The Pollen and Fruit Properties of Ficus carica Caprificus

Literature Cited

• Akaroğlu, N., U. Aksoy, G. Günver Dalkılıç, B. Şahin, and N. Şahin. 2007. Aydın ilinde bazı erkek incir çeşitlerinin fenolojik ve pomolojik özelliklerin belirlenmesi üzerinde araştırmalar. Türkiye V. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi, 1:531–535. Turkish
   Google Scholar
• Aksoy, U., B. Balci, H.Z. Can, and S. Hepaksoy. 2003. Some significant results of the research-work in Turkey on Fig. Acta Hort. 605:173–181. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.605.26.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, O., and S. Bayazit. 2012. İncir yetiştiriciliğinde ilekleme ve önemi. MKU Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 17(1):47–61.Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, O., S. Bayazit, M. Ilgin, and N. Karatas. 2017. Morphological diversity of caprifig (Ficus carica var. caprificus) accessions in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey: Potential utility for caprification. Sci. Hortic. 222:46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantarasuwan, B., R. Ham, B. Heuven, and P.C. Welzen. 2014. Pollen morphology of Ficus subsection Urostigma (Moraceae) Thai For. Bull. (BOT.) 42:52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Dar, J.A., A.A. Wani, and M.K. Dhar. 2020. Preliminary pollen analysis of some apple cultivars in Kashmir: towards understanding the apple pollen morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 90(2):431–438. doi: 10.1007/s40011-019-01117-6.
   Google Scholar
• Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Essid, A., F. Aljane, and A. Ferchichi. 2017. Morphological characterization and pollen evaluation of some Tunisian ex situ planted caprifig (Ficus carica L.) ecotypes. South Afr. J. Bot. 111:134–143. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2017.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evrenosoglu, Y., and A. Mısırlı. 2009. Investigations on the pollen morphology of some fruit species. Turk. J. Agr. For. 33:181–190. doi: 10.3906/tar-0801-47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaishman, M.A., V. Rodov, and E. Stover. 2008. The fig: Botany, horticulture, and breeding. Hortic. Rev. (Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.) 34:113–197.
   Google Scholar
• Geraci, A., V. Polizzano, P. Marino, and R. Schicchi. 2012. Investigation on the pollen morphology of traditional cultivars of Prunus species in Sicily. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 81(3) 175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraldo, E., M. Lopez Corrales, and J.I. Hormaza. 2010. Selection of the most discriminating morphological qualitative variables for characterization of fig germplasm. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 135: 240–249. Hammer, Ø, Harper, D.A.T., Ryan. doi:10.21273/JASHS.135.3.240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgın, M., F. Ergenoğlu, and S. Çağlar. 2007. Viability, germination and amount of pollen in selected caprifig types. Pak. J. Bot. 39(1):9–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadivi, A., R. Anjam, and K. Anjam. 2018. Morphological and pomological characterization of edible fig (Ficus carica L.) to select the superior trees. Sci. Hortic. 238:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadivi-Khub, A., and K. Anjam. 2014. Morphological characterization of Prunus scoparia using multivariate analysis. Plant Syst. Evol. 300:1361–1372. doi: 10.1007/s00606-013-0967-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mert, M. 2010. Anther and pollen morphology and anatomy in walnut (Juglans regia L.). Hortscience 45(5):757–760. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.45.5.757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milatović, D., D. Nikolić, S. Janković, D. Janković, and J. Stanković. 2020. Morphological characteristics of male reproductive organs in some walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes. Sci. Hortic. 272:109587. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirheidari, F., A. Khadivi, Y. Moradi, and S. Paryan. 2020. Phenotypic variability of naturally grown edible fig (Ficus carica L.) and caprifig (Ficus carica var. caprificus Risso) accessions. Sci. Hortic. 267:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolić, D., D. Milatović, A. Radović, and J. Trajković. 2020. Distinguishing Oblačinska sour cherry clones (Prunus Cerasus L.) by pollen morphology. GENETIKA 52(No1):187–198. doi: 10.2298/GENSR2001187N.
   Google Scholar
• Özbek, S. 1978. İncir. Özel meyvecilik. ÇÜZF yayınları. 128. Ders kitabı:11. Turkish: Cukurova University Faculty of Agriculture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podgornik, M., I. Vuk, I. Vrhovnik, and D.B. Mavsar. 2010. A survey and morphological evaluation of fig (Ficus carica L.) genetic resources from Slovenia. Sci. Hortic. 125:380–389. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, K., Y. Pal Sharma, P.R. Sharma, and S. Gairola. 2020. Pollen morphology and variability of the Rosa L. species of Western Himalaya in India. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. doi: 10.1007/s10722-020-00967-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, W.B. 1975. Figs, p. 568–589. In: J. Janick and J.N. Moore eds.. Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue Univ. Press, West Lafayette.
   Google Scholar
• Stover, E., M. Aradhya, L. Ferguson, and C.H. Crisosto. 2007. The Fig: Overview of an ancient fruit. Hort Sci. 42(5):1083–1087. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.42.5.1083.
   Google Scholar
• Teleb, S.S., and R.M. Salah-El-din. 2014. Pollen morphology of some species of genus Ficus L. (Moraceae) from Egypt. Egypt. J. Bot. 54(1):87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., J. Chen, Z.-B. Li, F.-P. Zhang, and D.-R. Yang. 2014. Has pollination mode shaped the evolution of Ficus pollen? PLoS ONE 9(1):e86231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman, S., and O. Çalışkan. 2016. Hatay’dan seçilmiş bazı erkek incir genotiplerinin (Ficus carica var. caprificus) tozlayıcı özellikleri. Anadolu. J. Agr. Sci. 31:315–320. Turkish.
   Google Scholar