Scaffolding principles of content-based science instruction in an international elementary school

References

• Abadikhah, S., & Valipour, M. (2014). Internalizing features through expert scaffolding: a case of Iranian learners. The English Teacher, XLIII(3), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349465
   Google Scholar
• Awan, A. M., & Sipra, A. M. (2018). CLIL: content-based instructional approach to second language pedagogy. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azir, I. D. A., & Sriyanto, W. (2021). Improving English reading digital text skills for multimedia students through the scaffolding method. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 8(2), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.298.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. A., & Williams, S. (2010). Social and analytic scaffolding in middle school mathematics: Managing the dilemma of telling. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9121-4
   Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 505–518). Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. (2015). Relations between teacher questioning and student talk in one elementary ELL classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(3), 370–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296x16632451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. (2003). Content-Based second language instruction. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8754
   Google Scholar
• Cammarata, L., & Ceallaigh, T. (2018). Teacher education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.00004.cam
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammarata, L., Tedick, D. J., & Osborn, T. A. (2016). Content-based instruction and curricular reforms: issues and goals. In L. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp. 1–23). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carloni, G. (2018). English-taught programs and scaffolding in CLIL setting. La didattica delle lingue nel nuovo millennio, 4, 483–498. https://doi.org/10.14277/6969-227-7/SR-13–29
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J., & Early, M. (2015). Big ideas for expanding minds: Teaching English language learners across the curriculum. Rubicon.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2016). Vygotsky and dialogic pedagogy. In D. Skidmore & K. Murakami (Eds.), Dialogic pedagogy: The importance of dialogue in teaching and learning (pp. 48–64). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Doo, M., Bonk, C., & Heo, H. (2020). A meta-analysis of scaffolding effects in online learning in higher education. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 21(3), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Fontecha, A., O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Wignell, P. (2019). A multimodal approach to visual thinking: The scientific sketchnote. Visual Communication, 18(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218759808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Fontechaa, A., O’Halloran, K. L., Wignell, P., & Tan, S. (2020). Scaffolding CLIL in the science classroom via visual thinking: A systemic functional multimodal approach. Linguistics and Education, 55, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2013). Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamidi, E., & Bagherzadeh, R. (2018). The logical problem of scaffolding in second language acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0059-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammou, S., & Kesbai, A. (2021). Physics teachers’ attitudes towards content and language integrated learning: Morocco’s multilingual context. Issues in Educational Research, 31(4), 1028–1048. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i1.2643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, P., & Lin, A. M. (2019). Co-developing science literacy and foreign language literacy through “Concept+ Language Mapping”. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18033.he
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herazo, J. D. (2021). Mediating spoken meaning-making in genre-based lessons: The role of metalinguistic concepts. System, 96, 102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, T., Haigh, A., Roberts, D., & Shaw, G. (2014). Oxford international primary science. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, M. A., & Baloyi, O. B. (2020). Scaffolding in reflective journaling: A means to develop higher order thinking skills in undergraduate learners. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 12, 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100195
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, C. J. (2011). Transcribing talk and interaction: Issues in the representation of communication data.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, A. (2015). Inducing participation in a CBI classroom. English Teaching, 70(4), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.70.4.201512.27
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lascotte, D. K. (2018). Strategies, scaffolding, and social positioning in interaction. TESOL Journal, 9(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2020). Exploring teacher scaffolding in a CLIL-framed EFL intensive reading class: A classroom discourse analysis approach. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820903340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T., Hsu, Y., Lin, S.-S., Changlai, M., Yang, K., & Lai, T. (2012). A review of empirical evidence on scaffolding for science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9322-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., Morton, T., Llinares, A., & Morton, T. 2017. Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2019). Teaching, learning and scaffolding in CLIL science classrooms. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.00006.lo
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Lui, W., & Wong, M. (2019). Scaffolding for cognitive and linguisticchallenges in CLIL science assessments. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18028.lo
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahan, K. R. (2020). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahan, K. R., Brevik, L. M., & Ødegaard, M. (2018). Characterizing CLIL teaching: New insights from a lower secondary classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(3), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1472206
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. R., Klassen, K., & Hardy, J. W. (2020). Curriculum design from theory to practice: Preparing Japanese students to study abroad using content-based language teaching. The Curriculum Journal, 32(2), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2020). Afterword: SFL, theoretical pluralism and content and language integration at the levels of curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(3), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1806781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U., Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., Smit, U. (2016). Conceptualizing integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096145
   Google Scholar
• Omoniyi, A. O., & Torru, T. S. (2018). Effects of scaffolding teaching strategy on student’ performance in chemistry in secondary schools in Ondo State, Nigeria. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(9), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.59.4830
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A. K., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2014). One lesson is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons. Learning and Instruction, 31(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Riazi, A. M. (2016). The Routledge encyclopedia of research methods in applied linguistics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roblin, N. P., Schunn, C., & McKenney, S. (2018). What are critical features of science curriculum materials that impact student and teacher outcomes? Science Education, 102(2), 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll, I., Holmes, N. G., Day, J., & Bonn, D. (2012). Evaluating metacognitive scaffolding in guided invention activities. Instructional Science, 40(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9208-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Zenotz, V. (2017). Learning strategies in CLIL classrooms: How does strategy instruction affect reading competence over time? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1391745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, S., Hasegawa, A., Kumagai, Y., & Kamiyoshi, U. (2017). Content-based instruction (CBI) for the social future: A recommendation for critical content-based language instruction (CCBI). L2 Journal, 9(3), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.5070/l29334164
   Google Scholar
• Scheb-Buenner, P. (2013). Do scaffolding interactions exist in the Thai classroom? GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 13(3), 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820600996972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S., Brush, T., & Glazewski, K. (2017). Designing and implementing web-based scaffolding tools for technology enhanced socio-scientific inquiry. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2018). Deconflating the ZPD and instructional scaffolding: Retranslating and reconceiving the zone of proximal development as the zone of next development. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 16, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, D., & Kim, D. (2020). Effects of self-regulation scaffolding on online participation and learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1767525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller, F., & Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2017). Content-based instruction. In N. Van DeusenScholl & S. May (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Second and foreign language education (pp. 71–84). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction, language and body in the material world. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y. (2017). Liberal English education. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 49(6), 859–870.
   Google Scholar
• Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M., & Kamrani, Z. (2020). Functions and strategies of teachers’ discursive scaffolding in English-medium content-based instruction. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2020.120931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajeddin, Z., & Kamali, J. (2020). Typology of scaffolding in teacher discourse: large data-based evidence from second language classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyan, F. J. (2021). “Alors, on va faire une activité”: An SFL perspective on student engagement in contextualized world language instruction. System, 98, 102483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyan, F. J., Cammarata, L., & Martel, J. (2017). Integration PCK: Modeling the knowledge(s) underlying a world language teacher’s implementation of CBI. Foreign Language Annals, 50(2), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J. (2012). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: Exploring, measuring, promoting and evaluating scaffolding. Research Institute Child Development and Education (CDE).
   Google Scholar
• van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding student understanding in small-group work: Students’ uptake of teacher support in subsequent small-group interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1522258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Kampen, E., Admiraal, W., & Berry, A. (2018). Content and language integrated learning in the Netherlands: Teachers’ self-reported pedagogical practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1154004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Recent advances (pp. 245–259). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (2002a). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and linguistics. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 140–164). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (2002b). Ecology, contingency and talk in the postmethod classroom. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 8, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L., van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 53–66). Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (2010). The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory topractice. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 3, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). Though and language. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2021). Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 51(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D., & Harfitt, G. (2019). Teacher language awareness and scaffoldedinteraction in CLIL science classrooms. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18023.xu
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar