Effect of Humic Acid, Nitrogen Concentrations and Application Method on the Morphological, Yield and Biochemical Characteristics of Strawberry ‘Paros’

References

• A.O.A.C. 1989. Official methods of analysis, 14th ed. Association of Official Agricultural Chemist, Washington. DC. 241–254
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, T., S. Ahmad, M. Ashraf, M. Adnan Shahid, M. Yasin, R. Mukhtar Balal, M.A. Pervez, and S. Abbas. 2013. Effect of humic and application at different growth stages of kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata blanco) on the basis of physio-biochemical and reproductive responses. Academia J. Biotechnol. 1:014–020. doi: 10.15413/ajb.2012.0106.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Mawgoud, A.M.R., N.H.M. El-Greadly, Y.I. Helmy, and S.M. Singer. 2007. Responses of tomato plants to different rates of humic-based fertilizer and NPK fertilization. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 3:169–174.
   Google Scholar
• Adani, F., P. Genevini, P. Zaccheo, and G. Zocchi. 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 21(3):561–575. doi: 10.1080/01904169809365424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, I., R.U. Saquib, M. Qasim, M. Saleem, A. Sattar Khan, and M. Yaseen. 2013. Humic acid and cultivar effects on growth, yield, vase life, and corm characteristics of gladiolus. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 73:339–344. doi: 10.4067/S0718-58392013000400002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allahvirdizadeh, N., and M.J. Nazari Deljou. 2014. Effect of humic acid on morph-physiological traits, nutrients uptake and postharvest vase life of pot marigold cut flower (Calendula officinalis cv. Crysantha) in hydroponic system. Ejgcst 5:133–143.
   Google Scholar
• Aman, S., and A. Rab. 2013. Response of tomato to nitrogen levels with or without humic acid. Sarhad J. Agric 29:181–186.
   Google Scholar
• Ameri, A., and A. Tehranifar. 2012. Effect of humic acid on nutrient uptake and physiological characteristic Fragaria ananassa var: Camarosa. J. Biol. Environ. Sci. 16:77–79. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1049.54.
   Google Scholar
• Aminifard, M.H., H. Aroiee, M. Azizi, H. Nemati, and H.Z.E. Jaafar. 2013. Effect of compost on antioxidant components and fruit quality of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Cent. Eur. Agric 14(2):525–534. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/14.2.1232.
   Google Scholar
• Aminifard, M.H., H. Aroiee, H. Fatemi, A. Ameri, and S. Karimpour. 2010. Responses of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) to different rates of nitrogen under field conditions. J. Cent. Eur. Agric 11(4):453–458. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/11.4.863.
   Google Scholar
• Arnon, A.N. 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agron J 23:112–121.
   Google Scholar
• Ayala-Zavala, J.F., S.Y. Wang, Z. Gonzale, and G.A. Aguilar. 2007. High oxygen treatment increases antioxidant capacity and postharvest life of strawberry fruit. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 45:166–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibordi, M., M.J. Malakoti, H. Amirmakri, and M. Nafisi. 2000. Production and optimum consumption of chemical fertilizer in sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Education Press, Tehran, 1–282.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and T. Aviad. 1990. Effects of humic substances on plant growth, p. 161–186. In: P. MacCarthy, C.E. Clapp, R.L. Malcom, and P.R. Bloom (eds.). Humic substances in soils and crop science: Selected readings. Soil Science Society of America, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Denre, M., P.K. Bandopadhyay, A. Chakravarty, S. Pal, and A. Bhattacharya. 2014. Effect of foliar application of humic acid, zinc and boron on biochemical changes related to productivity of pungent pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Afr. J. Plant Sci. 8:320–335. doi: 10.5897/AJPS2014.1155.
   Google Scholar
• Ehsan, S., S. Javed, I. Saleem, F. Habib, and T. Majeed. 2014. Effect of humic acid foliar spraying and nitrogen fertilizers management on wheat yield. Int. J. Agron. Agric. Res 4:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• El-Bassioung, H.S.M., B.A. Bakry, A.A. El-Monem Attia, and M.M. Abd Allah. 2014. Physiological role of humic acid and nicotinamide on improving plant growth, yield, and mineral nutrient of wheat (Triticum durum) grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil. Agric. Sci. 5:687–700. doi: 10.4236/as.2014.58072.
   Google Scholar
• El-Nemr, M.A., M. El-Desuki, A.M. El-Bassiony, and Z.F. Fawzy. 2012. Response of growth and yield of cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) to different foliar applications of humic acid and bio-stimulators. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci 6:630–637.
   Google Scholar
• Eshghi, S., and M. Garazhian. 2015. Improving growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry by foliar and soil drench applications of humic acid. Iran Agric. Res 34:14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrante, A., A. Spinardi, T. Maggiore, A. Testoni, and P.M. Gallina. 2008. Effect of nitrogen fertilisation levels on melon fruit quality at the harvest time and during storage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 88(4):707–713. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, G., and G. Brunetti. 2010. Effects of the times of application of a soil humic acid on berry quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cv Italia. Span. J. Agric. Res. 8(3):817–822. doi: 10.5424/1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2015. FAOSTAT agricultural statics database. 15 April 2016.http://faostat3.fao.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ganjehi, B., and A. Golchin. 2012. The effect of different levels of N, K and Mg on yield and growth indices of strawberry in hydroponic culture. Ejgcst 2:71–81. In Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Haghighi, M., M. Kafi, and P. Fang. 2012. Photosynthetic activity and N metabolism of lettuce as affected by humic acid. Int. J. Veg. Sci 18(2):182–189. doi: 10.1080/19315260.2011.605826.
   Google Scholar
• Hassegawa, R.H., Fonseca, H., Fan celli, A.L., Dasilva, V.N., Schammass, E.A., Reis, T.A.,Corrêa, B. 2008. Influence of macro-and micro nutrient fertilization on fungal contamination and fumonisin production in corn grains. Food Control. 19: 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, M.M., S. Burcher, and L.L. Ching. 2008. Food futures now. ISIS TWN Report. P. 2. 3 April, 2016. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/foodFutures.php/
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini Farahi, M., A. Aboutalebi, S. Eshghi, M. Dastyaran, and F. Yosefi. 2013. Foliar application of humic acid on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of ˏAromasˏstrawberry in soilless culture. Agric. Commun 1:13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Iran Meteorological Organization. 2016. https://data.irimo.ir/.
   Google Scholar
• Kamari, S.S. 2014. Acid humic foliar application affects fruit quality characteristics of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv.Izabella). Agric. Sci. Dev 10:312–316.
   Google Scholar
• Kashi, A. K., Hekmati J. 1991. Growing Strawberries. Ahmadi Press. Tehran, Iran. 121p. (In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, M. 2013. Effect of foliar application of humic acid and potassium nitrate on cucumber growth. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 11:03–06.
   Google Scholar
• Krueskopf, H.H., J.P. Mitchell, T.K. Hartz, D.M. May, E.M. Miyao, and M.D. Cahn. 2002. Pre-sidedress soil nitrate testingidentifies processing tomato fields not requiring sidedress N fertilizer. Hortic. Science 37:520–524.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, M., S. Samavat, M. Mostafavi, A. Khalighi, and A. Cherati. 2013. The effects of proline and humic acid on quantitative properties of kiwifruit. Int. Res. J. Appl. Basic Sci. 6:1117–1119.
   Google Scholar
• Molaei, M. 2011. Relative advantage of producing agriculturalcrops in Ardabil Province (Iran). World Appl. Sci. J. 15:860–866.
   Google Scholar
• Moraditochaee, M. 2012. Effectsof humic acid folior spraying and nitrogen fertilizer management on yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Iran. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 7:289–293.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, S., D. Pizzeghello, A. Muscolo, and A. Vianello. 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34(11):1527–1536. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00174-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderi, G., S. Mohammadi, A. Imani, M. Karami. 2014. Habitat selection of Williams’ Jerboa (Allactaga williamsi Thomas, 1897) in Ardabil Province, Iran. Turkish Journal of Zoology. 38, 432–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okie, W.R. 2000. Register of new fruit and nut varieties, List 40. Hortic. Sci. 35:812–826.
   Google Scholar
• Pena-Mendez, M., J. Havel, and J. Patocka. 2005. Humic substances-compounds of still unknown structure: applications in agriculture, industry, environment, and biomedicine. J. Appl. Biomed. 3:13–24. doi: 10.32725/jab.2005.002.
   Google Scholar
• Pinton, R., S. Cesco, G. Iacolettig, S. Astolfi, and Z. Varanini. 1999. Modulation of NO−3uptake bywater-extractable humic substances: Involvement of root plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Plant Soil. 215:155–161. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodas, C.L., I.P. Silva, and V.A.T. Coelho. 2013. Chemical properties and rates of external color of strawberry fruitsgrown using nitrogen and potassium fertigation. IDESIA (Chile). 31:53–58. doi: 10.4067/S0718-34292013000100007.
   Google Scholar
• Salman, S.R., S.D. Abou-hussein, A.M.R. Abdel-Mawgoud, and M.A. El-Nemr. 2005. Fruit yield and quality of watermelon as affected by hybrids and humic acid application. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 1:51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sarhan, T.Z., G.H. Mohammad, and J.A. Teli. 2011. Effects of humic acid and bread yeast on growth and yield of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). J. Agric. Sci. Technol 1:1091–1096.
   Google Scholar
• Tabataba’i, J. 2013. Principles of mineral nutrition of plants. Publications Tabriz university. Iran. 1–544, In Persian
   Google Scholar
• Tai-bo, C., W. Zhen-lin, L. Lan-ian, W. Ru-Juan, C. Xiao-guang, Z. Xiao-dong, and S. Chun-yu. 2007. Effects of humic acid urea on yield and nitrogen absorption, assimilation and quality of ginger. J. Plant Nutr. Fert 13:903.
   Google Scholar
• Zeinali, A., and P. Moradi. 2015. The effects of humic acid and ammonium sulfate foliar spraying and their interaction effects on the qualitative and quantitative yield of native garlic (Allium sativum L.). J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci 4:205–211.
   Google Scholar