Practical and theoretical considerations as a researcher-teacher: reflections on a bidialectal programme involving Singlish in a secondary school

References

• Agha, A. (2004). Registers of language. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 23–45). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Alim, H. S. (2005). Critical language awareness in the United States: Revisiting issues and revising pedagogies in a resegregated society. Educational Researcher, 34(7), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034007024
   Google Scholar
• Alsagoff, L. (2001). Tense and aspect in Singapore English. In V. Ooi (Ed.), Evolving identities: The English language in Singapore and Malaysia (pp. 79–88). Times Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alsagoff, L. (2016). Interpreting error patterns in a longitudinal primary school corpus of writing. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 114–124.
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D. L., & Consoli, S. (2020). Action research in language education. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 176–187). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baynham, M. (2011). Narrative analysis. In B. Paltridge & K. Hyland (Eds.), The bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis (pp. 69–84). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, U. (2020). Rethinking researcher-teacher roles and relationships in educational action research through the use of Nel Noddings’ ethics of care. Educational Action Research, 28(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1567367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J., & Dong, J. (2010). Ethnographic fieldwork: A beginner’s guide. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805002661
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, F., Ng, B. C., & Seilhamer, M. (2014). Singapore colloquial English: Issues of prestige and identity. World Englishes, 33(3), 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L. L. (2016). The reality behind Singlish. New York Times. 23 May.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Q. Z. (2016). WH-Question constructions in colloquial Singapore English. PhD Dissertation. National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, B. H. (2017). Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Costa, P. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2010). Classroom ethnography. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 320–325). Aca- demic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., Bell, J., & Berger, M. (2003). Gaining access: A practical and theoretical guide for qualitative researchers. AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, V., Lim, L., & Wee, L. (2002). ‘Singlish’: Used and abused. Asian Englishes, 5(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2002.10801087
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. F. (1992). The pragmatic particles of Singapore colloquial English. Journal of Pragmatics, 17(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90106-L
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. F. (2006). Epistemic modalities and the discourse particles of Singapore. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 243–263). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B., & Street, B. (2008). Ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, M. L. (1999). Forms and functions of reduplication in colloquial Singaporean English. Asian Englishes, 1(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.1999.10801005
   Google Scholar
• Ho, M. L., & Platt, J. (1993). Dynamics of a contact continuum: Singapore English. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. H., Ling, A. P., & Nomoto, H. (2009). Colloquial Singapore English got: Functions and substratal influences. World Englishes, 28(3), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01594.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leimgruber, J., Lim, J. J., Wilkinson, D. W. G., & Hiramoto, M. (2021). Ethnic and gender variation in the use of colloquial Singapore English discourse particles. English Language & Linguistics, 25(3), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674320000453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2004). Singapore English: A grammatical approach. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, L. (in press). ‘I don’t speak Singlish’ – linguistic chutzpah and denial in the ELT classroom. International Journal for Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(1), 9–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/225294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, T., & Fisher, J. (2015). Strategies for obtaining access to secretive or guarded organisations. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 44(6), 709–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241614549834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, C., & Riaz, N. (2016). Accessing the field: Methodological difficulties of research in schools. Education in the North, 23(2), 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Pakir, A. (1991). The range and depth of English-knowing Bilinguals in Singapore. World Englishes, 10(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1991.tb00149.x
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J., Weber, H., & Ho, M. L. (1983). Varieties of English around the world: Singapore and Malaysia. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rubdy, R. (2007). Singlish in the school: An impediment or a resource? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(4), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd459.0
   Google Scholar
• Scheman, N. (2001). Epistemology resuscitated: Objectivity as trustworthiness. In N. Tuana & S. Morgen (Eds.), Engendering rationalities (pp. 207–231). SUNY Press .
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K., & Hayter, S. (2004). Strategies for gaining access to organisations and informants in qualitative studies. Education for Information, 22(3–4), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-223-404
   Google Scholar
• Smakman, D., & Wagenaar, S. (2013). Discourse particles in colloquial Singapore English. World Englishes, 32(3), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C., & Perez-Milans, M. (2018). Language, neoliberalism, and the commodification of pedagogy. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(5), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1501844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, P. K., & Tan, D. K. (2008). Attitudes towards non-standard English in Singapore. World Englishes, 27(3–4), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.00578.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorising qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, T. (1988). Knowledge in social anthropology: Distancing and universality. Anthropology Today, 4(2), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033229
   Google Scholar
• Tupas, R. (2018). Singlish in the classroom: Is Singapore ready for additive bidi- alectalism? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(8), 982–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1226757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupas, R. (2021). Fostering translingual dispositions against unequal Englishes. English in Education, 55(3), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2020.1786367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallance, R. (2001). Gaining access: Introducing referred approval. Issues in Educational Research, 11(2), 65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J., & Kolb, D. (1985). The professional apprentice: Observations on fieldwork roles in two organizational settings. In S. Bacharach, & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 4, pp. 1–33). JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (1997). Classroom ethnography. In N. H. Hornberger & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. (Vol. 8, pp. 135–144). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wee, L. (2008). Singapore English: Morphology and syntax. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Varieties of English 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia (pp. 593–609). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Wee, L. (2011). Metadiscursive convergence in the Singlish debate. Language & Communication, 31(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee, L. (2018). The Singlish controversy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widding, G. (2012). Keep a-knocking (but you can’t come in): The issue of passing by the gatekeeper and gaining linguistic access to qualitative research fields. Education Inquiry, 3(3), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v3i3.22044
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (1977). The use of ethnographic techniques in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, D. (1995). Challenges confronting the researcher/teacher: Conflicts of purpose and conduct. Educational Researcher, 24(3), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X024003022
   Google Scholar