. Kaynak, B. Dal, and K. Yazıcı. 2008. Relationships among the shoot, leaf and fruit growth of some fig (Ficus carica) cultivars grown in Antalya conditions. Acta Hort. 798:143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Flaishman, M.A., V. Rover, and E. Stover. 2008. The fig: Botany, horticulture, and breeding. Hort. Rev. 34:113–197.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, D. 1994. Analyse et modélisation des processus de croissance et développement qui contribuent aux performances agronomiques du Pêcher Prunus persica (L.) Batsch. de l’Université de Montpellier, France, Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences Agronomiques, 142 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gaaliche, B., P.E. Lauri, M. Trad, E. Costes, and M. Mars. 2011. Interactions between vegetative and generative growth and between crop generations in fig tree (Ficus carica L.). Sci. Hort. 131:22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaaliche, B., O. Saddoud, and M. Mars. 2012. Morphological and pomological diversity of fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars in northwest of Tunisia. ISRN Agron. 2012:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Germain, E. 1992. Le noyer, p. 620–632. In: A. Gallais and H. Bannerot (eds.). Dans: Amélioration des espèces végétales. Objectifs et Critères de Sélection. INRA, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, C., Y. Guédon, and E. Costes. 1999. Exploration of a plant architecture database with the AMAPmod software illustrated on an apple tree hybrid family. Agronomie 19:163–184.
   Google Scholar
• Guédon, Y., D. Bathélémy, Y. Caraglio, and E. Costes. 2001. Pattern analysis in branching and axillary flowering sequences. J. Theor. Biol. 212:481–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallé, F., R.A.A. Oldeman, and P.B. Tomlinson. 1978. Tropical trees and forests. An architectural analysis, 441 p. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Jay-Allemand, C., P. Doumas, B. Sotta, H. Tranvan, and E. Miginiac. 1995. Juvenility and physiology of rhizogenesis in two woody species (Sequoia semper.irens and Juglans nigra × Juglans regia), p. 79–99. In: H. Saudermann Jr. and M. Bonnet-Masimbert (eds.). EUROSILVA contribution to forest tree physiology. INRA Editions, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Lauri, P.E. 1991. Données sur l’évolution de la ramification et de la floraison du pêcher (Prunus percica L. Batsth) au cours de la croissance. Annu. Sci. Nat. Bot. Biol. Végét. 11:95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Lauri, P.E. 2007. Differentiation and growth traits associated with acrotony in the apple tree (Malus × domestica, Rosaceae). Annu. Bot. 94:1273–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauri, P.E. and Y. Caraglio. 1993. Architectural analysis of fig trees as a tool to study genetic diversity in cultivars. Acta Hort. 349:265–267.
   Google Scholar
• Lauri, P.E. and J.M. Lespinasse. 2001. Genotype of apple trees affects growth and fruiting responses to shoot bending at various times of year. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126:169–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauri, P.E. and F. Laurens. 2005. Architectural types in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.), p. 1300–1314. In: R. Dris (ed.). Crops: Growth, quality and biotechnology. World Food Limited, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Lauri, P.E. and E. Térouanne. 1995. Analyse de la croissance primaire de rameaux de pommier (Malus domestica Borkh.) au cours d’une saison de végétation. Can. J. Bot. 73:1471–1489.
   Google Scholar
• Lauri, P.E., E. Térouanne, and J.M. Lespinasse. 1997. Relationship between the early development of apple fruiting branches and the regularity of bearing. An approach to the strategies of various cultivars. J. Hort. Sci. 72:519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lespinasse, J.M. and J.F. Delort. 1986. Apple tree management in vertical axis: Appraisal after ten years of experiments. Acta Hort. 160:120–155.
   Google Scholar
• Lüttge, U., M. Kluge, and G. Bauer. 1992. Botanique. Traité fondamental. 3rd ed., 574 p. Edition Technique et Documentation, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• MARH (Ministère de l’Agriculture et des Ressources Hydrauliques). 2012. Budget économique 2012. Agriculture et Pêche, Tunis (Tunisie).
   Google Scholar
• Mars, M., K. Chatti, O. Saddoud, A. Salhi-Hannachi, M. Trifi, and M. Marrakchi. 2008. Fig cultivation and genetic resources in Tunisia: An overview. Acta Hort. 798:27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mars, M., B. Gaaliche, I. Ouerfelli, and S. Chouat. 2009. Systèmes de production et ressources génétiques du figuier (Ficus carica L.) à Djebba et Kesra, deux villages de montagne au nord ouest de la Tunisie. Rev. Régions Arides. 22:33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Renton, M., Y. Guédon, C. Godin, and E. Costes. 2006. Similarities and gradients in growth unit branching patterns during tree ontogeny based on a stochastic approach in ‘Fuji’ apple trees. J. Exp. Bot. 57:3131–3143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, S. and D. Barthélémy. 1999. Growth dynamics and morphology of annual shoots, according to their architectural position, in young Cedrus atlantica (Endl.) Manetti ex Carrière (Pinaceae). Ann. Bot. 84:387–392.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, S., D. Barthélémy, I. Ducousso, and E. Germain. 1998. Modalités d’allongement et morphologie des pousses annuelles chez le noyer commun, Juglans regia L., ‘Lara’ (Juglandaceae). Can. J. Bot. 76:1253–1264.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin, B. and B. Balci. 1998. Studies on phenological and pomological properties of Breba fruit producing fig cultivars. Acta Hort. 480:91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Sansavini, S. and S. Musacchi. 1993. Canopy architecture, training and pruning in the modern orchard. Proc. Sixth Int. Symp. Pear Growing, Medford, Oregon, 12–14 July 1993. (Acta Hort. 367:152–172).
   Google Scholar
• Scorza, R. 1984. Characterization of four distinct peach tree growth types. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109:455–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solar, A. and F. Stampar. 2003. Genotypic differences in branching patterns in fruiting habit in common walnut (Juglans regia L.). Annu. Bot. 92:317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, A. 2000. Patterns of vegetative growth and reproduction in relation to branch orders: The plant as a spatially structured population. Trees 14:329–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar