Genetic Diversity and Similarity of Asian and European Pears (Pyrus Spp.) Revealed by Genome Size and Morphological Traits Prediction

References

• Abedi, R., A. Babaei, and G. Karimzadeh. 2015. Karyological and flow cytometric studies of Tulipa (Liliaceae) species from Iran. Plant Syst. Evol. 301(5):1473–1484. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-014-1164-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzani, K. 2002a. The position of pear breeding and culture in Iran: Introduction of some Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) cultivars. Acta Hortic. 587::167–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.587.18.
   Google Scholar
• Arzani, K. 2002b. Introduction of some Asian pear cultivars (Pyrus pyrifolia) to Iran. Acta Hortic. 596:287–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.596.45.
   Google Scholar
• Arzani, K. 2017. The national Asian pear (Pyrus Serotina Rehd.) project in Iran: Compatibility and commercial studies of introduced cultivars. First International Horticultural Science Conference of Iran (IrHC2017). Tehran Iran, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), September 4–7. Abstracts Book, P-67 (215) pp 192.
   Google Scholar
• Arzani, K., (2018). The onset of controlled hybridization, pollination studies, and the history of pollinizer application in the commercial fruit tree orchards in Iran. 5th International Symposium on Plant Genetic Resources &XXX International Horticultural Congress, Istanbul – Turkey, 12–16 August 2018. ( Abstract S1 pp 16–17).
   Google Scholar
• Arzani, K. 2020. The onset of controlled hybridization, pollination studies, and the history of pollinizer application in the commercial fruit tree orchards in Iran. Acta Hortic. 1297:137–144. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1297.19.
   Google Scholar
• Baccichet, I., S. Foria, R. Messina, E. Peccol, A. Losa, M. Fabro, G. Gori, P. Zandigiacomo, G. Cipriani, and R. Testolin. 2020. Genetic and ploidy diversity of pear (Pyrus spp.) germplasm of Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 67(1):83–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00856-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, L., K. Chen, D. Zhang, Y. Cao, T. Yamamoto, and Y. Teng. 2007. Genetic diversity and similarity of pear (Pyrus L.) cultivars native to East Asia revealed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 54(5):959–971. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9152-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak, S., X. Sun, G. Wang, and Y. Yang. 2019. Genome size unaffected by variation in morphological traits, temperature, and precipitation in turnip. Applied Sciences 9(2):253. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9020253.
   Google Scholar
• Bashiri, H., K. Cheghamirza, I. Arji, and N. Mahmodi. 2017. Assessing genetic diversity of Pyrus spp. in the central Zagros Mountains based on morphological characters. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 64(2):391–404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0367-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, J.M., I.J. Leitch, S. Patel, A. Pendharkar, and C.A. Knight. 2008. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytol. 179(4):975–986. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02528.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R.L., H.A. Quamme, R.E.C. Layne, and R.M. Skirvin.1996. Pears, p. 441–514. In: eds. (J. Janick and J.N. Moore.). Fruit breeding tree and tropical fruits. Vol. 1. John Wiley and Sons, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, A., F. Lheureux, and E. Dirlewanger. 2018. Walnut: Past and future of genetic improvement. Tree Genet. Genomes 14(1):1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito, G., J. Loureiro, T. Lopes, E. Rodriguez, and C. Santos. 2008. Genetic characterisation of olive trees from Madeira Archipelago using flow cytometry and microsatellite markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 55(5):657–664. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9268-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, E.E., K. Arumuganathan, S. Kresovich, and J.J. Doyle. 1992. Nuclear DNA content variation within the Rosaceae. Am. J. Bot. 79(9):1081–1086. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb13697.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doležel, J., J. Bartos, H. Voglmayr, and J. Greilhuber. 2003. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry A 51(2):127–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.10013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doležel, J., and J.A.N. Bartoš. 2005. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann. Bot. 95(1):99–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doležel, J., M. Doleželová, and F.J. Novák. 1994. Flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA amount in diploid bananas (Musa acuminata and M. balbisiana). Biol. Plant. 36(3):351–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doležel, J., J. Greilhuber, and J. Suda. 2007. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2(9):2233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doležel, J., S. Sgorbati, and S. Lucretti. 1992. Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Physiol. Plant. 85(4):625–631. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb04764.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellstrand, N.C. 2014. Is gene flow the most important evolutionary force in plants? Am. J. Bot. 101(5):1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellstrand, N.C., and L.H. Rieseberg. 2016. When gene flow really matters: Gene flow in applied evolutionary biology. Evol. Appl. 9(7):833–836. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, D.L., D.J. Ayre, R.J. Whelan, and A.G. Young. 2011. Patterns of hybridization and asymmetrical gene flow in hybrid zones of the rare Eucalyptus aggregata and common E. rubida. Heredity 106(5):841–853. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., and P.R. Mooney. 1990. Shattering: Food, politic, and the loss of genetic diversity. University of Arizona Press, USA, 278.
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraj, M., M. Vetriventhan, and M. Srinivasan. 2015. Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: An overview of its analytical perspectives. Genet. Res. Int. 2015:1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/431487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greilhuber, J., J. Doležel, M.A. Lysak, and M.D. Bennett. 2005. The origin, evolution, and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann. Bot. 95(1):255–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusova, K., L. Ekrt, P. Vít, F. Kolar, T. Urfus, and P. Hohenlohe. 2014. Continuous morphological variation correlated with genome size indicates frequent introgressive hybridization among Diphasiastrum species (Lycopodiaceae) in central Europe. PLoS One 9(6):1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidari, P., M. Rezaei, M. Sahebi, and A. Khadivi. 2019. Phenotypic variability of Pyrus boissieriana Buhse: Implications for conservation and breeding. Sci. Hortic. 247:1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, M., and A. Meister. 2010. Genome size variation in Malus species. J. Bot. 2010:1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/874304.
   Google Scholar
• Iketani, H., T. Manabe, N. Matsuta, T. Akihama, and T. Hayashi. 1998. Incongruence between RFLPs of chloroplast DNA and morphological classification in east-Asian pear (Pyrus spp.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 45(6):533–539. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008646016181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalilian, H., A. Zarei, and J. Erfani-Moghadam. 2018. Phylogeny relationship among commercial and wild pear species based on morphological characteristics and SCoT molecular markers. Sci. Hortic. 235:323–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadian, N., G. Karimzadeh, M. Sharifi, A. Moieni, and M. Behmanesh. 2017. In vitro polyploidy induction: Changes in morphology, podophyllotoxin biosynthesis, and expression of the related genes in Linum album (Linaceae). Planta 245(6):1165–1178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-017-2671-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedrzejczyk, I., and E. Sliwinska. 2010. Leaves and seeds as materials for flow cytometric estimation of the genome size of 11 Rosaceae woody species containing DNA-staining inhibitors. J. Bot. 2010:1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/930895.
   Google Scholar
• Kadkhodaei, S., K. Arzani, A. Yadollahi, and G. Karimzadeh. 2017. Preliminary assessment of cytological characters of two European pears (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars. First International Horticultural Science Conference of Iran (IrHC2017), Tehran Iran, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), September 4–7. Abstracts Book, P-63 (200) pp 188
   Google Scholar
• Karimzadeh, G., M. Danesh-Gilevaei, and M. Aghaalikhani. 2011. Karyotypic and nuclear DNA variations in Lathyrus sativus (Fabaceae). Caryologia 64(1):42–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2011.10589763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimzadeh, G., S.H. Mousavi, M. Jafarkhani-Kermani, and M. Jalali-Javaran. 2010. Karyological and nuclear DNA variation in Iranian endemic muskmelon (Cucumis melo var. Inodorus). Cytologia 75(4):451–461. doi: https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.75.451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadivi, A., F. Mirheidari, Y. Moradi, and S. Paryan. 2020. Morphological and pomological characterizations of Pyrus syriaca Boiss. germplasm. Sci. Hortic. 271:109424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, C.A., N.A. Molinari, and D.A. Petrov. 2005. The large genome constraint hypothesis: Evolution, ecology, and phenotype. Ann. Bot. 95(1):177–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korban, S.S., W. Wannarat, C.M. Rayburn, T.C. Tatum, A.L. Rayburn, and P. Gustafson. 2009. Genome size and nucleotypic variation in Malus germplasm. Genome 52(2):148–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/G08-109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koushesh-Saba, M., K. Arzani, and M. Rasouli. 2017. Genetic relationship of Iranian pear genotypes with European and Asian pears as revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 17(1):82–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2016.1220343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., C. Kirk, C. Deng, C. Wiedow, M. Knaebel, and L. Brewer. 2017. Genotyping-by-sequencing of pear (Pyrus spp.) accessions unravels novel patterns of genetic diversity and selection footprints. Hortic. Res. 4(1):17015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loureiro, J., E. Rodriguez, J. Doležel, and C. Santos. 2007. Two new nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry: A test with 37 species. Ann. Bot. 100(4):875–888. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J., C.I. Amos, and M. You. 2012. Principal components analysis of population admixture. PloS One 7(7):e40115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majdi, M., G. Karimzadeh, M.A. Malboobi, R. Omidbaigi, and G. Mirzaghaderi. 2010. Induction of tetraploidy to feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium Schulz-Bip.): Morphological, physiological, cytological, and phytochemical changes. HortScience 45(1):16–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.1.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte-Corvo, L., L. Goulão, and C. Oliveira. 2001. ISSR analysis of cultivars of pear and suitability of molecular markers for clone discrimination. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 126(5):517–522. doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.126.5.517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafzadeh, R., and K. Arzani. 2015. Superior growth characteristics, yield, and fruit quality in promising European pear (Pyrus communis L.) chance seedlings in Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 17(2):427–442.
   Google Scholar
• Nikzad Gharehaghaji, A., H. Abdollahi, K. Arzani, A. Shojaeiyan, M. Naghi Padasht, L. Dondini, and P. De Franceschi. 2014c. Contribution of western and eastern species to the Iranian pear germplasm revealed by the characterization of s-genotypes. Acta Hortic. 1032:159–167. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1032.21.
   Google Scholar
• Nikzad Gharehaghaji, A., K. Arzani, H. Abdollahi, A. Shojaeiyan, L. Dondini, and P.D. Franceschi. 2014a. Genomic characterization of self-incompatibility ribonucleases in the Central Asian pear germplasm and introgression of new alleles from other species of the genus Pyrus. Tree Genet. Genomes 10(2):411–428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-013-0696-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikzad Gharehaghaji, A., K. Arzani, H. Abdollahi, A. Shojaeiyan, M. Henareh, P. De Franceschi, and L. Dondini. 2014b. Chloroplast genome diversity of the Pyrus genus; from Iranian and European wild pear species to the cultivated cultivars. Acta Hortic. 1032:151–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1032.20.
   Google Scholar
• Noori, S.A.S., M. Norouzi, G. Karimzadeh, K. Shirkool, and M. Niazian. 2017. Effect of colchicine-induced polyploidy on morphological characteristics and essential oil composition of ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi L.). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 130(3):543–551. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-017-1245-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganová, V. 2009. The occurrence and morphological characteristics of the wild pear lower taxa in Slovakia. Hortic. Sci. 36(1):1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.17221/5/2008-HORTSCI.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira-Lorenzo, S., A.R.F. Dos Santos, A.M. Ramos-Cabrer, F. Sau, and M.B. Díaz-Hernández. 2012. Morphological variation in local pears from north-western Spain. Sci. Hortic. 138:176–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podwyszyńska, M., D. Kruczyńska, A. Machlańska, B. Dyki, and I. Sowi. 2016. Nuclear DNA content and ploidy level of apple cultivars including Polish ones in relation to some morphological traits. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 58(1):81–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/abcsb-2016-0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postman, J., N. Bassil, and R. Bell. 2015. Ploidy of USDA world pear germplasm collection determined by flow cytometry. Acta Hortic. 1094:75–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1094.6.
   Google Scholar
• Puskás, M., M. Hofer, R.E. Sestraş, A. Peil, A.F. Sestras, M.-V. Hanke, and H. Flachowsky. 2016. Molecular and flow cytometric evaluation of pear (Pyrus L.) genetic resources of the German and Romanian national fruit collections. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 63(6):1023–1033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0298-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pustahija, F., S.C. Brown, F. Bogunić, N. Bašić, E. Muratović, S. Ollier, O. Hidalgo, M. Bourge, V. Stevanović, and S. Siljak-Yakovlev. 2013. Small genomes dominate in plants growing on serpentine soils in West Balkans, an exhaustive study of 8 habitats covering 308 taxa. Plant Soil 373(1–2):427–453. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1794-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarikhani Khorami, S., K. Arzani, G. Karimzadeh, A. Shojaeiyan, and W. Ligterink. 2018. Genome size: A novel predictor of nut weight and nut size of walnut trees. HortScience 53(3):275–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12725-17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifani, M., V. Erfani, A. Bagerian, C. Nishtani, T. Yamamoto, and T. Kimura. 2008. Mutations in chloroplast dna revealed relations and discriminations in genus Pyrus. Acta Hortic. 800(800):355–364. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.800.45.
   Google Scholar
• Tarkesh Esfahani, S., G. Karimzadeh, and M.R. Naghavi. 2016. 2C DNA value of Persian poppy (Papaver bracteatum Lindl.) medicinal plant as revealed by flow cytometry analysis; quick effective criteria for distinguishing unidentified papaver species. Int. J. Adv. Biotechnol. Res. 7(2):573–578.
   Google Scholar
• Tavan, M., M.H. Mirjalili, and G. Karimzadeh. 2015. In vitro polyploidy induction: Changes in morphological, anatomical, and phytochemical characteristics of Thymus persicus (Lamiaceae). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 122(3):573–583. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0789-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, Y., and K. Tanabe. 2004. Reconsideration on the origin of cultivated pears native to East Asia. Acta Hortic. 634:175–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.634.21.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, Y., K. Tanabe, F. Tamura, and A. Itai. 2002. Genetic relationships of Pyrus species and cultivars native to East Asia revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 127(2):262–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.2.262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UPOV. (2000). Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity, and stability in Pear (Pyrus communis L.). International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Geneva, Switzerland. 43pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and K. Arzani. 2019. European Pear, p. 305–328. In: S.T. De Feritas and S. Pareek (eds.). Postharvest physiological disorders in fruits and vegetables. 1st. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, United Kingdom & New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, H., J. Li, Z. Peng, B. Lu, Z. Zhao, and W. Yang. 2008. Relationships of Aegilops tauschii revealed by DNA fingerprints: The evidence for agriculture exchange between China and the West. Prog. Nat. Sci. 18(12):1525–1531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, M.N. 1993. Temperate zone pomology. 3rd. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. p. 389.
   Google Scholar
• Yakimowski, S.B., and L.H. Rieseberg. 2014. The role of homoploid hybridization in evolution: A century of studies synthesizing genetics and ecology. Am. J. Bot. 101(8):1247–1258. doi: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarei, A., J. Erfani-Moghadam, and H. Jalilian. 2019. Assessment of variability within and among four Pyrus species using multivariate analysis. Flora 250:27–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielinski, Q.B., and M. Thompson. 1967. Speciation in Pyrus: Chromosome number and meiotic behavior. Botanical Gazette 128(2):109–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/336386.
   Google Scholar