Implementing self-assessment in Singapore primary schools: effects on students’ perceptions of self-assessment

References

• Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of Formative Assessment (pp. 90–105). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159–181. doi:10.1080/02602930600801928
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. L. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3–13. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. doi:10.1080/00405840802577544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for Learning: 10 principles research- based principles to guide classroom practice. London, UK: Author. http://www.qca.org.uk/libraryAssets/media/4031_afl_principles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. (1997). Testing: friend or foe?: Theory and practice of assessment and testing (Master classes in education). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001a). Feedback in questioning and marking: The science teacher’s role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 82(301), 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001b). Self- and peer-assessment and taking responsibility: The science student’s role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 83(302), 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21. doi:10.1177/003172170408600105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: School of Education, King’s College. See also Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2008). Young children assess their learning: The power of the quick check strategy. Young Children, 63(6), 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Glasner, A. (Eds.). (1999). Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches. Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S. (2007). Assessing ‘inexperienced’ students’ ability to self-assess: Exploring links with learning style and academic personal control. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 313–330. doi:10.1080/02602930600896704
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, Y. M. (1998). The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore. Language and Education, 12, 192–209. doi:10.1080/09500789808666748
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. (2006). Assessment – A powerful lever for learning. Brock Education, 16(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, L. H. (2002). In-service training in alternative assessment with Singapore mathematics teachers. The Mathematics Educator, 6(2), 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 407–417. doi:10.1111/bjep.1994.64.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S. (2011). Mathematics intervention at the secondary prevention level of a multitier prevention system: Six key principles. Retrieved from http://www.rtinetwork.org/essential/tieredinsstruction/tier2/mathintervention.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(3), 365— 379.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, D., Chan, M., Rahim, R., Kwek, D., Khin, M. A., Loo, S. C., … Luo, W. S. (2013). Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Review of Education, 1(1), 57–106. doi:10.1002/rev3.3002
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2011). Towards a personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 353–367. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.486859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer-Dahl, A., & Kwek, D. (2011). Reading the home and reading in school: Framing deficit constructions as learning difficulties in Singapore English classrooms. In C. Wyatt-Smith, J. Elkins, & S. Gunn (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on difficulties in learning literacy and numeracy (pp. 159–178). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, K. H., Lee, A. N., Tan, W., Wong, H. M., & Guo, L. B. (2005, May). Looking collaboratively at the quality of teachers’ assessment tasks and student work in Singapore schools. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education – Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, K., Lee, A. N., Gong, W. G., & Wong, H. M. (2006). Development of the Singapore prototype classroom assessment tasks: Innovative tools for improving student learning and performance. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference International Association for Educational Assessment, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, K., & Luke, A. (2009). Authentic and conventional assessment in Singapore schools: An empirical study of teacher assignments and student work. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 291–318. doi:10.1080/09695940903319703
   Google Scholar
• Lasonen, J. (1995). A case study of student self-assessment in upper secondary education. Contemporary issues of occupational education in Finland, 199–215. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED386561)
   Google Scholar
• Leach, L. (2012). Optional self-assessment: Some tensions and dilemmas. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 137–147. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.515013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 209–220. doi:10.1080/0969594032000121289
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational HORIZONS, 87(1), 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (MOE). (1998). Learning, creating, communicating: A curriculum review. Retrieved July 11, 2000, from http://www1.moe.edu.sg/speeches/Curry%20Revue%20Report.htm
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2004). To light a fire – Enabling teachers, nurturing students. Ministry of Education Work Plan Seminar 2004 planning document. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2008). Speech by Dr Ng Eng Hen, Minister for Education and Second Minister for Defence, at the MOE Work Plan Seminar 2008, on Thursday, 25 September 2008 at 9.30am at the Ngee Ann Polytechnic Convention Centre. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2008/09/25/speech-by-dr-ng-eng-hen-at-the-moe-work-plan-seminar-2008.php
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2009). Report of the primary education review and implementation committee. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/initiatives/peri/files/peri-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2012). Education in Singapore: MOE corporate brochure. Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.sg/about/files/moe-corporate-brochure.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mok, M. M. C., Lung, C. L., Cheng, D. P. W., Cheung, R. H. P., & Ng, M. L. (2006). Self-assessment in higher education: Experience in using a metacognitive approach in five case studies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 415–433. doi:10.1080/02602930600679100
   Google Scholar
• Munns, G., & Woodward, H. (2006). Student engagement and student self-assessment: The REAL framework. Assessment in Education, 13(2), 193–213. doi:10.1080/09695940600703969
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2008). Testing the joy out of learning. Educational Leadership, 65(6), 14–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V., & Berliner, D. C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1). doi:10.14507/epaa.v14n1.2006
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 23–38. doi:10.1080/02602930050025006
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Rolheiser, C. (2002). Student self-evaluation in Grade 5-6 mathematics effects on problem-solving achievement. Educational Assessment, 8(1), 43–59. doi:10.1207/S15326977EA0801_03
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(10). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=10 http://pareonline.net/pdf/v11n10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004
   Google Scholar
• Soh, K. C. (1993). Measuring motivation to learn Chinese and English through self- reported feelings and behaviours. Singapore Journal of Education, 13(1), 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765. doi:10.1177/003172170208301010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing Times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y. K., Chow, H. H., & Goh, C. (2008). Examinations in Singapore: Change and continuity (1891–2007). Singapore; Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Tejeiro, R. A., Gómez-Vallecillo, J. L., Romero, A. F., Pelegrina, M., Wallace, A., & Emberley, E. (2012). Summative self-assessment in higher education: Implications of its counting towards the final mark. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(2), 789–812.
   Google Scholar
• Trunnel, P. (1992). Self-assessment. Adventures in assessment (Vol. 2). Boston: SABES, MA. Retrieved from http://www.sabes.org/resources/adventures/vol2/2trunnell.htm
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, C. R. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50. doi:10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2006). Formative assessment: Getting the focus right. Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4), 283–289. doi:10.1080/10627197.2006.9652993
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2008). Quality in assessment. In S. Swaffield (Ed.), Unlocking assessment: Understanding for reflection and application (pp. 123–137). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Johnson, P. (2000). Students thinking about their learning: Assessment to improve learning. Educational Research Quarterly, 24(2), 10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, H. M. (2012). The perceptions of Singaporean teachers and students toward academic self-assessments ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, H. M. (2016). I can assess myself: Singaporean primary students’ and teachers’ perceptions of students’ self-assessment ability. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 44(4), 442–457. doi:10.1080/03004279.2014.982672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, G. (2013). The case of St Margaret’s Girls’ College: How SLOA promotes self- assessment and peer assessment to enhance secondary school student English learning. In M. M. C. Mok (Ed.), Self-directed learning oriented assessments in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 393–411). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar