Semi-Commercial Field Evaluation of Yeast Formulations for Control of Mango Postharvest Decay Caused by Botryosphaeriacean Fungi in Organic Production

References

• Bautista-Rosales, P.U., M. Calderon-Santoyo, R. Servín-Villegas, N.A. Ochoa-Álvarez, R. Vázquez-Juárez, and J.A. Ragazzo-Sánchez. 2014. Biocontrol action mechanisms of cryptococcus laurentii on colletotrichum gloeosporioides of mango. Crop Prot. 65:194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañamás, T.P., I. Viñas, J. Usall, R. Torres, M. Anguera, and N. Teixidó. 2008. Control of postharvest diseases on citrus fruit by preharvest applications of biocontrol agent Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2. Part II. Effectiveness of different cell formulations. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 49:96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Bello, G., C. Mónaco, M.C. Rollan, G. Lampugnani, N. Arteta, C. Abramoff, L. Ronco, and M. Stocco. 2008. Biocontrol of postharvest grey mold on tomato by yeasts. J. Phytopathol. 156:257–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01351.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira Costa, V.S., S.J. Michereff, R.B. Martins, C.A.T. Gava, E.S.G. Mizubuti, and M.P.S. Câmara. 2010. Species of Botryosphaeriaceae associated on mango in Brazil. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 127:509–519. doi: 10.1007/s10658-010-9616-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droby, S., M. Wisniewski, D. Macarisin, and C. Wilson. 2009. Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 52:137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droby, S., M. Wisniewski, N. Teixidó, D. Spadaro, and M.H. Jijakli. 2016. The science, development, and commercialization of postharvest biocontrol products. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 122:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finckh, M., A. van Bruggen, and L. Tamm. 2015. Plant diseases and their management in organic agriculture. APS Press, ST. Paul, Minesota.
   Google Scholar
• Gava, C.A.T., A.P.C. de Castro, C.A. Pereira, and P.I. Fernandes-Júnior. 2018. Isolation of fruit colonizer yeasts and screening against mango decay caused by multiple pathogens. Biol. Control 117:137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender, V., and L. Korsten. 2006. Evaluation of different formulations of Bacillus licheniformis in mango pack house trials. Biol. Control 37:237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender, V., L. Korsten, and D. Sivakumar. 2005. Semi-commercial evaluation of Bacillus licheniformis to control mango postharvest diseases in South Africa. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 38:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, A.M., G. Cirvilleri, G. Polizzi, P.W. Crous, J.Z. Groenewald, and L. Lombard. 2012. Lasiodiplodia species associated with dieback disease of mango (Mangifera indica) in Egypt. Australas Plant Pathol. 41:649–660. doi: 10.1007/s13313-012-0163-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konvalina, P. 2016. Organic Farming - A Promising Way of Food Production. doi: 10.5772/60459
   Google Scholar
• Lara, I., B. Belge, and L.F. Goulao. 2014. The fruit cuticle as a modulator of postharvest quality. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 87:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, N.B., M.V. Marcus, M.A. De Morais, M.A.G. Barbosa, S.J. Michereff, K.D. Hyde, and M.P.S. Câmara. 2013. Five Colletotrichum species are responsible for mango anthracnose in northeastern Brazil. Fungal Divers. 61:75–88. doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0237-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., D. Gong, S. Zhu, L. Zhang, and L. Zhang. 2011. Expression of PPO and POD genes and contents of polyphenolic compounds in harvested mango fruits in relation to Benzothiadiazole-induced defense against anthracnose. Sci. Hortic. 130:85–89. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobo, M., and J. Sidhu. 2017. Biology, postharvest physiology, and biochemistry of mango, p. 37–60. In: M. Siddigq, J.K. Brecht, and J.S. Sidhu (eds.). Handbook of mango fruit: Production, postharvest science, processing technology and nutrition. Wiley Blackwel, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, L., C. Ye, S. Guo, K. Sheng, L. Shao, T. Zhou, T. Yu, and X. Zheng. 2013. Preharvest application of antagonistic yeast Rhodosporidium paludigenum induced resistance against postharvest diseases in mandarin orange. Biol. Control 67:130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, L. V., G. Hughes, and F van den Bosch. 2007. The study of plant disease epidemics. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed, H., and A. Saad. 2009. The biocontrol of postharvest disease (Botryodiplodia theobromae) of guava (Psidium guajava L.) by the application of yeast strains. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 53:123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutungi, C. 2015. Unpacking postharvest losses in Sub-Saharan Africa : A meta-analysis. World Dev. 66:49–68. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, C.A. 2012. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 133:181–196. doi: 10.1007/s10658-011-9919-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, T. H., J. Deutsch, C. Yungmann, A. Zeitz, and S. H. Katz. 2015. New sustainable market opportunities for surplus food: a food system-sensitive methodology (fssm). Food and Nutrition Sciences 6:883-892. doi:10.4236/fns.2015.610093.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/FAO. 2011. International standards for fruit and vegetables: Mangoes. FAO, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Parafati, L., A. Vitale, C. Restuccia, and G. Cirvilleri. 2015. Biocontrol ability and action mechanism of food-isolated yeast strains against botrytis cinerea causing post-harvest bunch rot of table grape. Food Microbiology 47:85–92. doi:10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusky, D., N. Alkan, T. Mengiste, and R. Fluhr. 2013. Quiescent and necrotrophic lifestyle choice during postharvest disease development. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 51:155–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robiglio, A., M.C. Sosa, M.C. Lutz, C.A. Lopes, and M.P. Sangorrín. 2011. Yeast biocontrol of fungal spoilage of pears stored at low temperature. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 147:211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales Júnior, R., G.H.S. Nunes, L.L. de Lima, I.M. Guimarães, and P.L.D.D. Morais. 2009. Chemical control of stem rot caused by Lasiodiplodia theobromae in mango fruits. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 31:907–910. doi: 10.1590/S0100-29452009000300039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar, M. 2015. Practices for integrated control of mango (Mangifera indica L .) Diseases to protect in preharvest as well as postharvest phases. Biosci an Bioeng 1:57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, G.B., L. Ostergaard, N.H. Chapman, S. Knapp, and C. Martin. 2013. Fruit development and ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64(64):219–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120057.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silimela, M., and L. Korsten. 2007. Evaluation of pre-harvest Bacillus licheniformis sprays to control mango fruit diseases. Crop Prot. 26:1474–1481. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2006.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P. 2011. Integrated management of storage anthracnose of mango. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 41:63.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Z., and S.P. Singh. 2012. Mango, p. 108–142. In: D. Rees, G. Farrell, and J. Orchard (eds.). Crop post-harvest: Science and technology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Z., R.K. Singh, V.A. Sane, and P. Nath. 2013. Mango - Postharvest biology and biotechnology. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 32:217–236. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2012.743399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowdon, A.L. 2010. A Colour Atlas of Post-harvest Diseases and Disorders of Fruit and Vegetables: General introduction and fruits. Manson
   Google Scholar
• Spadaro, D., and S. Droby. 2016. Unraveling the mechanisms used by antagonistic yeast To control postharvest pathogens on fruit. In: Acta Horticulturae. pp 63–70
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Y. Bao, D. Shen, W. Feng, T. Yu, J. Zhang, and X.D. Zheng. 2008. Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata on cherry tomato fruit by use of marine yeast Rhodosporidium paludigenum Fell & Tallman. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 123:234–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, M., S. Droby, J. Norelli, J. Liu, and L. Schena. 2016. Alternative management technologies for postharvest disease control: The journey from simplicity to complexity. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 122:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., K. Chen, and G. Wang. 2013. Combination of the biocontrol yeast Crypotococcus laurentii with UV-C treatment for control of postharvest diseases of tomato fruit. BioControl 58:269–281. doi: 10.1007/s10526-012-9477-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., L. Wang, L. Ma, Y. Dong, S. Jiang, B. Xu, and X. Zheng. 2009. Biocontrol of major postharvest pathogens on apple using Rhodotorula glutinis and its effects on postharvest quality parameters. Biol. Control 48:79–83. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar