Burrowing and becoming: teaching writing in uncertain times

References

• Alvermann, D. E. (2000). Researching libraries, literacies and lives: A rhizo-analysis. In E. A. St.Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the Ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battiste, M. (2013). Decolonizing education: Nourishing the learning spirit. Saskatoon: Purich Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. (2009). Teaching for joy and justice. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comber, B. (2015). Literacy, place, and pedagogies of possibility. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doll, Jr., William, E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, D. (2009). Forts, curriculum, and indigeneous metissage: Imagining decolonization of Aboriginal-Canadian relations in educational contexts. First Nations Perspectives, 2(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1993). Local knowledge: Further essays on interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (2003). Public pedagogy and the politics of resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 5–16. doi:10.1111/1469-5812.00002
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2007). Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 317–334. doi:10.1080/13603110701238769
   Google Scholar
• Grande, S. (2015). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought (10th Anniversary ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hasebe-Ludt, E., Chambers, C. M., & Leggo, C. (2009). Life writing and literary metissage as an ethos for our times. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, C. A. (2002). Academics and practitioners: Nurses as intellectuals. Nursing Inquiry, 9(2), 73–83. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1800.2002.00137.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honan, E. (2004). (Im)plausibilities: A rhizo-textual analysis of policy texts and teachers’ work. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 267–281. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00067.x
   Google Scholar
• Honeyford, M., Amy-Penner, J., Beyak, T., Beyer, D., Borton, B., Fewer, K., … Purdy, D. (2017). Artifacts as catalysts for reimagining transcultural literacy pedagogies. In R. Zaidi & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Literacy lives in transcultural times. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Honeyford, M., & Serebrin, W. (2015). Staging teachers’ stories: Performing understandings of writing and teaching writing. Language and Literacy, 17(3), 60–81. doi:10.20360/G28W2P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York: Routledge. [Kindle version].
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, C., & Gutshall, T. (2016). Go be a writer! Expanding the curricular boundaries of literacy learning with children. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning (3rd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavia, J. (2007). Repositioning pedagogies and postcolonialism: Theories, contradictions and possibilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 283–300. doi:10.1080/13603110701237548
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Enciso, P., & Moje, E. B. (2007). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Low, M, & Palulis, P. (2000). Teaching as a messy text: metonymic moments in pedagogical practice. Journal Of Curriculum Theorizing, 16(2), 67-80.
   Google Scholar
• Lundy, J. (2014). The stroll: Reflections on Deleuzian ethics. Rhizomes: Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge, 26. Retrieved from http://www.rhizomes.net/issue26/lundy.html
   Google Scholar
• McConaghy, C. (2004). On cartographies of anti-homophobia in teacher education (and the crisis of witnessing rural student teacher refusals). Teaching Education, 15(1), 63–79. doi:10.1080/1047621042000179998
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W. (1976). Adaptation: Change in classroom organization. Teachers College Record, 77(3), 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2006). Curriculum studies and transnational flows and mobilities: Feminist autobiographical perspectives. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 3(2), 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen Kwok, M., Ganding, E., III, Hull, G. A., & Moje, E. (2016). Sociocultural approaches to high school writing instruction: Examining the roles of context, positionality, and power. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 257–271). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2011). Artifactual critical literacy: A new perspective for literacy education. Berkeley Review of Education, 2(2), 129–151.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, D., & Alim, S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Education Review, 84(1), 85–100. doi:10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F., & Grumet, M. (1976). Toward a poor curriculum. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J. (2015). Project(ing) literacy: Writing to assemble in a postcomposition FYW classroom. College Composition and Communication, 67(1), 35–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J., & Zaidi, R. (2017). Literacy lives in transcultural times. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, M. (2010). Re(con)ceiving young children’s curricular performativity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 557–577. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.500629
   Google Scholar
• Short, D. (2013). “Don’t be so gay”: Queers, bullying, and making schools safe. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Watson, J. (2001). Reading autobiography: A guide for interpreting life narratives. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M., Davies, B., Power, K., Gannon, S., & de Carteret, P. (2011). Place pedagogy change. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2016, March 14). Aboriginal people: Fact sheet for Manitoba. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-656-x/89-656-x2016008-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, B. (2002). Technowledge: Literate practice and digital worlds. New York Studies in Media Studies, 7. Retrieved from http://www.egs.edu/mediaphi/pdfs/bonniestewart- techknowledge.pdf Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/5Xed19AOc
   Google Scholar
• Subedi, B., & Daza, S. L. (2008). The possibilities of postcolonial praxis in education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 11(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/13613320701845731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Final report of the truth and reconciliation commission of Canada, volume one: Summary. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Will, M. (2016, June 20). As teachers tackle new student-writing expectations, support is lacking. Education Week Teacher. Retrieved from: http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2016/06/20/as-teachers-tackle-new-student-writing-expectations-support.html
   Google Scholar