803
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teacher perceptions of the effectiveness of a science-infused literacy intervention for English language learners

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 18-39 | Received 06 Jul 2018, Accepted 22 Jan 2019, Published online: 02 Oct 2019

References

  • Agency, T. E. (2017). Texas public school districts categorized by types: 2015-2016. Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/acctres/analyze/1516/district1516.html#L
  • Allexsaht-Snider, M., Buxton, C. A., & Harman, R. (2012). Challenging anti-immigration discourses in school and community contexts. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(2), 1–9.
  • Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 213–239.
  • August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 345–376.
  • Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • British Council. (2017). The English effect. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/english-effect-report-v2.pdf
  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bybee, R. W. (1996). The contemporary reform of science education. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Issues in science education (pp. 1–14). Arlington, VA: National Science Education Leadership Association.
  • Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.
  • Connor, C., Kaya, S., Luck, M., Toste, J., Canto, A., Rice, D., … Underwood, P. (2010). Content area literacy: Individualizing student instruction in second-grade Science. The Reading Teacher, 63(6), 474–485.
  • Davidson, C., & Ollerhead, S. (2018). But I’m not an English teacher!: Disciplinary literacy in Australian science classrooms. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 19–43). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systematic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347.
  • Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 262–273.
  • Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., Fernández-Costales, A., & Arias Blanco, J. M. (2017). Analysing students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: Empirical evidence from Spain. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(6), 1–14.
  • Garza, T., Huerta, M., Lara-Alecio, R., Irby, B. J., & Tong, F. (2018). Pedagogical differences during a science and literacy integrated intervention for English language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 487–496.
  • Greenleaf, C., Litman, C., Hanson, T., Rosen, R., Herman, J., Schneider, S., & Jones, B. (2011). Integrating literacy and science in biology: teaching and learning impacts of reading apprenticeship professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 647–717. doi: 10.3102/0002831210384839
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literary and discursive power. London, England: Falmer Press.
  • Ho, C., Rappe, N. A., & Tang, K. (2018). Meeting disciplinary literacy demands in content learning: The Singapore perspective. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 46–50). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
  • Huerta, M., Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., & Irby, B. J. (2014). Developing and validating a science notebook rubric for fifth grade non-mainstream students. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1849–1870.
  • Huerta, M., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., & Lara-Alecio, R. (2016). Measuring and comparing academic language development and conceptual understanding via science notebooks. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 503–517.
  • International Literacy Association. (2015). The multiple roles of school-based specialized literacy professionals [research brief]. Newark, DE: Author.
  • Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Sutton-Jones, K. L., & Abdelrahman, N. (2018). Implementation of research-based ESL strategies with lower grade middle school ELLs in the science classroom: Findings from an experimental study. TESL-EJ, 22(1), 1–25.
  • Irby, B. J., Tong, F., Lara-Alecio, R., Mathes, G. P., Acosta, S., & Guerrero, C. (2010). Quality of instruction, language of instruction, and Spanish-speaking English learners’ performance on a state high-stakes reading assessment. TABE Journal, 12(1), 1–42.
  • Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118, 282–292.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance Improvement, 26(8), 1–7.
  • Knian, E., & Ødegaard, M. (2018). The implementation of scientific literacy as basic in Norway after school reform of 2006. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 15–28). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Retrieved from www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
  • Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lara-Alecio, R., Irby, B. J., & Tong, F. (2013). English Language and Literacy Acquisition-Validation (ELLA-V). Office of Innovation and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education (PR/Award Number U411B120047.
  • Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y. (2012). An experimental study of science intervention among middle school English learners: Findings from first year implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 987–1011.
  • Lara-Alecio, R., Irby, B. J., Tong, F., Guerrero, C., & Koch, J. (2018). Assessing conceptual understanding via a literacy-infused, inquiry-based science among middle school english learners and economically-challenged students. Education Sciences, 8(27), 1–20. doi: 10.3390/educsci8010027
  • Lee, O. (2005). Science education with english language learners: synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75, 491–530.
  • Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. G. (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 31–52.
  • Liu, O., Lee, H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Measuring knowledge integration: Validation of four-year assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1079–1107.
  • Llosa, L., Lee, O., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., Van Booven, C. D., & Kieffer, M. J. (2016). Impact of a large-scale science intervention focused on English language learners. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 395–424.
  • Lo, Y. Y., Lin, A. M., . Y., & Cheung, C. L. (2018). Supporting English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ science literacy development in CLIL: A genre-based approach. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 79–95). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Markic, S. (2018). Learning language and instructional understanding in science classes in Germany. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 63–77). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The condition of education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfor.asp?pubid=2-16144.
  • Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463.
  • Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. (2007). What makes professional development effective: Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.
  • Raskauskas, J., Rubiano, S., Offen, I., & Wayland, A. K. (2015). Do social self-efficacy and self-esteem moderate the relationship between peer victimization and academic performance?. Social Psychology of Education, 18(2), 297–314.
  • Setati, M., Adler, J., Reed, Y., & Bapoo, A. (2002). Incomplete journeys: Code-switching and other language practices in mathematics, science and English language classrooms in South Africa. Language and Education, 16(2), 128–149.
  • Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40–59.
  • Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18.
  • Stephens, K. E. (2010). Improving reading achievement of low SES minority students with science related informational texts and structured responses. Mentoring Literacy Professionals, 1, 317–333.
  • Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664–687.
  • Tan, M., & Lan, O. S. (2011). Teaching mathematics and science in English in Malaysian classrooms: The impact of teacher beliefs on classroom practices and student learning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(1), 5–18.
  • Thadani, V., Cook, M. S., Griffis, K., Wise, J., & Blakey, M. (2010). The possibilities and limitations of curriculum-based science inquiry interventions for challenging the ‘pedagogy of poverty. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 21–37.
  • Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., Guerrero, C., Fan, Y., & Huerta, M. (2014). A randomized study of literacy integrated science intervention for low SES middle school students: Findings from first year implementation. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2083–2109.
  • Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., Guerrero, C., & Tang, S. (2018). The impact of professional learning on in-service teachers’ pedagogical delivery of literacy-infused science with middle school English learners: A randomised controlled trial study in the U.S. Educational Studies. doi:10.1080/03055698.2018.1509776
  • Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., & Koch, J. (2014). A longitudinal study of integrating literacy and science for fifth grade Hispanic current and former English language learners: From learning to read to reading to learn. Journal of Educational Research, 107, 410–426.
  • Tong, F., Lara-Alecio, R., & Irby, B. J. (2015). Teachers perception of virtual professional development in a randomized control trial. International Journals of New Technology and Research, 1(7), 58–61.
  • Tong, F., Luo, W., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., & Rivera, H. (2017). Investigating the impact of professional development on teachers’ instructional time allocation and English learners’ cognitive and academic language development: A multilevel cross-classified approach. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(3), 292–313.
  • Tong, F., & Tang, S. (2017). English-medium instruction in Chinese university science classroom: An observation study. In English-medium instruction in Chinese universities. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wright, T. S., & Gotwals, A. W. (2017). Supporting kindergartners’ science talk in the context of an integrated science and disciplinary literacy curriculum. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 513–537.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.