Instructional practices for scaffolding emergent bilinguals’ comprehension of informational science texts

References

• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2010). Discourse analysis & the study of classroom language & literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Kappes, L. (2012). Implementing the common core state standards: A primer on “Close reading of text”. Aspen Institute. http://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/implementing-common-core-state-standards-primer-close-reading-text.
   Google Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. (1994). Classroom problems, school culture, and cognitive research. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 273–290). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, G., Walqui, A., & Pearson, P. D. (2014). Complex text and new common standards in the United States: Pedagogical implications for English learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 533–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, M. R., Harper, C. A., & de Jong, E. J. (2016). Aiming for equity: Preparing mainstream teachers for inclusion or inclusive classrooms? TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 340–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L. (2008). A linguistic approach in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: A focus on teacher education. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4(2), 101–133. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v4i2.101
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L. C., & Athanases, S. Z. (2017). A framework to reenvision instructional scaffolding for linguistically diverse learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L. C., Klassen, M., & Maune, M. (2014). Introduction. In L. C. de Oliveira (Ed.), The common core state standards in English language arts for English language learners, grades 6–12 (pp. 1–4). TESOL International Association.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. (2004). The case for informational text. Educational Leadership, 61 (6), 40–45. https://search-ebscohostcom.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ofs&AN=507893230&scope=site
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echevarría, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. J. (2013). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2017). Teaching, learning, literacy in our high-risk high-tech world: A framework for becoming human. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geva, E. (2006). Second-language oral proficiency and second-language literacy. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth (pp. 123–139). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, C. (2011). Reading instruction for English language learners. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 684–710). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1980/2004). Three aspects of children’s language development: Learning language, learning through language, learning about language. In J. Webster (Ed.), The language of early childhood (Vol. 4, pp. 308–326). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Z., & D’Angelo, A. (2009). Balancing between comprehension and acquisition: Proposing a dual approach. In Z. Han & N. J. Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading research and instruction: Crossing the boundaries (pp. 173–191). University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2018). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kibler, A. K., Walqui, A., & Bunch, G. (2015). Transformational opportunities: Language and literacy instruction for English language learners in the Common Core Era in the United States. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3(2), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0302_1
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1991). The input hypothesis: An update. In J. E. Atlatis (Ed.), Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art (pp. 409–431). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 337–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucan, L., & Palincsar, A. S. (2013). Comprehension instruction through text-based discussion. International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kucan, L., & Palincsar, A. S. (2018). Text analysis: Critical component of planning for text-based discussion focused on comprehension of informational texts. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(2), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1400612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). On the roles of repetition in language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0009
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2014). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. C. (1984). Case Studies. In R. F. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 237–241). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common core state standards English language arts. K-5.
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(March), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2016). Content-based language teaching with functional grammar in the elementary school. Language Teaching, 49(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org.proxy1.cl.msu.edu.proxy2.cl.msu.edu.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J., & Symons, C. (forthcoming). The role of meaningful sentence-level metalanguage: Insights from children’s thinking with functional grammar. In M. E. Brisk & M. J. Schleppegrell (Eds.), Language in action: SFL theory across contexts. Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2012). Expanding the four resources model: Reading visual and multi-modal texts. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2012.656347
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., & O’Connor, C. (2017). Close-reading and far-reaching classroom discussion: Fostering a vital connection. Journal of Education, 196(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600102
   Google Scholar
• Symons, C. (2015). Investigating functional grammar analysis as an instructional tool for meaning-making with fourth-grade English learners. University of Michigan: Proquest, UMI Dissertation Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Symons, C. (2017). Supporting emergent bilinguals’ argumentation: Evaluating evidence in informational science texts. Linguistics and Education, 38, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, C., Palincsar, A. S., & Schleppegrell, M. (2017). Fourth-grade emergent bilinguals’ uses of functional grammar analysis to talk about text. Learning and Instruction, 52, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. Van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 1–31). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walqui, A., & Van Lier, L. (2010). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: A pedagogy of promise. WestEd.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Son, E. S. (2011). A dialogic turn in research on learning and teaching to comprehend. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 359–387). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.1976.17.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar