Mass Modeling of Indian Coffee Plum (Flacourtia Jangomas) Fruit with Its Physicochemical Properties

References

• Akbolat, D., C. Ertekin, H. Menges, K. Ekinci, and I. Erdal. 2008. Physical and nutritional properties of jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Mill.) growing in Turkey. Asian J. Chem 20(1):757.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1995. Method 920.39 C: Fat (crude) or ether extract in food and animal feed-Soxhlet method. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ashtiani, S.-H.M., J.B. Motie, B. Emadi, and M.-H. Aghkhani. 2014. Models for predicting the mass of lime fruits by some engineering properties. J. Food Sci. Technol 51(11):3411–3417. doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0862-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaimanee, P., O. Suntornwat, S.-H. Miraei Ashtiani, J. Baradaran Motie, B. Emadi, and M.-H. Aghkhani. 1994. Changes in carbohydrate content during fruit ripening—a new approach of teaching of carbohydrate chemistry in biochemistry course. Biochem. Educ. 22(2):101–102. doi: 10.1016/0307-4412(94)90098-1.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, M., and B. Shamasundar. 2015. Texture profile analysis and functional properties of gelatin from the skin of three species of fresh water fish. Int. J. Food Prop 18(3):572–584. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2013.845787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson, R. 1965. An apparatus for the measurement of thermal diffusivity of foods. Food Technol 19(5):198–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, B., and N. Borah. 2017. Studies on nutraceutical properties of Flacourtia jangomas fruits in Assam, India. J. Med. Plants 5(1):50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P., R.C. Pradhan, S. Mishra, A.S. Patel, and A. Kar. 2017. Physicochemical and nutritional characterization of jamun (Syzygium cuminii). Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. J 5(1):25–35. doi: 10.12944/crnfsj.5.1.04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikegwu, O., and F. Ekwu. 2009. Thermal and physical properties of some tropical fruits and their juices in Nigeria. J. Food Technol. 7(2):38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jeyachandran, R., and A. Mahesh. 2007. Enumeration of antidiabetic herbal flora of Tamil Nadu. Res J Med Plant 1(4):144–148. doi: 10.3923/rjmp.2007.144.148.
   Google Scholar
• Júnior, M.M., M. Batistote, and J.R. Ernandes. 2008. Glucose and fructose fermentation by wine yeasts in media containing structurally complex nitrogen sources. J. Inst. Brew. 114(3):199–204. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2008.tb00329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., R.C. Pradhan, and S. Mishra. 2016. Exploration of Shorea robusta (Sal) seeds, kernels and its oil. Cogent Food Agric 2(1):1186140.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J.H., and L. Eynon.1934. Determination of reducing sugars by Fehling’s solution with methylene blue indicator. London: N. Rodger.
   Google Scholar
• Le Moigne, M., C. Maury, D. Bertrand, and F. Jourjon. 2008. Sensory and instrumental characterisation of Cabernet Franc grapes according to ripening stages and growing location. Food Qual. Prefer 19(2):220–231. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M.J. 1990. Physical properties of foods and food processing systems. Elsevier. doi: 10.1533/9781845698423.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, T.K. 2013. Flacourtia jangomas. In: Edible Medicinal And Non-Medicinal Plants. Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Lorestani, A.N., F. Jaliliantabar, and R. Gholami. 2012. Mass modeling of caper (C apparis spinosa) with some engineering properties. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 4(5):e38–e42. doi: 10.1111/qas.12004.
   Google Scholar
• Mahawar, M.K., B. Bibwe, K. Jalgaonkar, and B.M. Ghodki. 2019. Mass modeling of kinnow mandarin based on some physical attributes. J. Food Process Eng. 42(5):e13079. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.13079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahawar, M.K., K. Jalgaonkar, V.E. Nambi, B. Bibwe, and V. Thirupathi. 2018. Modelling of rheological properties of Mango (cv. Neelum) suspensions: effect of sample concentration and particle size. J Agric Eng 55:13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mansouri, A., A.H. Mirzabe, and A. Ráufi. 2017. Physical properties and mathematical modeling of melon (Cucumis melo L.) seeds and kernels. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci 16(3):218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2015.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Marjanovic-Balaban, Z., S. Grujic, M. Jasic, and D. Vujadinovic. 2012. Testing of chemical composition of wild berries. In Third International Scientific Symposium “Agrosym 2012”, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 15-17 November, 2012. Book of Proceedings (pp. 154-160). Faculty of Agriculture, University of East Sarajevo.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, J.E., and K. Kheiralipour. 2015. Physical and nutritional properties of hawthorn fruit (Crataeguspontica L.). AgricEngInt: CIGR Journal, 17(1): 232-237.
   Google Scholar
• Muramatsu, Y., A. Tagawa, and T. Kasai. 2005. Thermal conductivity of several liquid foods. Food Sci Technol Res 11(3):288–294. doi: 10.3136/fstr.11.288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S.S. 2017. Vitamin C determination by indophenol method. 143–146. Food analysis laboratory manual. Springer, Cham, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44127-6_15.
   Google Scholar
• Odjo, S., P. Malumba, J. Dossou, S. Janas, and F. Béra. 2012. Influence of drying and hydrothermal treatment of corn on the denaturation of salt-soluble proteins and color parameters. J. Food Eng. 109(3):561–570. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, M., R.C. Pradhan, and S. Naik. 2011. Physical properties of fresh mahua. Int. Agrophysics 25(3):303–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathak, S.S., R.C. Pradhan, and S. Mishra. 2019. Physical characterization and mass modeling of dried Terminalia chebula fruit. J. Food Process Eng. 42(3):e12992. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.12992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, R.C., S. Naik, N. Bhatnagar, and S. Swain. 2008. Moisture-dependent physical properties of Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) kernel. Ind. Crops Prod. 28(2):155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, R.C., S. Naik, N. Bhatnagar, and V. Vijay. 2009. Moisture-dependent physical properties of jatropha fruit. Ind. Crops Prod. 29(2–3):341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, R.C., P.P. Said, and S. Singh. 2012. Physical properties of bottle gourd seeds. Agric. Eng. Int.: CIGR J 15(1):106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Rafiee, S., M. Keramat Jahromi, A. Jafari, M. Sharifi, R. Mirasheh, and H. Mobli. 2007. Determining some physical properties of bergamot (Citrus medica). Int Agrophys 21(3):293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, S.M., A. Pourfarzad, A.H. Sourky, and S.R. Jahromy. 2010. The physical properties of fig (Ficus carica L.) as a function of moisture content and variety. Philipp. Agric. Sci 93(2):170–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues-Amaya, D., and M. Kimura.2004. Handbook for carotenoids analysis. Int. Food Policy Res. Inst.
   Google Scholar
• Salihah, B.N., S. Rosnah, and A. Norashikin. 2015. Mass modeling of Malaysian varieties Pomelo fruit (Citrus Grandis L. Osbeck) with some physical characteristics. Int. Food Res. J 22(2):488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, G.C., R. Zahan, M.B. Alam, M. Islam, M. Mosaddik, and M. Haque. 2011. Antibacterial activity of Flacourtia jangomas and Flacourtia sepiaria. Int. J. Pharm. Life Sci. 2:7.
   Google Scholar
• Sasi, S., N. Anjum, and Y. Tripathi. 2018. “ETHNOMEDICINAL, PHYTOCHEMICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF FLACOURTIA JANGOMAS: A REVIEW”. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 10, no. 3, Mar. 2018, pp. 9-15, doi:10.22159/ijpps.2018v10i3.23998.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastian, K., P.M. Joseph, and K. Sheela. 2017. Packaging and storage techniques to enhance the shelf life of sweet lovi-lovi (Flacourtia spp.) fruits. J. Trop. Agric 55(1):99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, F., and S. Rahmati. 2013a. Mass modeling of fig (Ficus carica L.) fruit with some physical characteristics. Food Sci. Nutr 1(2):125–129. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahbazi, F., and S. Rahmati. 2013b. Mass modeling of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit with some physical characteristics. Food Nutr. Sci 4(1):1. doi: 10.4236/fns.2013.41001.
   Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, F., and S. Rahmati. 2014. Mass modelling of plum (Prunus domestica L.) fruit with some physical characteristics. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 6(2):215–219. doi: 10.3920/qas2012.0220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, V., B. Sudipta, S. Lal, A. Anand, H. Firoz, and A. Munshi. 2017. Comparison of physical and physiological properties of specialty maize inbred lines. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett 6(23):1758–1763.
   Google Scholar
• Sweat, V. 1974. Experimental values of thermal conductivity of selected fruits and vegetables. J. Food Sci. 39(6):1080–1083. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1974.tb07323.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaeefar, A., and A. Rajabipour. 2005. Modeling the mass of apples by geometrical attributes. Sci. Hortic. 105(3):373–382. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivek, K., S. Mishra, and R.C. Pradhan. 2018. Physicochemical characterization and mass modelling of Sohiong (Prunus nepalensis L.) fruit. J. Food Meas. Charact 12(2):923–936. doi: 10.1007/s11694-017-9708-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandkar, S.V., P.D. Ukey, and D.A. Pawar. 2012. Determination of physical properties of soybean at different moisture levels. Agric. Eng. Int.: CIGR J 14(2):138–142.
   Google Scholar
• Zare, D., F. Salmanizade, and H. Safiyari. 2012. Some physical and mechanical properties of Russian olive fruit. world academy of science, engineering and technology. Int. J. Biol. Biomol. Agric. Food Biotechnol. Eng 6(9):668–671.
   Google Scholar