Automated Writing Assessment in the Classroom

REFERENCES

• Attali , Y. 2004 . “ Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) ” . In Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion. San Diego, CA April
   Google Scholar
• Attali , Y. and Burstein , J. 2004 . “ Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment ” . In Automated essay scoring with e-rater V.2.0. Philadelphia, PA June
   Google Scholar
• Baron , D. 1998 . “ When professors get A's and the machines get F's ” . In Chronicle of Higher Education, A56 November 20
   Google Scholar
• Burstein , J. 2003 . “ The e-rater scoring engine: Automated essay scoring with natural language processing ” . In Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective , Edited by: Shermis , M. D. and Burstein , J. 113 – 121 . Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Butler-Nalin , K. 1984 . “ Revising patterns in students' writing ” . In Contexts for learning to write , Edited by: Applebee , A. N. 121 – 133 . Ablex .
   Google Scholar
• Cheville , J. 2004 . Automated scoring technologies and the rising influence of error . English Journal , 93 ( 4 ) : 47 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow , M. and Burstein , J. C. 2004 . Beyond essay length: Evaluating e-rater's performance on TOEFL essays , Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , Y. , Ben-Simon , A. and Hovav , M. 2003 . “ Paper presented at the 29th Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment ” . In The effect of specific language features on the complexity of systems for automated essay scoring. Manchester, , UK
   Google Scholar
• Conference on College Composition and Communication. (2004). CCCC position statement on teaching, learning, and assessing writing in digital environments. http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/123773.htm (Accessed: 21 September 2006 ).
   Google Scholar
• Elliot , S. M. and Mikulas , C. 2004 . “ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association ” . In The impact of MY Access!™ use on student writing performance: A technology overview and four studies. San Diego, CA April
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson , P. F. 2006 . “ The meaning of meaning ” . In Machine scoring of human essays: Truth or consequences , Edited by: Ericsson , P. F. and Haswell , R. 28 – 37 . Logan : Utah State University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson , P. F. and Haswell , R. 2006 . Machine scoring of human essays: Truth and consequences , Logan : Utah State University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Flower , L. 1984 . “ Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing ” . In Composing in a second language , Edited by: McKay , S. 16 – 42 . New York : Newbury House .
   Google Scholar
• Hillocks , G. J. 1986 . Research on written composition , Urbana, IL : ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and NCTE .
   Google Scholar
• Huot , B. 1996 . Computers and assessment: Understanding two technologies . Computers and Composition , 13 ( 2 ) : 231 – 243 .
   Google Scholar
• Keith , T. Z. 2003 . “ Validity and automated essay scoring systems ” . In Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective , Edited by: Shermis , M. D. and Burstein , J. C. 147 – 167 . Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Kling, R. (1999). What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine, 5(1). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january99/kling/01kling.html (Accessed: 14 June 2007 ).
   Google Scholar
• Kulik , J. A. 2003 . Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say , Arlington, VA : SRI .
   Google Scholar
• Landauer , T. K. , Laham , D. and Foltz , P. 2003 . “ Automated scoring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay Assessor ” . In Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective , Edited by: Shermis , M. D. and Burstein , J. 87 – 112 . Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Nass , C. and Moone , Y. 2000 . Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers . Journal of Social Issues , 56 ( 1 ) : 81 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing in America's Schools and Colleges . 2003 . The neglected “r”: The need for a writing revolution , New York : The College Entrance Examination Board .
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski , W. and Robey , D. 1991 . Information technology and the structuring of organizations . Information Systems Research , 2 ( 2 ) : 143 – 169 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers , D. E. , Burstein , J. C. , Chodorow , M. , Fowles , M. E. and Kukich , K. 2002 . Stumping e-rater: Challenging the validity of automated essay scoring . Computers in Human Behavior , 18 : 103 – 134 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves , B. and Nass , C. 2003 . The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , California : Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford, CA: Stanford University .
   Google Scholar
• Shermis , M. D. and Burstein , J. 2003 . Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective , Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Shermis , M. D. , Burstein , J. C. and Bliss , L. 2004 . “ Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education ” . In The impact of automated essay scoring on high stakes writing assessments. San Diego, CA April
   Google Scholar
• Shermis , M. D. , Mzumara , H. R. , Olson , J. and Harrington , S. 2001 . On-line grading of student essays: PEG goes on the World Wide Web . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 26 ( 3 ) : 247 – 259 .
   Google Scholar
• Slayton, J., Llosa, L. (2002). Evaluation of the Waterford Early Reading Program 2001–2002: Implementation and student achievement http://notebook.lausd.net/pls/ptl/url/ITEM/EF8A0388690A90E4E0330A081FB590E4 (Accessed: 21 September 2006 ).
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer , M. and Ware , P. 2006 . Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda . Language Teaching Research , 10 ( 2 ) : 157 – 180 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar