Soil Disinfestation with Steam: A Review of Economics, Engineering, and Soil Pest Control in California Strawberry

Literature cited

• Baker, K.F. and C.N. Roistacher. 1957. The U.C. system for producing healthy container-grown plants. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Ext. Serv. Manual 23.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley, G.H. and I. Lander-Thompson. 1934. Root rot of strawberry in Britain. The “Black Lesion” type of strawberry root rot. J. Pomol. Hort. Sci. 12:222–246.
   Google Scholar
• Bolda, M., L. Tourte, K. Klonsky, R.L. DeMoura, and K. Tumber. 2014. 2014 Sample costs to produce organic strawberries. University of California Davis Agriculture and Resource Economics Cost and Return Studies. http://coststudyfiles.ucdavis.edu/uploads/cs_public/94/4b/944b5aad-6660-4dcd-a449-d26361afcae2/strawberry-cc-organic-2014.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• CADPR. 2013. Nonfumigant strawberry production working group action plan. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pestmgt/strawberry/work_group/action_plan.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., L. Lynch, and T. Trout. 2001. Township limits on 1, 3-D will impact adjustment to methyl bromide phase-out. Calif. Agr. 55(3):12–18.
   Google Scholar
• CSC. 2015. 2015 Acreage survey update. https://calstrawberry1-web.sharepoint.com/Reports/Acreage%20Survey/2016%20Acreage%20Survey.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Daugovish, O., K.M. Klonsky, and R.L. De Moura. 2011. Sample costs to produce strawberries. http://coststudies.ucdavis.edu/current.php
   Google Scholar
• Daugovish, O., M. Mochizuki, and S. Fennimore. 2007. Control of difficult weeds in strawberry production in non-fumigated areas. Proc. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Altern. Emissions Reductions. Abstract 53.
   Google Scholar
• Fennimore, S.A., M.J. Haar, and H.A. Ajwa. 2003. Weed control in strawberry provided by shank and drip applied methyl bromide alternative fumigants. HortScience 38:55–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennimore, S.A., M.J. Haar, R.E. Goodhue, and C.Q. Winterbottom. 2008. Weed control in strawberry runner plant nurseries with methyl bromide alternative fumigants. HortScience 43:1495–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennimore, S.A., F.N. Martin, T.C. Miller, J.C. Broome, N. Dorn, and I. Greene. 2014. Evaluation of a mobile steam applicator for soil disinfestation in California strawberry. HortScience 49:1542–1549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mendez, E., D. Garcia-Sinovas, M. Becerril, A. De Cal, P. Melgarejo, A. Martinez-Treceno, S.A. Fennimore, C. Soria, J.J. Medina, and J.M. Lopez-Aranda. 2008. Chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for weed control and runner plant production in strawberry nurseries. HortScience 43:177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, P., P. Piccarolo, D. Ricauda Aimonino, and C. Tortia. 2010. A high efficiency steam soil disinfestation system, Part II: Design and testing. Biosyst. Eng., 107:194–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelsomino, A., B. Petrovičová, F. Zaffina, and A. Peruzzi. 2010. Chemical and microbial properties in a greenhouse loamy soil after steam disinfestation alone or combined with CaO addition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42:1091–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhue, R.E., S.A. Fennimore, and H.A. Ajwa. 2005. The economic importance of methyl bromide: Does the California strawberry industry qualify for a critical use exemption from the methyl bromide ban? Rev. Agr. Econ. 27:198–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haar, M.J., S.A. Fennimore, H.A. Ajwa, and C.Q. Winterbottom. 2003. Chloropicrin effect on weed seed viability. Crop Protection 22:109–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M., T. Miller, J. Rachuy, N. Dorn, I. Greene, J. Broome, R. Goodhue, and S. Fennimore. 2015. Soil disinfestation with steam in California strawberry production. Methyl Bromide Altern. Outreach. Abstract 18.
   Google Scholar
• Ibekwe, A.M., S.K. Papiernik, J. Gan, S.R. Yates, C.H. Yang, and D.E. Crowley. 2001. Impact of fumigants on soil microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:3245–3257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäderlund, A., G. Norberg, O. Zackrisson, A. Dahlberg, D. Teketay, A. Dolling, and M.C. Nilsson. 1998. Control of bilberry vegetation by steam treatment—Effects on seeded Scots pine and associated mycorrhizal fungi. For. Ecol. Manage. 108:275–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 1946. Soil steaming for disease control. Soil Sci. 61:83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, Z., S.A. Fennimore, J.M. Duniway, F.N. Martin, G.T. Browne, C.Q. Winterbottom, H.A. Ajwa, B.B. Westerdahl, R.E. Goodhue, and M.J. Haar. 2005. Alternatives to methyl bromide for strawberry runner plant production. HortScience 40:1709–1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klose, S., H.A. Ajwa, S.A. Fennimore, F.N. Martin, G.T. Browne, and K.V. Subbarao. 2007. Dose response of weed seeds and soilborne pathogens to 1,3-D and chloropicrin. Crop Protection 26:535–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koike, S.T. 2008. Crown rot of strawberry caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in California. Plant Dis. 92:1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koike, S.T., S.C. Kirkpatrick, and T.R. Gordon. 2009. Fusarium wilt of strawberry caused by Fusarium oxysporum in California. Plant Dis. 93:1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Aranda, J.M., L. Miranda, J.J. Medina, C. Soria, B. de los Santos, F. Romero, R.M. Perez-Jimenez, M. Talavera, S.A. Fennimore, and B.M. Santos. 2009. Hort. Technol. 19:187–192.
   Google Scholar
• Luvisi, A., A. Materazzi, and E. Triolo. 2006. Steam and exothermic reactions as alternative techniques to control soil-borne diseases in basil. Agron. Sustainable Dev. 26:201–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F.N. and C.T. Bull. 2002. Biological approaches for control of root pathogens of strawberry. Phytopathology 92:1356–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T.C., J.B. Samtani, and S.A. Fennimore. 2014. Mixing steam with soil increases heating rate compared to steam applied to still soil. Crop Protection 64:47–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minuto, G., A. Minuto, M.L. Gullino, and A. Garibaldi. 2003. Il calore umido per la disinfestazione del terreno: Osservazioni sulle condizioni di applicazione [Moist heat for soil disinfestation: observations on the application conditions]. Informatore Fitopatologico 10:66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Moyls, A.L., R.P. Hocking, G.H. Neilsen, and E.J. Hogue. 1994. Apple tree growth response in greenhouse pot tests using heat-treated replant soil versus orchard replanted trees with in situ heated soil. Acta Hortic. 363:57–63.
   Google Scholar
• NASS-USDA. 2015. 2014 State Agriculture Overview: California. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=CALIFORNIA. Accessed 2 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg, G., A. Dolling, A. Jäderlund, M.C. Nilsson, and O. Zackrisson. 2001. Control of heather by steam treatment: Effects on establishment and early growth of Scots pine. New For. 21:187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi, A., M. Raffaelli, C. Frasconi, M. Fontanelli, and P. Bàrberi. 2011b. Influence of an injection system on the effect of activated soil steaming on Brassica juncea and the natural weed seedbank. Weed Res. 52(2):140–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi, A., M. Raffaelli, M. Ginanni, M. Fontanelli, and C. Frasconi. 2011a. An innovative self-propelled machine for soil disinfection using steam and chemicals in an exothermic reaction, Biosys. Eng. 110:434–442.
   Google Scholar
• Ros, M., C. Garcia, M.T. Hernandez, A. Lacasa, P. Fernandez, and J.A. Pascual. 2008. Effects of biosolarization as methyl bromide alternative for Meloidogyne incognita control on quality of soil under pepper. Biol. Fertil. Soils 45:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux-Michollet, D., S. Czarnes, B. Adam, D. Berry, C. Commeaux, N. Guillaumaud, X. Le Roux, and A. Clays-Josserand. 2008. Effects of steam disinfestation on community structure, abundance and activity of heterotrophic, denitrifying and nitrifying bacteria in an organic farming soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40: 1836–1845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samtani, J.B., H.A. Ajwa, J.B. Weber, G.T. Browne, S. Klose, J. Hunzie, and S.A. Fennimore. 2011. Evaluation of non-fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for weed control and crop yield in California strawberries (Fragaria ananassa L.). Crop Protection 30:45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samtani, J.B., C. Gilbert, J.B. Weber, K.V. Subbarao, R.E. Goodhue, and S.A. Fennimore. 2012. Effect of steam and solarization treatments on pest control, strawberry yield, and economic returns relative to methyl bromide fumigation. HortScience 47:64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, L. 2008. Integrated pest management for strawberries, 2nd ed. Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program, University of California Agricultural and Natural Resources Publication 3351. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Stromberger, M.E., S. Klose, H. Ajwa, T. Trout, and S. Fennimore. 2005. Microbial populations and enzyme activities in soils fumigated with methyl bromide alternatives. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 69: 1987–1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, F.C. and M.C. Strong. 1931. Investigations on the black root of strawberry. Phytopathology 21:1041–1060.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, S., T. Kobayashi, K. Iwasaki, S. Yamane, K. Maeda, and K. Sakurai. 2003. Properties and metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils treated with steam sterilization compared with methyl bromide and chloropicrin fumigations. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 49:603–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA. 2000. Economic implications of the methyl bromide phase-out. Information Bull. No. 756. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/AIB756/. Accessed 2 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• USDS. 2013. Methyl bromide critical use nomination for preplant soil use for strawberry fruit grown in open fields. ( Submitted in 2012 for the 2014 use season.) http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr/2014_nomination.html. Accessed 2 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2015. 2016 critical use exemption nominations from the phaseout of methyl bromide. https://resources.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0369-0032. Accessed 2 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Vidotto, F., M. Letey, and D. Ricauda-Aimonino. 2009. Effects of soil steaming on weed seed viability. Abstracts. European Weed Res. Soc. 8th EWRS Workshop on Physical and Cultural Weed Control, Zaragoza, Spain, p. 56.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, S. 1952. Verticillium wilt and black root rot of strawberry. Calif. Agr. 6: 8–9,14.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, S. 1955. Longevity of the Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45:180–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, S. 1966. Chemical treatments and inoculum potential of soil, p. 53–78. In: J.G. Horsefall and K.F. Baker (eds.). Annual review of phytopathology, vol. 4. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, S., and A.O. Paulus. 1980. How soil fumigation benefits the California strawberry industry. Plant Dis. 64:264–270.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, S., R. Storkan, and J.E. Sagen. 1961. Verticillium wilt of strawberry controlled by fumigation of soil with chloropicrin and chloropicnn-methyl bromide mixtures. Phytopathology 51:744–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, T., V.U. Ultra Jr., S. Tanaka, K. Sakurai, and K. Iwasaki. 2008. Effects of methyl bromide fumigation, chloropicrin fumigation, and steam sterilization on soil nitrogen dynamics and microbial properties in a pot culture experiment. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 54:886–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zackrisson, O., G. Norberg, A. Dolling, M. Nilsson, and A. Jäderlund. 1997. Site preparation by steam treatment: Effects on forest vegetation control and establishment, nutrition, and growth of seeded Scots pine. Can. J. For. Res. 27:315–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar