In amongst the glitter and the squashed blueberries: crafting a collaborative lens for children’s literacy pedagogy in a community setting

References

• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham, NC: Duke Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (2007). Practice as research. Chippenham: UK I.B. Tauris and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (2012). Arts based research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriard, N. (1998). Relational aesthetics. Paris: Les Presse Du Reel.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., Craft, A., Cremin, T., Duffy, B., Hanson, R., & Keene, R. (2006). Documenting possibility thinking: A journey of collaborative inquiry. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(3), 243–262. doi:10.1080/09669760600880001
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, E., & Lassiter, L. E. (2010). From collaborative ethnography to collaborative pedagogy: Reflections on the other side of middletown project and community-university research partnerships. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 41(4), 370–385. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, E., & Lassiter, L. E. (2015). Doing ethnography today: Theories, methods, exercises. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coessens, K., Crispin, D., & Douglas, A. (2009). The artistic turn: A manifesto. Ghent: The Orpheus Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the primary curriculum: Framing and developing practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. ((2005) [1934]). Art as experience. New York: Perigee.
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan, R. (2002). Communicating. The multiple modes of human interconnection. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R. (2008). Multimodal literacies. In J. Marsh & E. Hallet (Eds.), Desirable literacies: Approaches to language and literacy in the early years (pp. 140–161). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M. (2010). Going with the flow or back to normal? The impact of creative practitioners in schools and classrooms. Research Papers in Education, 25, 355–375. 10.1080/02671520903082429
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (2000). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, S. M. (2015) Tip-toeing past the fear: Becoming a music educator by attending to personal music experiences. Narrative Inquiries into Curriculum Making in Teacher Education, 169–192. doi:10.1108/S1479-3687(2011)00000130012
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, A. (2014a). Zigging and zooming all over the place: Young children’s meaning making and movement in the museum. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(1), 5–27. doi:10.1177/1468798412453730
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, A. (2014b). How do families with young children (2-4 years old) make meaning in a museum? Unpublished thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, A. (2016). Parents as researchers. Collaborative ethnography with parents. Qualitative research. doi:10.1177/1468794116672913
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B., & Wolf, S. (2004). Visual learning in the community school. London: Creative Partnerships.
   Google Scholar
• Heydon, R., & Rowsell, J. (2015). Phenomenology and literacy studies. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 454–472). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G., Stornaiuolo, A., & Sahni, U. (2010). Cultural citizenship and cosmopolitan practice: Global youth communicate online. English Education, 42(4), 331–367.
   Google Scholar
• Hvit, S. (2015). Literacy events in toddler groups: Preschool educators’ talk about their work with literacy among toddlers. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 311–330. doi:10.1177/1468798414526427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2007). Lines. A brief history. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2014). That’s enough about ethnography. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 383–395. doi:10.14318/hau4.1.021
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Creative teaching and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87. doi:10.1080/0305569032000159750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2010). Embodied knowing through art. In M. Biggs & H. Karlsson (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts (pp. 141–152). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G. (2004). Conversation pieces: Community and communication in modern art. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G. (2011). The one and the many: Contemporary collaborative art in a global context. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1997). Before writing. Rethinking paths to literacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, C. R., Gutshall Rucker, T., & Kirchhofer, J. M. (2015). ‘Go be a writer!’: Intra-activity with materials, time and space in literacy learning. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 394–419. doi:10.1177/1468798414566702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, L. E., Goodall, H., Campbell, E., & Johnson, M. N. (2004). The other side of middletown: Exploring Muncie’s African American community. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, J., Webster, S., & Hopper, M. (2011). Community coauthoring: Whose voice remains? Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 42(2), 134–153. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going Beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education. Introducing an intra active pedagogy. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lercercle, J. (2002). Deleuze and language. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2016). The refrain of the A-Grammatical child: Finding another language in/for qualitative research. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies. 16(2), 173-182.
   Google Scholar
• MacRae, C. (2011). Making Payton’s rocket: Heterotopia and lines of flight. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(1), 102–112. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavers, D. (2011). Children’s drawing and writing: The remarkable in the unremarkable. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLennan, D. M. P. (2010). Process or product? The argument for aesthetic exploration in the early years. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(2), 81–85. doi:10.1007/s10643-010-0411-3
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (2012). Practice as research in the arts. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, L. H. (2013). Taking children’s questions seriously: The need for creative thought. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(3), 230–253. doi:10.2304/gsch.2013.3.3.230
   Google Scholar
• Pagis, M. (2010). Producing intersubjectivity in silence: An ethnographic study of meditation practice. Ethnography, 11(2), 309–328. doi:10.1177/1466138109339041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, K. (1999). Transformations: Children´s meaning making in a nursery. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K. (2008). Looking with a different eye: Creativity and literacy in the early years. In J. Marsh & E. Hallet (Eds.), Desirable literacies: Approaches to language and literacy in the early years (pp. 140–161). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., & Pool, S. (2011). ‘Living your life because it’s the only life you’ve got’: Participatory research as a site for discovery in a creative project in a primary school in Thurnscoe UK. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 17–37. doi:10.3316/QRJ1102017
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K. (2014). Materializing literacies in communities: The uses of literacy revisited. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pool, S., & Pahl, K. (2015). The work of art in the age of mechanical co-production. In D. O’Brien & P. Mathews (Eds.), After urban regeneration: Communities policy and place (pp. 79–94). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rautio, P. (2014). Mingling and imitating in producing spaces for knowing and being: Insights from a finnish study of child–matter intra-action. Childhood, 21(4), 461–474. doi:10.1177/0907568213496653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J. (2015). Same meaning, different production. In E. Stirling & D. Yamada-Rice (Eds.), Visual methods with children and young people (pp. 17–28). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Safford, K., & Barrs, M. (2005). Creativity and literacy-many routes to meaning: Children’s language and literacy learning in creative arts projects. London: CLPE.
   Google Scholar
• Sakr, M., Connelly, V., & Wild, M. (2016). Imitative or Iconoclastic? How young children use ready-made images in digital art. International Journal of Art and Design Education. doi:10.1111/jade.12104/full
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. (2007). Evaluating creative partnerships: The challenge of defining impact. In This much we know Thinkpiece: The challenge of defining impact. London: Creative Partnerships, Arts Council England.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. (2013). Water in a dry land: Place-learning through art and story. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. (2015). Emergent literacies in ‘the land of do anything you want’. In M. Somerville & M. Green (Eds.), Children, place and sustainability (pp. 106–125). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, J. (2015). Vibrant matter: The intra-active role of objects in the construction of young children’s literacies. Literacy Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 64, 112–131.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudevan, L. (2011). An invitation to unknowing. Teachers College Record, 113(6), 1154–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasudevan, L., & DeJaynes, T. (2013). Becoming “Not Yet”. Adolescents making and remaking themselves in art-full spaces. In L. Vasudevan & T. DeJaynes (Eds.), Arts, media and justice: Multimodal explorations with youth (pp. 10–26). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1958). Culture and society (pp. 1780–1950). London: Chatto and Windus.
   Google Scholar