Organic Acids, Sugars and Bioactive Compounds of Promising Medlar (Mespilus Germanica L.) Genotypes Selected from Turkey

References

• Akbulut, M., S. Ercisli, T. Jurikova, J. Mlcek, and S. Gozlekci. 2016. Phenotypic and Bioactive Diversity on Medlar Fruits (Mespilus germanica L.). Erwerbs-Obstbau. 3:185–191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0272-z.
   Google Scholar
• Akçay, M.E., Y. Özdemir, and A. Doğan. 2016. Determination of some characteristics of Akçakoca 77® a new cultiard for medlar cultivation. (In Turkish). Bahçe Special issue. 145: 832–837.
   Google Scholar
• Akın, Y., and S.Z. Bostan. 2018. Chemical pre-characterization of medlar genotypes in terme district (Samsun, Turkey). Int. J. En. Res. Technol. 1(2):08–10.
   Google Scholar
• Altuntaş, E., E.N. Gül, and M. Bayram. 2013. The physical, chemical and mechanical properties of medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) during physiological maturity and ripening period. J. Agric. Fac. Gaziosmanpasa Univ. (JAFAG) 30(1):33–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag183.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2000a. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 17th. MD: AOAC international, Gaithersburg. Percentages of moisture by vacuum oven (method 934.06).
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2000b. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 17th. MD: AOAC international. Ashbydirectanalysis, Gaithersburg. method 940. 26.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2000c. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international (protein by Kjeldahl nitrogen (method 920.152).
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2000d. The total fat content was determined in accordance with the method of the association of official analytical chemists methods total fat by soxhlet extraction (method 920.39C).
   Google Scholar
• Ayaz, F.A., H.S. Huang, L.T. Chuang, D.J. Vanderjagt, and R.H. Glew. 2002. The fatty asid composition of medlar (Mespilus germanica) fruit at different stages of development. Ital. J. Food Sci. 14:439–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aygün, A., and A.R. Taşçı. 2013. Some fruit characteristics of medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) genotypes grown in Ordu, Turkey. Scientific Papers, Series B, Horticulture. Vol. LVII: 149–151.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J.R., and J.W. Thieret. 1989. The medlar (Mespilus germanica, Rosaceae) from antiquity to obscurity. Econ. Bot. 43(3):328–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baytop, T. 1999. Curing with plants in Turkey, in the past and today, 299. (In Turkish). Nobel Medical Books House. 2nd. Çapa, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Beyhan, O., M. Elmastas, and F. Gedikli. 2010. Total phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of leaf, dry fruit and fresh fruit of feijoa (Acca sellowiana, Myrtaceae). J. Med. Plant Res. 11:1065–1072. doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR10.008.
   Google Scholar
• Bibalani, G.H., and F.M. Sayadmahaleh. 2012. Medicinal benefits and usage of medlar (Mespilus germanica) in Gilan province (Roudsar District), Iran. J. Med. Plants Res. 6(7):1155–1159. doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR11.661.
   Google Scholar
• Bignami, C. 1998. The Medlar (Mespilus germanica L.), Azarole (Crataegus azarolus L.) and Service Tree (Sorbus domestica L.). Workshop and Pomological Exhibition on “Conservation and Utilisation of Minor Fruit Tree Species in Europe“, November 27-28, Accademia dei Georgofili - Logge Uffizi Corti - Florence (Italy).
   Google Scholar
• Bostan, S.Z. 2002. Interrelationships among pomological traits and selection of medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) types in Turkey. J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 56(4):215–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostan, S.Z., and A. İslam. 2007. A research on breeding by selection of medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) types in eastern black sea region of Turkey. (In Turkish) V. National Horticultural Congress, Atatürk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, 1: 494–501, 4-7September, Erzurum, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Brand-Williams, W., M.E. Culivier, and C. Berset. 1995. Use of free radical method to evaluation of antioksidant activity. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 28:25–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakır, E., and A. Öztürk. 2019. Determination of Promising Medlar Genotypes in Tekkeköy District of Samsun. Int. J. Agric. Wildl. Sci. (IJAWS) 5(2): 240–249. (In Turkish). doi: https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.609382.
   Google Scholar
• Çakır, E., A. Öztürk, and B. Öztürk. 2019. Antioxidant properties of promising medlar genotypes grown in Tekkeköy district of Samsun province. 1st International Congress of the Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science Technology, Kervansaray Lara Hotel, Eds: A. Şekeroğlu, H. Eleroğlu, M. Duman, 08-10 Nowember, Antalya, Turkey. Congress Book: 275–281.
   Google Scholar
• Donno, D., M.G. Mellano, Ž. Prgomet, A.K. Cerutti, and G.L. Beccaro. 2017. Phytochemical characterization and antioxidant activity evaluation of Mediterranean medlar fruit (Crataegus azarolus L.): Preliminary study of underutilized genetic resources as a potential source of health-promoting compound for food supplements. J. Food Nutr. Res. 56(1):18–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman, C. 2019. Determination of pomological characteristics of medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) genotypes grown in Aybastı (Ordu) district. (In Turkish), M.Sc. Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Ercisli, S., M. Sengul, H. Yildiz, D. Sener, B. Duralija, S. Voca, and D. Dujmovic Purgar. 2012. Phytochemical and antioxidant characteristics of medlar fruits (Mespilus germanica L.). J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 85:86–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glew, R.H., F.A. Ayaz, C. Sanz, D.J. Vanderjagt, H.S. Huang, L.T. Chuang, and M. Strnad. 2003a. Effect of postharvest period on sugars, organic asids and fatty asids composition in commercially sold medlar (Mespilus germanica ‘’Dutch”) Fruit. Eur. Food Sci. Technol. 216(5):390–394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-002-0654-3.
   Google Scholar
• Glew, R.H., F.A. Ayaz, C. Sanz, D.J. Vanderjagt, H.S. Huang, L.T. Chuang, and M. Strnad. 2003b. Changes in sugars, organic asids in medlar (mespilus germanica) during fruit development. Food Chem. 83(3):363–369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00097-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hacıseferoğulları, H., M. Özcan, H.M. Sonmete, and O. Özbek. 2005. Some physical and chemical parameters of wild medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) fruit grown in Turkey. J. Food. Eng. 69:1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyoncu, İ.H., N. Ersoy, A. Yalçın Elidemir, and A. Tolay. 2013. Some physico-chemical and nutritional properties of ‘muşmula’ medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) grown in Northeast Anatolia. Int. J. Biol. Biomol. Agric. Food Biotechnol. Eng. 7(6):434–436.
   Google Scholar
• Khadivi, A., M. Rezaei, P. Heidari, A. Safari-Khuzani, and M. Sahebi. 2019. Morphological and fruit characterizations of common medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) germplasm. Sci. Hortic. 252:38–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.03.014.
   Google Scholar
• Koca, N., and F. Karadeniz. 2005. Natural antioxidant compounds in foods. (In Turkish). GIDA 30(4):229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Közen, P., and S.Z. Bostan. 2016. Selection of medlar types (Mespilus germanica L.) grown in Tonya county (Trabzon province, Turkey). (In Turkish). International Multidisciplinary Congress of Eurasia, July 11-13, Odessa (Ukraine). Poster: 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kurbanova, R., R. Mirzaoğlu, E. Özcan, R. Şeker, and A. Koçak. 1998. Fruit and vegetable plants used in the treatment of diseases. In Turkish. Buğra Publisher, page 153. Konya.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H.S., and G.A. Coates. 2000. Quantitative study of free sugars and myo-inositol in citrus juices by HPLC and literature compilatio. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 14:2123–2141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1081/JLC-100100476.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, T.K. 2012. Edible medicinal and non-medicinal plants. Vol. 4. Fruits. 437–441. Springer, Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York.
   Google Scholar
• Maral, E., and S.Z. Bostan. 2020. Physical and chemical characterization of promising medlar genotypes from Çarşamba district (Samsun province, Turkey). J. Agric. Nat. 22(4): 816-823.
   Google Scholar
• Nezhadghan, B.A., and H. Hassanpour. 2018. Investigation of physicochemical characterizations of some Medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) genotypes in East Azerbaijan province. Iran. J. Hortic. Sci. 49(1):157–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2017.214449.1069.
   Google Scholar
• Özbek, S. 1978. General Fruit Growing. ( (In Turkısh)). Çukurova University Agricultural Faculty, Adana, Turkey. Publication Nr.: 131.
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, Y., R. Gerçekçioğlu, and M. Polat. 1997. A study on the determination of fruit characteristics of medlar (Mespilus germanica L) types in Tokat (Turkey) central administrative district, 12319. (In Turkish). Pome Fruits Symposium. (Eds: M. Büyükyılmaz and M. Burak), September 2-5, Atatürk Horticultural Central Research Institute, Yalova,  Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk, A., K. Yildiz, B. Ozturk, O. Karakaya, S. Gun, S.S. Uzun, and M. Gundogdu. 2019. Maintaining postharvest quality of medlar (Mespilus germanica) fruit using modified atmosphere packaging and methyl jasmonate. LWT. 111:117–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.033.
   Google Scholar
• Pető, J., I. Cserni, and A. Hüvely. 2016. Some beneficial nutrient and mineral content of medlar fruits. Gradus 3(1):258–262.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, I., A. Stănilă, and S. Stănilă. 2013. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Rosa canina L. biotypes from spontaneous flora of Transylvania. Chem. Cent. J. 7:73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-7-73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rop, O., J. Sochor, T. Jurikova, O. Zitka, H. Skutkova, J. Mlcek, P. Salas, B. Krska, P. Babula, V. Adam, et al. 2011. Effect of five different stages of ripening on chemical compounds in medlar (Mespilus germanica L.). Molecules. 16:74–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16010074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabry, Z.I., and R.L. Rizek. 1982. Food composition tables for the near east. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper. FAO, Rome, 275pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sarıyıldız, S. 2019. Selection of naturally growing medlar genotypes (Mespilus germanica L.) in Giresun province (Turkey) center. (In Turkish), M.Sc. Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Seçilmiş Canbay, H., E. Atay, and S. Oğüt. 2015. Determination of fruit characteristics, fatty acid profile and total antioxidant capacity of Mespilus germanica L. fruit. J. Coastal Life Med. 3(11):930–933. doi: https://doi.org/10.12980/jclm.3.2015j5-81.
   Google Scholar
• Selcuk, N., and M. Erkan. 2015. The effects of modified and palliflex controlled atmosphere storage on postharvest quality and composition of ‘Istanbul’medlar fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 99:9–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.07.004.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, J.L., and B. Lloyd. 2012. Health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Adv. Nutr. 3(4):506–516. doi: https://doi.org/10.3945/an.112.002154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun, M., and S.Z. Bostan. 2019. Selection of medlar genotypes (Mespilus germanica L.) grown in Sürmene (Trabzon, Turkey) province. (In Turkish). Igdir Univ. J. Inst. Sci. Technol. 9(2):604–613. doi: https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.474607.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, R., C. Nelson, C. Glaydys, and A. Arias. 2009. Bromatological chemical study of the fruit of the Níspero De Palo (Mespilus germanica L.) from Ayacucho. Facultad De Farmacia Y Bioquímica Ciencia E Investigación 12(2):90–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.15381/ci.v12i2.3405.
   Google Scholar
• Veljković, B., V. Jakovljević, M. Stanković, and Z. Dajić-Stevanović. 2019. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties of fresh fruits and some traditional products of wild grown raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 47(3):565–573. doi: https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47311465.
   Google Scholar
• Waźbińska, J. 2007. The yield and content of some chemical components in fruits of common medlar (Mespilus germanica L.). Part II: Content of some chemical components in fruits of common medlar (Mespilus germanica L.). Sodininkyste Ir Daržininkyste 26:69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, A. 2015. Selection of medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) genotypes naturally grown in Tokat region. (In Turkish), PhD. Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, A., and R. Gerçekcioğlu. 2013. Medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) population and distribution in Tokat ecology. (In Turkish). J. Agric. Sci. Res. (TABAD) 6(2):01–04.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, A., R. Gerçekçioğlu, and Ö. Öz Atasever. 2016. Determination of pomological and chemical properties of some medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) genotypes. J. New Results Sci. 11:118–124.
   Google Scholar