TEX264 at the intersection of autophagy and DNA repair

References

• Khaminets A, Behl C, Dikic I. Ubiquitin-dependent and independent signals in selective autophagy. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:6–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargemont C, Ossareh-Nazari B. Cdc48/p97, a key actor in the interplay between autophagy and ubiquitin/proteasome catabolic pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2012;1823:138–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikic I. Open questions: why should we care about reticulophagy and ER remodelling? BMC Biol. 2018;16:131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chino H, Hatta T, Natsume T, et al. Intrinsically disordered protein TEX264 mediates reticulophagy. Mol Cell. 2019;74(909–921):e6.
   Google Scholar
• An H, Ordureau A, Paulo JA, et al. TEX264 is an endoplasmic reticulum-resident ATG8-interacting protein critical for ER remodeling during nutrient stress. Mol Cell. 2019;74(891–908):e10. .
   Google Scholar
• Fielden J, Wiseman K, Torrecilla I, et al. TEX264 coordinates p97- and SPRTN-mediated resolution of topoisomerase 1-DNA adducts. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaminets A, Heinrich T, Mari M, et al. Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum turnover by selective autophagy. Nature. 2015;522:354–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephani M, Picchianti L, Gajic A, et al. A cross-kingdom conserved reticulophagy receptor maintains endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis during stress. eLife. 2020;9:e58396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Harley ME, Kemp AJ, et al. CCPG1 is a non-canonical autophagy cargo receptor essential for reticulophagy and pancreatic ER proteostasis. Dev Cell. 2018;44(217–232):e11. .
   Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Xiao Y, Chai P, et al. ATL3 is a tubular Reticulophagy receptor for GABARAP-mediated selective autophagy. Curr Biol. 2019;29:846–855.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang JR, Lingeman E, Ahmed S, et al. Atlastins remodel the endoplasmic reticulum for selective autophagy. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:3354–3367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme-Axford E, Popelka H, Klionsky DJ. TEX264 is a major receptor for mammalian reticulophagy. Autophagy. 2019;15:1677–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumagalli F, Noack J, Bergmann T, et al. Translocon component Sec62 acts in endoplasmic reticulum turnover during stress recovery. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18:1173–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang JR, Lingeman E, Luong T, et al. A genome-wide reticulophagy screen highlights key roles of mitochondrial metabolism and ER-resident UFMylation. Cell. 2020;180:1160–1177.e20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S. Picky eating at the reticulophagy buffet. Trends Biochem Sci. 2019;44:731–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar NO, Rapoport TA. Molecular mechanism of substrate processing by the Cdc48 ATPase complex. Cell. 2017;169:722–735.e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie M, Aslanian A, Prudden J, et al. Dual recruitment of Cdc48 (p97)-Ufd1-Npl4 ubiquitin-selective segregase by small ubiquitin-like modifier protein (SUMO) and ubiquitin in SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase-mediated genome stability functions. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:29610–29619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker C, Herranz-Martin S, Karyka E, et al. C9orf72 expansion disrupts ATM-mediated chromosomal break repair. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1225–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alagoz M, Chiang SC, Sharma A, et al. ATM deficiency results in accumulation of DNA-topoisomerase I covalent intermediates in neural cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e58239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Khamisy SF, Saifi GM, Weinfeld M, et al. Defective DNA single-strand break repair in spinocerebellar ataxia with axonal neuropathy-1. Nature. 2005;434:108–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katyal S, Lee Y, Nitiss KC, et al. Aberrant topoisomerase-1 DNA lesions are pathogenic in neurodegenerative genome instability syndromes. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:813–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Desai SD, Liu LF. SUMO-1 conjugation to human DNA topoisomerase II isozymes. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:26066–26073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stingele J, Schwarz MS, Bloemeke N, et al. A DNA-dependent protease involved in DNA-protein crosslink repair. Cell. 2014;158:327–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakirev MY, Mullally JE, Favier A, et al. Wss1 metalloprotease partners with Cdc48/Doa1 in processing genotoxic SUMO conjugates. eLife. 2015;4:e06763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskey RS, Flatten KS, Sieben CJ, et al. Spartan deficiency causes accumulation of Topoisomerase 1 cleavage complexes and tumorigenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:4564–4576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz B, Popovic M, Newman JA, et al. Metalloprotease SPRTN/DVC1 orchestrates replication-coupled DNA-protein crosslink REPAIR. Mol Cell. 2016;64:704–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielden J, Ruggiano A, Popović M, et al. DNA protein crosslink proteolysis repair: from yeast to premature ageing and cancer in humans. DNA Repair (Amst). 2018;71:198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interthal H, Champoux JJ. Effects of DNA and protein size on substrate cleavage by human tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1. Biochem J. 2011;436:559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosbech A, Gibbs-Seymour I, Kagias K, et al. DVC1 (C1orf124) is a DNA damage-targeting p97 cofactor that promotes ubiquitin-dependent responses to replication blocks. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:1084–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen NB, Gao AO, Sparks JL, et al. Replication-coupled DNA-protein crosslink repair by SPRTN and the proteasome in xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell. 2019;73(574–588):e7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halder S, Torrecilla I, Burkhalter MD, et al. SPRTN protease and checkpoint kinase 1 cross-activation loop safeguards DNA replication. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mórocz M, Zsigmond E, Tóth R, et al. DNA-dependent protease activity of human Spartan facilitates replication of DNA-protein crosslink-containing DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:3172–3188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stingele J, Bellelli R, Alte F, et al. Mechanism and regulation of DNA-protein crosslink repair by the DNA-dependent metalloprotease SPRTN. Mol Cell. 2016;64:688–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Raczynska JE, Chen Z, et al. Structural insight into DNA-dependent activation of human metalloprotease spartan. Cell Rep. 2019;26(3336–3346):e4.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo SG, Hartono SR, Sanz LA, et al. DNA Topoisomerase I differentially modulates R-loops across the human genome. Genome Biol. 2018;19:100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murai J, Tang S-W, Leo E, et al. SLFN11 blocks stressed replication forks independently of ATR. Mol Cell. 2018;69:371–384.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Jiang X, Zhang Y, et al. Nuclear accumulation of UBC9 contributes to SUMOylation of lamin A/C and nucleophagy in response to DNA damage. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horigome C, Bustard DE, Marcomini I, et al. PolySUMOylation by Siz2 and Mms21 triggers relocation of DNA breaks to nuclear pores through the Slx5/Slx8 STUbL. Genes Dev. 2016;30:931–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen JM, Dhingra N, Wei L, et al. Relocation of collapsed forks to the nuclear pore complex depends on sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and permits Rad51 association. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu T, Bonner MR, Chiolo I. Cervantes and Quijote protect heterochromatin from aberrant recombination and lead the way to the nuclear periphery. Nucleus. 2016;7:485–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Bai X, Li J, et al. The nucleoskeleton protein IFFO1 immobilizes broken DNA and suppresses chromosome translocation during tumorigenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:1273–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb AM, Murray TV, Warren DT, et al. Disruption of PCNA-lamins A/C interactions by prelamin A induces DNA replication fork stalling. Nucleus. 2016;7:498–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horigome C, Gasser SM. SUMO wrestles breaks to the nuclear ring’s edge. Cell Cycle. 2016;15:3011–3013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos Y, Hodgson L, Mantell J, et al. ESCRT-III controls nuclear envelope reformation. Nature. 2015;522:236–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enenkel C, Lehmann A, Kloetzel PM. GFP-labelling of 26S proteasomes in living yeast: insight into proteasomal functions at the nuclear envelope/rough ER. Mol Biol Rep. 1999;26:131–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Miller Jenkins LM, Su YP et al. A conserved SUMO-Ubiquitin pathway directed by RNF4/SLX5-SLX8 and PIAS4/SIZ1 drives proteasomal degradation of topoisomerase DNA-protein crosslinks. BioRxiv. 2019;707661. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1101/707661.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs-Seymour I, Oka Y, Rajendra E, et al. Ubiquitin-SUMO circuitry controls activated fanconi anemia ID complex dosage in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell. 2015;57:150–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert T, Vanoli F, Chiolo I, et al. HDACs link the DNA damage response, processing of double-strand breaks and autophagy. Nature. 2011;471:74–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang N, Zhang L, et al. Autophagy regulates chromatin ubiquitination in DNA damage response through elimination of SQSTM1/p62. Mol Cell. 2016;63:34–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt G, Carroll B, Sarallah R, et al. SQSTM1/p62 mediates crosstalk between autophagy and the UPS in DNA repair. Autophagy. 2016;12:1917–1930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Wang L, Fozouni P, et al. SIRT1 is downregulated by autophagy in senescence and ageing. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22:1170–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou Z, Xu C, Donahue G, et al. Autophagy mediates degradation of nuclear lamina. Nature. 2015;527:105–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochida K, Oikawa Y, Kimura Y, et al. Receptor-mediated selective autophagy degrades the endoplasmic reticulum and the nucleus. Nature. 2015;522:359–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee IH, Kawai Y, Fergusson MM, et al. Atg7 modulates p53 activity to regulate cell cycle and survival during metabolic stress. Science. 2012;336:225–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, He X, Luo Y, et al. A novel ARF-binding protein (LZAP) alters ARF regulation of HDM2. Biochem J. 2006;393:489–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov A, Pawlikowski J, Manoharan I, et al. Lysosome-mediated processing of chromatin in senescence. J Cell Biol. 2013;202:129–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rello-Varona S, Lissa D, Shen S, et al. Autophagic removal of micronuclei. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:170–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassour J, Radford R, Correia A, et al. Autophagic cell death restricts chromosomal instability during replicative crisis. Nature. 2019;565:659–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Liu P, Fukumoto T, et al. Topoisomerase 1 cleavage complex enables pattern recognition and inflammation during senescence. Nat Commun. 2020;11:908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju JS, Fuentealba RA, Miller SE, et al. Valosin-containing protein (VCP) is required for autophagy and is disrupted in VCP disease. J Cell Biol. 2009;187:875–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLelland GL, Goiran T, Yi W, et al. Mfn2 ubiquitination by PINK1/parkin gates the p97-dependent release of ER from mitochondria to drive mitophagy. eLife. 2018;7:e32866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka A, Cleland MM, Xu S, et al. Proteasome and p97 mediate mitophagy and degradation of mitofusins induced by Parkin. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:1367–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos C, Kirchner P, Bug M, et al. VCP/p97 cooperates with YOD1, UBXD1 and PLAA to drive clearance of ruptured lysosomes by autophagy. Embo J. 2017;36:135–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheleznova Heldwein EE, Brennan RG. Crystal structure of the transcription activator BmrR bound to DNA and a drug. Nature. 2001;409:378–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakanishi A, Oshida T, Matsushita T, et al. Identification of DNA gyrase inhibitor (GyrI) in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:1933–1938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanowski MJ, Gibney SA, Burley SK. Crystal structure of the Escherichia coli SbmC protein that protects cells from the DNA replication inhibitor microcin B17. Proteins. 2002;47:403–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakanishi A, Imajoh-Ohmi S, Hanaoka F. Characterization of the interaction between DNA gyrase inhibitor and DNA gyrase of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:8949–8954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon HJ, Bennik MHJ, Demple B, et al. Crystal structure of the Escherichia coli Rob transcription factor in complex with DNA. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7:424–430.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baquero MR, Bouzon M, Varea J, et al. sbmC, a stationary‐phase induced SOS Escherichia coli gene, whose product protects cells from the DNA replication inhibitor microcin B17. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18:301–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterji M, Nagaraja V. GyrI: a counter-defensive strategy against proteinaceous inhibitors of DNA gyrase. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:261–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterji M, Sengupta S, Nagaraja V. Chromosomally encoded gyrase inhibitor GyrI protects Escherichia coli against DNA-damaging agents. Arch Microbiol. 2003;180:339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Zhang J, Cai Y, et al. GyrI-like proteins catalyze cyclopropanoid hydrolysis to confer cellular protection. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma KI, et al. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–3066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn O, Privman E, Ashkenazy H, et al. GUIDANCE: a web server for assessing alignment confidence scores. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W23–W28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anisimova M, Gascuel O. Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: a fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. Syst Biol. 2006;55:539–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anantharaman V, Aravind L. The SHS2 module is a common structural theme in functionally diverse protein groups, like Rpb7p, FtsA, GyrI, and MTH1598/Tm1083 superfamilies. Proteins. 2004;56:795–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citarelli M, Teotia S, Lamb RS. Evolutionary history of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene family in eukaryotes. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogerson C, Bergamaschi D, O’Shaughnessy RFL. Uncovering mechanisms of nuclear degradation in keratinocytes: a paradigm for nuclear degradation in other tissues. Nucleus. 2018;9:56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar