Determination of Raspberry Cultivar Authenticity Based on Multiplexed Microsatellite Fingerprinting

References

• Akin, M., A. Nyberg, J. Postman, S. Mehlenbacher, and N.V. Bassil. 2016. A multiplexed microsatellite fingerprinting set for hazelnut cultivar identification. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 81(6):327–338. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ejhs.2016/81.6.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsellem, L., C. Dutech, and N. Billotte. 2001. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae), an invasive weed in La Réunion island. Mol. Ecol. Notes 1(1–2):33–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8278.2000.00013.x.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, N.R.F., B.M. Reed, J. Graham, F. Fernández-Fernández, and N.V. Bassil. 2010. Microsatellite markers for raspberry and blackberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci 135(3):1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.135.3.271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congiu, L., M. Chicca, R. Cella, R. Rossi, and G. Bernacchia. 2000. The use of random amplified polymorphic dna (RAPD) markers to identify strawberry varieties: A forensic application. Mol. Ecol. 9:229–232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00811.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dice, L.R. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 26:297–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1932409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossett, M., N.V. Bassil, and C.E. Finn. 2012. SSR fingerprinting of black raspberry cultivars shows discrepancies in identification. Acta Hort. 946. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2012.946.4.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J.J., and J.L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19(1):11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ercisli, S., I. Badjakov, V. Kondakova, A. Atanassov, and E. Todorovska. 2008. AFLP-based genetic relationships in wild and cultivated red raspberry genotypes (Rubus idaeus L.). Biotechnol. Biotec. Eq. 22(4):907–910. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2008.10817576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2020. Food and agricultural commodities production. 16 Sept 2020. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Fernández, F., L. Antanaviciute, C.L. Govan, and D.J. Sargent. 2011. Development of a multiplexed microsatellite set for fingerprinting red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) germplasm and its transferability to other Rubus species. J. Berry Res. 1(4):177–187. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/jbr-2011-019.
   Google Scholar
• Girichev, V., M.V. Hanke, A. Peil, and H. Flachowsky. 2015. SSR fingerprinting of a German Rubus collection and pedigree based evaluation on trueness-to-type. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 64:189–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0345-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., K. Smith, K. MacKenzie, L. Jorgenson, C. Hackett, and W. Powell. 2004. The construction of a genetic linkage map of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus subsp. idaeus) based on AFLPs, genomic-SSR and EST-SSR markers. Theor. App. Genet. 109:740–749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1687-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., K. Smith, M. Woodhead, and J. Russel. 2002. Development and use of simple sequence repeat SSR markers in Rubus species. Mol. Ecol. 2:250–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00203.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, M.J., T.M. Nguyen, A. Waterman, and K.J. Chalmers. 2008. Multiplex-Ready PCR: A new method for multiplexed SSR and SNP genotyping. BMC Genomics. 9:80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirata, C., T. Waki, K. Shimomura, T. Wada, S. Tanaka, H. Ikegami, Y. Uchimura, K. Hirashima, Y. Nakazawa, K. Okada, et al. 2020. DNA markers based on retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms can detect short DNA fragments for strawberry cultivar identification. Breed. Sci. 70:231–240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.19116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honjo, M., T. Nunome, S. Kataoka, T. Yano, H. Yamazaki, M. Hamano, S. Yui, and M. Morishita. 2011. Strawberry cultivar identification based on hypervariable SSR markers. Breed. Sci. 61(4):420 425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.61.420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali, S.H., J. Cockram, and L.T. Hickey. 2019. Insights into deployment of DNA markers in plant variety protection and registration. Theor. App. Genet. 132:1911–1929. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03348-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalia, R.K., M.K. Rai, S. Kalia, R. Singh, and A.K. Dhawn. 2011. Microsatellite markers: An overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica. 177:309–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0286-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunihisa, M. 2011. Studies using DNA markers in Fragaria × ananassa: Genetic analysis, genome structure, and cultivar identification. J. Japan Soc. Hort. Sci. 80(3):231–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.80.231.
   Google Scholar
• Kunihisa, M., N. Fukino, and S. Matsumoto. 2003. Development of cleavage amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers for identification of strawberry cultivars. Euphytica. 134:209–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/b:euph.0000003884.19248.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T.C., J. Slate, L.E.B. Kruuk, and J.M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 7:639–655. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x.
   Google Scholar
• Miyashita, T., H. Kunitake, N. Yotsukura, and Y. Hoshino. 2015. Assessment of genetic relationships among cultivated and wild Rubus accessions using AFLP markers. Sci. Hortic. 193:165–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noli, E., M.S. Teriaca, M.C. Sanguineti, and S. Conti. 2008. Utilization of SSR and AFLP markers for the assessment of distinctness in durum wheat. Mol. Breed. 22:301–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-008-9176-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nybom, H., and G. Lācis. 2021. Large-scale genotyping and phenotyping of plant genetic resources of vegetatively propagated crops. Plants 10(2):1–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020415.
   Google Scholar
• Perrier, X., and J.P. Jacquemoud-Collet. 2005. DARwin-5.0. Dissimilarity analysis and representation for Windows. User’s manual. CIRAD, Montpellier
   Google Scholar
• Pinczinger, D., M. von Reth, M.V. Hanke, and H. Flachowsky. 2020. SSR fingerprinting of raspberry cultivars traded in Germany clearly showed that certainty about the genotype authenticity is a prerequisite for any horticultural experiment. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 85(2):79–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ejhs.2020/85.2.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafalski, J.A., and S.V. Tingey. 1993. Genetic diagnostics in plant-breeding– RAPDs, microsatellites and machines. Trends Genet. 9:275–280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(93)90013-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simlat, M., A. Ptak, A. Kula, and A. Orzel. 2018. Assessment of genetic variability among raspberry accessions using molecular markers. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus. 17(5):61–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2018.5.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šiško, M., B. Javornik, A. Šiftar, and A. Ivančič. 2009. Genetic relationships among Slovenian pears assessed by molecular markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 134:97–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.134.1.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umar, G., H.K. Vasanthaiah, D. Kambiranda, S.M. Basha, B.R. Phills, and W. Hunter. 2010. Assessment of genetic diversity among selected raspberry cultivars. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 123:26–28.
   Google Scholar
• UPOV (International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants). 2006. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability: Raspberry - Rubus subg. Rubus. UPOV, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Y. Wu, D.L. Martin, H. Gao, T. Samuels, and C. Tan. 2010. Identification of vegetatively propagated turf bermudagrass cultivars using simple sequence repeat markers. Crop Sci. 50:2103–2111. doi: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.02.0116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar