The Effects of Different Rootstocks on the Graft Success and Stion Development of Some Pear Cultivars

References

• Baron, D., A.C.E. Amaro, A. Pina, and G. Ferreira. 2019. An overview of grafting re-establishment in woody fruit species. Scientia Hortic. 243:84–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barritt, B.H.. 1992. Intensive orchard management. Good fruit grower, Yakima, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R.L., H.A. Quamme, R.E.C. Layne, and R.M. Skirvin. 1996. Pears, p. 441–514. In: J. Janick and J.N. Moore (eds.). Fruit breeding; Volume I: Tree and tropical fruits. Wiley Science, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, Z.A., A.H. Pandit, M.W. Wani, and J.A. Rather. 2011. Effect of interstock on juvenility and tree size of Ambri apple. Acta Hortic. 903:435–437. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2011.903.58.
   Google Scholar
• Bolat, İ. 1993. Investıgatıon of some propertıes of nursery trees of temperate fruıts grown ın erzincan horticultural research institute. Atatürk Univ. J. Agric. Fac. 24(2):86–97.
   Google Scholar
• Buban, T. 2000. The use benzyladenine in orchard fruit growing: A mini review. Plant Growth Regul. 32(2–3):381–390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010785604339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetinbas, M., S. Butar, Y. Sesli, and B. Yaman. 2018. Effects of different cultivar/rootstock combinations on the some seedling characteristics for pear nursery growing. J. Agr. Fac. Gaziosmanpasa Univ. 35(special issue):8–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4499.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva, G.J., F. Villa, F. Grimaldi, P.S. Da Silva, and J.F. Welter. 2018. Pear (Pyrus spp.) breeding, p. 131–164. In: J.M. Al-Khayri, S.M. Jain, and D.V. Johnson (eds.). Advances in plant breeding strategies: Fruits. Vol. 3. Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91944-7_4.
   Google Scholar
• Darikova, J.A., Y.V. Savvaa, E.A. Vaganova, A.M. Gracheva, and G.V. Kuznetsova. 2011. Grafts of woody plants and the problem of incompatibility between scion and rootstock (a review). J. Siberian Fed. Univ. Biol. 1(4):54–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.17516/1997–1389–0185.
   Google Scholar
• Davarynejad, G.H., F. Shahriari, and H. Hamid. 2008. Identification of graft incompatibility of pear cultivars on Quince rootstock by using isozymes banding pattern and starch. Asian J. Plant Sci. 7(1):109–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2008.109.112.
   Google Scholar
• Dogra, K., K. Kour, R. Kumar, P. Bakshi, and V. Kumar. 2018. Graft-incompatibility in horticultural crops. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 7(2):1805–1820. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.218.
   Google Scholar
• Dolkar, T., A. Mansoor, B. Agleema, S. Divya, S. Lobzang, and K. Stanzin. 2018. Mitigation of temperate fruit crop problems through use of rootstock. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 6(2):880–887.
   Google Scholar
• Dondini, L., and S. Sansavini. 2012. European pear, p. 369–413. In: M.L. Badanes and D.H. Byrne (eds.). Handbook of Plant Breeding: Fruit Breeding. Springer, New York. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0763-9_11.
   Google Scholar
• Dun, E.A., B.J. Ferguson, and C.A. Beveridge. 2006. Apical dominance and shoot branching. Divergent opinions or divergent mechanism? Plant Physiol. 142:812–819. doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.086868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elivar, D.E., and H. Dumanoglu. 1999. The comparison of fall and spring budding for one-year-old nursery tree production of apple, pear and quince in Ayaş (Ankara). J. Agric. Sci. 5(2):58–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1501/10.501/tarimbil_0000000024.
   Google Scholar
• Ercisli, S. 2004. A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet. Resour. Crop Ev. . 51:419–435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/b:gres.0000023458.60138.79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermel, F.F., J. Kervella, A.M. Catesson, and J.C. Poessel. 1999. Localized graft incompatibility in pear/quince (Pyrus communis/Cydonia oblonga) combination: Multivariate analysis of histological data form 5-month-old grafts. Tree Physiol. 19:645–654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.10.645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermel, F.F., J.L. Poessel, M. Faurobert, and A.M. Catesson. 1997. Early scion/stock junction in compatible and incompatible pear/pear and pear/quince grafts: A histo-cytological study. Ann. Bot-London. 79:505–515. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo/79.5.505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errea, P. 1998. Implications of phenolic compounds in graft incompatibility in fruit tree species. Sci. Hortic. 74:195–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4238(98)00087-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT database collections. 2021. Food and agriculture organization statistical databases, agriculture, crop primary, pear production in the world.15 April 2021. http://faostat.fao.org.
   Google Scholar
• Francescatto, P., D. Pazzin, A.G. Neto, J.C. Fachinello, and C.L. Giacobbo. 2010. Evaluation of graft compatibility between quince rootstocks and pear scions. Acta Hortic. 872:253–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2010.872.34.
   Google Scholar
• Gulen, H., R. Arora, A. Kuden, S.L. Krebs, and J. Postman. 2002. Peroxidase isozyme profiles in compatible and incompatible pear-quince graft combinations, J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127(2):152–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.127.2.152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J.F., and G.A. Lobos. 2008. Pears, p. 299–335. In: J.F. Hancock (ed.). Temperate fruit crop breeding: germplasm to genomics. Springer, New York. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6907-9_10.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, H.T., D.E. Kester Jr., F.T. Davies, and R.L. Geneve. 2011. Plant propagation: Principles and practices. 8th ed. Regents/Prentice Hall International Edition. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Hrotko, K., and L. Magyar. 2004. Effect of depth of planting/budding height and solar radiation exposure of ‘M.26ʹ, ‘MM.106ʹ rootstocks and ‘B.9ʹ/’MM’ interstems on the growth and yield of ‘Idared’ apple trees. Acta Hortic. 658:69–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2004.658.6.
   Google Scholar
• Hudina, M., P. Orazem, J. Jakopic, and F. Stampar. 2014. The phenolic content and its involvement in the graft incompatibility process of various pear rootstocks (Pyrus communis L.). J. Plant Physiol. 171:76–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J.E. 2003. Biology of apples and pears. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542657.
   Google Scholar
• Johann, G. 1983. Effect of growth regulators on branching habit of some apple cultivars in the nursery. Acta Hortic. 137:87–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1983.137.8.
   Google Scholar
• Kadan, H., and T. Yarılgac. 2005. Studies on propagation by dormant t-budding of apples and pears under Van ecological conditions. Y.Y.Univ. J. Agr. Sci. 15(2):167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, W.J., and M.E.D. Alexander. 2008. Grafting & Budding. A Practical Guide for Fruit and Nut Plants and Ornamentals. Landlinks Press, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Leyser, O. 2003. Regulation of shoot branching by auxin. Trends Plant Sci. 8:541–545. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2003.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, B.D., M. Magro, L. Rufato, A. Bogo, and A.A. Kreztschmar. 2016. Graft compatibility between european pear cultivars and east malling “C” rootstock. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 39(3):e–063. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452017063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magyar, L., Z. Barancsi, A. Dickmann, and K. Hrotko. 2008. Application of biostimulators in nursery. Bull. UASVM, Hortic. 65(1):515–519.
   Google Scholar
• Musacchi, S., A. Masia, and J. Fachinello. 2002. Vvariation of some enzymatic activities in relationship to scion/stock compatibility in pear/ quince combinations. Acta Hortic. 596:389–392. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.596.61.
   Google Scholar
• Ongaro, V., and O. Leyser. 2008. Hormonal control of shoot branching. J. Exp. Bot. 59:67–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özçağıran, R., A.Ü nal, E.Ö zeker, and M.İ sfendiyaroğlu. 2005. Ilıman İklim Meyve Türleri, Yumuşak Çekirdekli Meyveler, Cilt-II, 73–126.Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınlarıİzmir, Türkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk, A., and B. Ozturk. 2014. The rootstock influences growth and development of ‘Deveci’ Pear. Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci. 1:1049–1053.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk, A., and L. Demirsoy. 2013. Promising pear genotypes from North Anatolia, Turkey: Preliminary observations. J. Am. Pomolog. Soc. 67(4):217–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, A., U. Serdar, and G. Balci. 2009. The influence of different nursery conditions on graft success and plant survival using the inverted radicle grafting method on the chestnut. Acta Hortic. 815:193–197. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2009.815.25.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk, B., M. Ozcan, and A. Ozturk. 2011. Effects of different rootstock diameters and budding periods on graft success and plant growth in kiwifruit seedling production. J. Agric. Sci. 17(4):261–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pektas, M., F.A. Canli, and S. Ozongun. 2009. Winter grafts as alternative methods to t-budding in pear (Pyrus communis L.) propagation. Int. J. Nat. Eng. Sci. 3(1):91–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pina, A., and P. Errea. 2005. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility–incompatibility. Sci. Hortic. 106:1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pio, R., E.A. Chagas, and A.F.C. Tombolato. 2008. Interspecific and intergeneric pear, apple and quince grafting using Pyrus calleryana as rootstock. Acta Hortic. 800:173–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2008.800.97.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan, J.D. 1978. The use of growth regulators for shaping young fruit trees. Acta Hortic. 80:39–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1978.80.3.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, J., M. Aftab, M.A. Rauf, K.U. Rahman, W. Bilal, and F.G. Ayub. 2017. Comparative study on compatibility and growth response of pear varieties on different rootstocks at nursery. Pure Appl. Biol. 6(1):286–292. doi: https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2017.60026.
   Google Scholar
• Rom, R.C., and R.F. Carlson. 1987. Rootstocks for fruit crops. Wiley and Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Saracoglu, O., and U. Cebe. 2018. Cyclanilide treatments increase lateral branching of apple and pear nursery trees. Appl. Ecol. Env. Res. 16(4):4575–4583. doi: https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1604_45754583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., A.S. Rehalia, and S.D. Sharma. 2009. Vegetative growth restriction in pome and stone fruits. Agric. Rev. 30(1):13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu-Sato, S., M. Tanaka, and H. Mori. 2009. Auxin–cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branch. Plant Mol. Biol. 69:429–435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-008-9416-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soylu, A., and H. Basyigit. 1991. Growth and branching characteristics of some fruit saplings produced in Bursa Kestel region. The First Turkish Arboriculture Symposium. Ankara, Turkey, 26–28 Dec.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, R.A. 2008. Pyrus betulifolia is the best rootstock for the ‘Coscia’ pear in the warm climate of Israel. Acta Hortic. 800:631–638. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2008.800.84.
   Google Scholar
• Taiz, L., and E. Zeiger. 2003. Plant Physiology. 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates Press. Sunderland, UK. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg079.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J. 1991. Rootstock affects primary scaffold branch crotch angle of apple trees. Hortscience 26(10):1266–1267. doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.26.10.1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, A.D. 1995. Rootstock and interstock effects on deciduous fruit tree vigour, precocity, and yield productivity. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 23(4):373–382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.1995.9513913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, M.N. 1995. Temperate-zone pomology, physiology and culture. 3rd ed. Timber Pres, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Zenginbal, E., and S.Z. Bostan. 2019. Pear sapling production in greenhouse and external environment. Bahçe 48(2):57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Zenginbal, H., T. Demir, H. Demirsoy, and O. Beyhan. 2017. The grafting success of fourteen genotypes grafted on three different rootstocks on production of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) sapling. Acta Sci. Pol-Hortoru 16(1):133–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2017.1.0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar