3,589
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Determination of Mechanical Properties of Banana Fruit under Quasi-Static Loading in Pressure, Bending, and Shearing Tests

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Akbarnejad, A., M. Azadbakht, and A. Asghari. 2017. Studies of the selected mechanical properties of banana (Cavendish Var.). Int. J. Fruit Sci. 17(1):93–101. doi: 10.1080/15538362.2016.1259083.
  • Altuntaş, E., and M. Yıldız. 2007. Effect of moisture content on some physical and mechanical properties of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grains. J. Food Eng. 78(1):174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.013.
  • Bruggenwirth, M., and M. Knoche. 2016. Factors affecting mechanical properties of the skin of sweet cherry fruit. J. Am. Soc. Horic. Sci. 141(1):45–53. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.141.1.45.
  • De Souza Costa, J.D., F.D.A.C. Almeida, A.F. Neto, and Í.H.L. Cavalcante. 2017. Physical and mechanical parameters correlated to the ripening of mangoes (Mangifera indica L.) cv.’Tommy Atkins’. Acta Agron. 66(2):186–192. doi: 10.15446/acag.v66n2.54757.
  • Doymaz, İ. 2007. Influence of pretreatment solution on the drying of sour cherry. J. Food Eng. 78(2):591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.10.037.
  • FAOSTAT. 2012. Fao International Software. <http://faostat.fao.org/faostat>.
  • Gholmohammadi, A., L. Roghanipour, and T. Mesri Ghendishmin. 2013. The effect of moisture content, speed, and direction of louding on mechanical properties of chichpea seed. Mech. Sci. Agric. Mach. 1(2):27–38. (In Persian).
  • Ince, A., S. Uğurluay, E. Güzel, and M.T. Özcan. 2005. Bending and shearing characteristics of sunflower stalk residue. Biosyst Eng. 92(2):175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.07.003.
  • Jahanbakhshi, A. 2018. Determination of some engineering properties of snake melon (Cucumis melo var. flexuosus) fruit. Agri. Eng. Int.: CIGR J. 20(1):171–176.
  • Jahanbakhshi, A., Y. Abbaspour‐Gilandeh, and T.M. Gundoshmian. 2018. Determination of physical and mechanical properties of carrot in order to reduce waste during harvesting and post‐harvesting. Food Sci. Nutr. 6(7):1898–1903. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.760.
  • Jahanbakhshi, A., and K. Kheiralipour. 2019. Influence of vermicompost and sheep manure on mechanical properties of tomato fruit. Food Sci. Nutr. 7(4):1172–1178. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.877.
  • Jahanbakhshi, A., V. Rasooli Sharabiani, K. Heidarbeigi, M. Kaveh, and E. Taghinezhad. 2019. Evaluation of engineering properties for waste control of tomato during harvesting and postharvesting. Food Sci. Nutr. 7(4):1473–1481. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.986.
  • Jahanbakhshi, A., R. Yeganeh, and A. Akhoundzadeh Yamchi. 2016. Determination of physical, mechanical and hydrodynamic properties of Scolymus. Electron. J. Food Process. Preserv. 8(1): 125–141. (In Persian). doi: 10.22069/ejfpp.2016.3139.
  • Jalilian Tabar, F., A.N. Lorestani, R. Gholami, A. Behzadi, and M. Fereidoni. 2011. Physical and mechanical properties of oak (Quercus persica) fruits. Agri. Eng. Int.: CIGR J. 13(4):1–7.
  • Kaveh, M., A. Jahanbakhshi, Y. Abbaspour‐Gilandeh, E. Taghinezhad, and M.B.F. Moghimi. 2018. The effect of ultrasound pre‐treatment on quality, drying, and thermodynamic attributes of almond kernel under convective dryer using ANNs and ANFIS network. J. Food Process. Eng. 41(7):e12868. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.12868.
  • Komarnicki, P., R. Stopa, D. Szyjewicz, Ł. Kuta, and T. Klimza. 2017. Influence of contact surface type on the mechanical damages of apples under impact loads. Food Bioproc. Tech. 10(8):1479–1494. doi: 10.1007/s11947-017-1918-z.
  • Komarnicki, P., R. Stopa, D. Szyjewicz, and M. Młotek. 2016. Evaluation of bruise resistance of pears to impact load. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 114:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.11.017.
  • Mahawar, M.K., K. Jalgaonkar, M. Kumar, V.S. Meena, and B. Bhushan. 2017. Determination of some physical properties of date palm fruits (cv. Khadrawy and Medjool). Acta Agrophys. 24(2):217–223.
  • Radunić, M., M.J. Špika, S.G. Ban, J. Gadže, J.C. Díaz-Pérez, and D. MacLean. 2015. Physical and chemical properties of pomegranate fruit accessions from Croatia. Food Chem. 177:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.102.
  • Rajkumar, P., N. Wang, G. EImasry, G.S.V. Raghavan, and Y. Gariepy. 2012. Studies on banana fruit quality and maturity stages using hyperspectral imaging. J. Food Eng. 108(1):194–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.05.002.
  • Reddy, B.S., and P. Srinivas. 2017. Effect of fruit size and maturity on selected mechanical properties of tomato. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci 5(4):1730–1737. doi: 10.18782/2320-7051.5723.
  • Sadrnia, H., A. Rajabipour, A. Javadi, Y. Mostofi, and A. Jafari. 2006. Comparing physical and mechanical properties of two varieties of watermelon: Charleston gray and crimson sweet. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 7(28):151–165. (In Persian).
  • Salehi, R., A. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, A. Jahanbakhshi, and F. Shahidi. 2018a. Evaluation and measurement of bioethanol extraction from melon waste (Qassari cultivar). Agri. Eng. Int.: CIGR J. 20(3):127–131.
  • Salehi, R., A. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, F. Shahidi, and A. Jahanbakhshi. 2018b. Potentiometric of bioethanol production from cantaloupe waste (Magassi Neishabouri Cultivar). J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. (In press). doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2018.05.006.
  • Shirvani, M., D. Ghanbarian, and M. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti. 2014. Measurement and evaluation of the apparent modulus of elasticity of apple based on Hooke’s, Hertz’s and Boussinesq’s theories. Measurement 54:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.04.014.
  • Singh, K.K., and B.S. Reddy. 2006. Post-harvest physico-mechanical properties of orange peel and fruit. J. Food Eng. 73(2):112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.01.010.
  • Stopa, R., D. Szyjewicz, P. Komarnicki, and Ł. Kuta. 2018. Determining the resistance to mechanical damage of apples under impact loads. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 146:79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.08.016.
  • Tapre, A.R., and R.K. Jain. 2012. Study of advanced maturity stages of banana. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Stud. 1(3):272–274.
  • Varghese, A., and J. Jacob. 2017. A study of physical and mechanical properties of the Indian coconut for efficient dehusking. J. Nat. Fibers. 14(3):390–399. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2016.1212760.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.