Chemical Soil Fumigation for Strawberry Nursery in Jalisco (Mexico): 2013–2014 Results of Semarnat/Unido Project

Literature cited

• Dávalos, P.A., G.R. Aguilar, A.E. Jofre, A.R. Hernández, and M.N. Vázquez. 2011. Tecnología para sembrar viveros de fresa. In: S.A. Ríos (ed.). Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), 1a ed, 153 p. Celaya, Guanajuato, México.
   Google Scholar
• De Cal, A., A. Martínez-Treeceño, J.M. López-Aranda, and P. Melgarejo. 2004. Chemical alternatives to methyl bromide in Spanish strawberry nurseries. Plant Dis. 88(2):210–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cal, A., A. Martínez-Treeceño, T. Salto, J.M. López-Aranda, and P. Melgarejo. 2005. Effect of chemical fumigation on soil fungal communities in Spanish strawberry nurseries. Appl. Soil Ecol. 28:47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohoe, H., S. Mattner, R. Brett, V. Bianco, A. Shanks, R. Gounder, and I. Porter. 2001. Status of methyl bromide phase-out in the temperate Australian strawberry industry. Proc. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Altern. Emissions Reduct., San Diego, CA, 5–9 Nov. 2001. http://www.mbao.org.
   Google Scholar
• Duniway, J.M. 2002. Status of chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for pre-plant fumigation of soil. Phytopathology 92(12):1337–1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennimore, S., F. Martin, H. Ajwa, J. Duniway, G. Browne, C. Winterbottom, B. Westerdahl, R. Goodhue, L. Guerrero, and M. Haar. 2001. Alternative fumigants for control of soil pests: Strawberry as a model system. Proc. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Altern. Emissions Reduct., San Diego, CA, 5–9 Nov. 2001. http://www.mbao.org.
   Google Scholar
• García-Méndez, E., D. García-Sinovas, M. Becerril, A. De Cal, P. Melgarejo, A. Martínez-Treceño, S. Fennimore, C. Soria, J.J. Medina, and J.M. López-Aranda. 2008. Chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for weed control and runner plant production in strawberry nurseries. HortScience 43(1):177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Sinovas, D., M.A. Andrade, M. Becerril, A. De Cal, C. Redondo, T. Salto, J.J. Medina, C. Soria, J.M. López-Aranda, and A. Martínez-Treceño. 2014. Soil disinfection in Spanish strawberry nurseries—Three years without methyl bromide. Acta Hort. 1049:691–696.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, Z., S.A. Fennimore, J.M. Duniway, F.N. Martin, G.T. Browne, C.Q. Winterbottom, H.A. Ajwa, B.B. Westerdahl, and R.E. Goodhue, and M.J. Haar. 2005. Alternatives to methyl bromide for strawberry runner plant production. HortScience 40:1709–1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Aranda, J.M. 2014. Methyl bromide alternatives (chemical and non-chemical) for strawberry cultivation in conventional areas of production. Acta Hort. 1049:77–88.
   Google Scholar
• López-Aranda, J.M., J.J. Medina, L. Miranda, F. Montes, F. Romero, J.M. Vega, J.I. Paez, B. De los Santos, F. Dominguez, J. López-Medina, F. Flores, I. Clavero, J. Galvez, M. Becerril, J. Palacios, E. Bardon, M.L. Martínez-Beringola, T. Salto, A. De Cal, A. Martínez-Treceño, and P. Melgarejo. 2002. Alternatives to methyl bromide for use in strawberry production and nurseries in Spain. Proc. Int. Conf. Altern. Methyl Bromide: The Remaining Challenges, Seville, Spain, 5–8 Mar. 2002, p. 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• López-Aranda, J.M., C. Soria, B.M. Santos, L. Miranda, P. Dominguez, and, J.J. Medina-Mínguez. 2011. Strawberry production in mild climates of the world: A review of current cultivar use. Intl. J. Fruit Sci. 11(3):232–244. DOI: org/10.1080/15538362.2011.608294.
   Google Scholar
• López-Medina, J., J.M. López-Aranda, J.J. Medina, L. Miranda, F. Dominguez, C. Soria, E. Vázquez-Ortiz, and F. Flores. 2007. Strawberry production from transplants fumigated with methyl bromide alternatives. Span. J. Agr. Res. 5(3):407–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meszka, B., and E. Malusà. 2014. Effects of soil disinfection on health status, growth and yield of strawberry stock plants. Crop Protection 63:113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, I., S. Mattner, R., Mann, and R. Gounder. 2004. Strawberry nurseries: Summaries of alternatives to methyl bromide fumigation and trials in different geographic regions. Proc. Intl. Conf. Altern. Methyl Bromide, Lisbon, Portugal, 20–30 Sept., p. 67–70.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Bautista, G., G. Calderón, D. Jaen, and A. Curiel. 2012. Capacidad de propagación y calidad de planta de variedades mexicanas y extranjeras de fresa. México. Revista Chapingo. Ser. Hort. 18(1):113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Runia, W.T., and L.P.G. Molendijk. 2007. Optimization of metam sodium application by rotary spading injection. Comm. Apl. Biol. Sci., Ghent Univ. 72/3:687–691.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, A., G.T. Browne, B.D. Lampinen, S.M. Schneider, L. Simon, and T.J. Trout. 2008. Perennial crop nurseries treated with methyl bromide and alternative fumigants: Effects on weed seed viability, weed densities, and time required for hand weeding. Weed Technol. 22:267–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, A., G.T. Browne, B.D. Lampinen, S.M. Schneider, and T.J. Trout. 2009. Weed community composition in tree fruit nurseries treated with methyl bromide and alternative fumigants. Intl. J. Fruit Sci. 9:78–91. DOI: 10.1080/15538360902801957.
   Google Scholar
• TEAP. 2014. Report of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, Vol. 3, Evaluation of 2014 Critical Use Nominations for Methyl Bromide. Interim Report. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Plants Database. n.d. Plants Database: Classification. http://plants.usda.gov/classification.html. Accessed 1 February 2015.
   Google Scholar