Physical Characterization and Mass Modeling of Kendu (Diospyros melanoxylon Roxb.) Fruit

Literature Cited

• Akbolat, D., C. Ertekin, H. Menges, K. Ekinci, and I. Erdal. 2008. Physical and nutritional properties of jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Mill.) growing in Turkey. Asian J. Chem. 20(1):757.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Maiman, S.A., and D. Ahmad. 2002. Changes in physical and chemical properties during pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit maturation. Food Chem. 76(4):437–441. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00301-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altuntas, E., and Y. Özkan. 2008. Physical and mechanical properties of some walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivars. Int. J. Food Eng. 4(4). doi: 10.2202/1556-3758.1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, A., and S. Ercisli. 2008. Persimmon cv. Hachiya (Diospyros kaki Thunb.) fruit: Some physical, chemical and nutritional properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 59(7–8):599–606. doi: 10.1080/09637480701538221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, B., İ. Eski, F. Gürbüz, Z.A. Kuş, Y. Sesli, and S. Ercişli. 2020. Prediction of walnut mass based on physical attributes by Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Erwerbs-Obstbau 62(1):47–56. doi: 10.1007/s10341-019-00468-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertekin, C., S. Gozlekci, O. Kabas, S. Sonmez, and I. Akinci. 2006. Some physical, pomological and nutritional properties of two plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivars. J. Food Eng. 75(4):508–514. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnayak, D., R. Pradhan, S. Naik, and N. Bhatnagar. 2008. Moisture-dependent physical properties of jatropha seed (Jatropha curcas L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 27(1):123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, V., V. Maithili, and P.K. Vishwakarma. 2013. Comparative study of analgesic activity of diospyros melanoxylon (Roxb.) bark and root bark. J. Nat. Remedies 13(1):2013. January.
   Google Scholar
• Gürbüz, F., B. Demi̇r, E.S.K.İ. İkbal, Z.A. Kuş, K.U. Yilmaz, E. İlikçioğlu, and S. Ercişli. 2018. Estimation of the weights of almond nuts based on physical properties through data mining. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. Cluj. Napoca. 46(2):579–584. doi: 10.15835/nbha46210631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmar, B.Z., S. Mishra, and R.C. Pradhan. 2017a. Physico-chemical and sensory analysis of Kendu (Diospyros melaxoxylon Roxb.) jam using fuzzy logic. J. Food Meas. Charact. 11(4):1928–1935. doi: 10.1007/s11694-017-9575-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmar, B.Z., S. Mishra, and R.C. Pradhan. 2017b. Physico-chemical, mechanical and antioxidant properties of Kendu (Diospyros Melanoxylon Roxb.). Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 5(3):214–222. doi: 10.12944/CRNFSJ.5.3.05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, R., and S. Bal. 1997. Properties of pearl millet. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 66(2):85–91. doi: 10.1006/jaer.1996.0119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadam, D., and G. Pathade. 2014. Effect of tendu (Diospyros melanoxylon RoxB.) leaf vermicompost on growth and yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 3(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s40093-014-0044-4.
   Google Scholar
• Khanali, M., M. Ghasemi Varnamkhasti, A. Tabatabaeefar, and H. Mobli. 2007. Mass and volume modelling of tangerine (Citrus reticulate) fruit with some physical attributes. Int. Agrophys. 21(4):329–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheiralipour, K., A. Tabatabaeefar, H. Mobli, S. Rafiee, M. Sharifi, A. Jafari, and A. Rajabipour. 2008. Some physical and hydrodynamic properties of two varieties of apple (Malus domestica Borkh L.). Int. Agrophys. 22(3):225–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodabakhshian, R., and B. Emadi. 2016. Mass model of date fruit (cv. Mazafati) based on its physiological properties. Int. Food Res. J. 23(5):2057–2062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshnam, F., A. Tabatabaeefar, M.G. Varnamkhasti, and A. Borghei. 2007. Mass modeling of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit with some physical characteristics. Sci. Hortic. 114(1):21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorestani, A.N., and A. Tabatabaeefar. 2006. Modelling the mass of kiwi fruit by geometrical attributes. Int. Agrophys. 20(2):135–139.
   Google Scholar
• Mahawar, M.K., B. Bibwe, K. Jalgaonkar, and B.M. Ghodki. 2019. Mass modeling of kinnow mandarin based on some physical attributes. J. Food Process. Eng. 42(5). doi: 10.1111/jfpe.13079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri, A., A.H. Mirzabe, and A. Ráufi. 2017. Physical properties and mathematical modeling of melon (Cucumis melo L.) seeds and kernels. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci 16(3):218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2015.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Maridass, M., S. Ghanthikumar, and G. Raju. 2008. Preliminary phytochemical analysis of Diospyros species. Ethnobot. Leaflets 2008(1):868–872.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, W. 2004. Guidelines for the use of chlorine bleach as a sanitizer in food processing operations.
   Google Scholar
• Mohsenin, N.N. 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials.
   Google Scholar
• Naderi-Boldaji, M., R. Fattahi, M. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, A. Tabatabaeefar, and A. Jannatizadeh. 2008. Models for predicting the mass of apricot fruits by geometrical attributes (cv. Shams, Nakhjavan, and Jahangiri). Sci. Hortic. 118(4):293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.06.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, M., R. Pradhan, and S. Naik. 2011. Physical properties of fresh mahua. Int. Agrophys. 25(3):303–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathak, S.S., R.C. Pradhan, and S. Mishra. 2019. Physical characterization and mass modeling of dried Terminalia chebula fruit. J. Food Process. Eng. 42(3):e12992. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.12992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phate, V.R., R. Malmathanraj, and P. Palanisamy. 2020. An indirect method to estimate sweet lime weight through machine learning algorithm. Paper presented at the 2020 Fourth International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC). Erode, India
   Google Scholar
• Pliestic, S., N. Dobricevic, D. Filipovic, and Z. Gospodaric. 2006. Physical properties of filbert nut and kernel. Biosyst. Eng. 93(2):173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, R., S. Naik, N. Bhatnagar, and S. Swain. 2008. Moisture-dependent physical properties of Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) kernel. Ind. Crops Prod. 28(2):155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, R., S. Naik, N. Bhatnagar, and V. Vijay. 2009. Moisture-dependent physical properties of jatropha fruit. Ind. Crops Prod. 29(2–3):341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, R.C., P.P. Said, and S. Singh. 2012. Physical properties of bottle gourd seeds. Agric. Eng. Int. 15(1):106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Rafiee, S., M. Keramat Jahromi, A. Jafari, M. Sharifi, R. Mirasheh, and H. Mobli. 2007. Determining some physical properties of bergamot (Citrus medica). Int. Agrophys. 21(3):293–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, C.G. 2015. Engineering for storage of fruits and vegetables: Cold storage, controlled atmosphere storage, modified atmosphere storage. Academic Press. ISBN: 0128033657.
   Google Scholar
• Rathore, J.S. 1972. Diospyros melanoxylon, a Bread-Winner Tree of India. Econ. Bot. 26(4):333–339. doi: 10.1007/BF02860703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, S.M., A. Pourfarzad, A.H. Sourky, and S.R. Jahromy. 2010. The physical properties of fig (Ficus carica L.) as a function of moisture content and variety. Philipp. Agric. Sci. 93(2):170–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salihah, B., R. Shamsudin, and A.A. Norashikin. 2015. Mass modeling of Malaysian varieties pomelo fruit (Citrus Grandis L. Osbeck) with some physical characteristics. Int. Food Res. J. 22:488–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, F., and S. Rahmati. 2013a. Mass modeling of fig (Ficus carica L.) fruit with some physical characteristics. Food Sci. Nutr. 1(2):125–129. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahbazi, F., and S. Rahmati. 2013b. Mass modeling of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit with some physical characteristics. Food Sci. Nutr. 4(1):1–5. doi: 10.4236/fns.2013.41001.
   Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, F., and S. Rahmati. 2014. Mass modeling of persimmon fruit with some physical characteristics. Agric. Eng. Int. 16(1):289–293.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V., B. Sudipta, S. Lal 1, A. Anand, H. Firoz, and A. Munshi. 2017. Comparison of physical and physiological properties of specialty maize inbred lines. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 6(23):1758–1763.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, S., Z. Tan, J. Xie, and J. Lu. 2015. The effects of skin thickness on optical transmission characteristics in fruits tissues. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi= Guang Pu 35(7):1817–1823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthar, S., and S. Das. 1996. Some physical properties of karingda [Citrullus lanatus (Thumb) Mansf] seeds. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 65(1):15–22. doi: 10.1006/jaer.1996.0075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaeefar, A., and A. Rajabipour. 2005. Modeling the mass of apples by geometrical attributes. Sci. Hortic. 105(3):373–382. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaeefar, A., A. Vefagh-Nematolahee, and A. Rajabipour. 2000. Modeling of orange mass based on dimensions. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2(4):299–305.
   Google Scholar
• Vivek, K., S. Mishra, and R.C. Pradhan. 2018. Physicochemical characterization and mass modelling of Sohiong (Prunus nepalensis L.) fruit. J. Food Meas. Charact. 12(2):923–936. doi: 10.1007/s11694-017-9708-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar