Exploring the multimodal argument: the interplay of multimodality and attention economy

References

• Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. Kensington Gardens: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, A. (2006). A multimodal approach to academic ‘literacies’: Problematising the visual/verbal divide. Language & Education, 20(6), 449–462. doi:10.2167/le677.0
   Google Scholar
• Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, J. A.(2012). Groundwork in the theory of argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J. E. (2006). Hearing ordinary voices: Cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 20(2), 201–214. doi:10.1080/10304310600641737
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. L. (2010). Teachers in the news: A critical analysis of one US newspaper’s discourse on education, 2006–2007. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2011). “Design” in principle and practice: A reconsideration of the terms of design engagement. The Design Journal, 14(1), 45–63. doi:10.2752/175630610X12877385838768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Costa, P. I. (2007). The chasm widens: The trouble with personal identity in Singapore writing. In M. Mantero (Ed.), Identity and second language learning: Culture, inquiry, and dialogic activity in educational contexts (pp. 217–234). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DeCapua, A., & Wintergerst, A. (2004). Crossing cultures in the language classroom. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubisar, A. M., & Palmeri, J. (2010). Palin/pathos/Peter Griffin: Political video remix and composition pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 27(2), 77–93. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Dusenberry, L., Hutter, L., & Robinson, J. (2015). Filter. Remix. Make. Cultivating adaptability through multimodality. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(3), 299–322. doi:10.1177/0047281615578851
   Google Scholar
• Fraiberg, S. (2010). Composition 2.0: Toward a multilingual and multimodal framework. College Composition and Communication, (1)100–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Généreux, A. P., & Thompson, W. A. (2008). Lights, camera, reflection! Digital movies: A tool for reflective learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(6), 21.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). Introducing functional grammar. New York: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hamston, J. (2006). Pathways to multiliteracies: Student teachers’ critical reflections on a multimodal text. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29(1), 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, D. (2010). Class, Capital and Education in this Neoliberal and Neoconservative Period”. In S. Macrine, P. McLaren, & D. Hill (Eds.), Revolutionizing pedagogy: Education for social justice within and beyond global neo-liberalism (pp. 119-144). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hocks, M. (2003). Understanding visual rhetoric in digital writing environments. College Composition and Communication, 54(4), 629–656. doi:10.2307/3594188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, G., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261. doi:10.1177/0741088304274170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamaludin, A.; Ho, M. L. C., & Chee, Y.S. (2007b). The impact of structured argumentation and enactive role play on students’ argumentative writing skills. In R.J Atkinson, C. McBeath, S.K.A Soong, & C. Cheers (Eds.) ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of Ascilite 2007 (pp.430-439). Singapore: Center for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jocson, K. M. (2013). Remix revisited: Critical solidarity in youth media arts. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(1), 68–82. doi:10.2304/elea.2013.10.1.68
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Youth, technology, and DIY developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89–119. doi:10.3102/0091732X10383211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajder, S. B. (2004). Enter here: Personal narrative and digital storytelling. The English Journal, 93, 64–68. doi:10.2307/4128811
   Google Scholar
• Koh, A. (2010). Tactical globalization: Learning from the Singapore experiment. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 249–252. doi:10.1111/modl.2006.90.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed., pp. 2006). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lanham, R. A. (2006). The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liew, W. M. (2012). Performing schools, performing teachers. In J. Tan (Ed.), Education in Singapore: Taking stock, looking forward (pp. 123–151). Singapore: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (1999). Being fluent with information technology, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2008). Framework for the new 2008 “A” Level curriculum. Retrieved 2008, August 20, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/corporate/preu_01.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. (2003). Educating the national citizen in neoliberal times: From the multicultural self to the strategic cosmopolitan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(4), 387–403. doi:10.1111/tran.2003.28.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & E, M. K. L. (2015). Multimodal analysis for critical thinking. Learning, Media and Technology, 1–24. doi:10.1080/17439884.2016.1101003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohler, J. (2006). The world of digital storytelling. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 44–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, A. M. C. (2010). Constructing the cosmopolitan subject: Teaching secondary school literature in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(1), 31–41. doi:10.1080/02188790903503577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 487–506. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2002). After effectiveness: New directions in the Singapore school system? Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 151–166. doi:10.1080/02680930110116507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D., & Cimasko, T. (2008). Multimodal composition in a college ESL class: New tools, traditional norms. Computers & Composition, 25, 376–395. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2008.07.001
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, Y. Y. J. (2008). Youth temporalities and the cost of Singapore’s educational success. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 29(2), 159–178.
   Google Scholar