832
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Formative Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Intervention to Reduce Long-Term Foster Care: Assessing Readiness for Summative Evaluation

, , , , &
Pages 354-374 | Received 01 Dec 2013, Accepted 14 Jun 2014, Published online: 10 Sep 2014

REFERENCES

  • Administration on Children Youth and Families (ACYF). (2012). Promoting social and emotional well-being for children and youth receiving child welfare services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/resource/im1204
  • Akin, B. A., Bryson, S., Testa, M. F., Blase, K. A., McDonald, T., & Melz, H. (2013). Usability testing, initial implementation and formative evaluation of an evidence-based intervention: Lessons from a demonstration project to reduce long-term foster care. Evaluation and Program Planning, 41, 19–30.
  • Akin, B. A., Bryson, S. A., McDonald, T., & Walker, S. (2012). Defining a target population at high-risk of long-term foster dare: Barriers to permanency for families of children with serious emotional disturbances. Child Welfare, 91(6), 79–101.
  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning: Theory, method, and practice: Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 543–554.
  • Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12(1), 23–33.
  • Bryson, S., Akin, B. A., Blase, K. A., McDonald, T., & Walker, S. (2014). Selecting an EBP to reduce long-term foster care: Lessons from a university-child welfare agency partnership. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11(1–2), 208–221.
  • Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18(1), 23–45.
  • Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350.
  • Epstein, D., & Klerman, J. A. (2012). When is a program ready for rigorous impact evaluation? The role of a falsifiable logic model. Evaluation Review, 36(5), 375–401.
  • Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540.
  • Forgatch, M. S., & Patterson, G. R. (2010). Parent management training—Oregon Model: An intervention for antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents, 2, 159–178.
  • Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system: Preschool, elementary level. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—A meta data-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translated research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381.
  • Hodges, K. (2004). The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 405–441). Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
  • Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124.
  • Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.
  • Knutson, N. M., Forgatch, M. S., Rains, L. A., & Sigmarsdottir, M. (2009). Fidelity of Implementation Rating System (FIMP): The manual for PMTO. Eugene, OR: Implementation Sciences International, Inc.
  • Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors' introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 528–530.
  • Patterson, G. R. (1982). A social learning approach: Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia Publishing Company.
  • Permanency Innovations Initiative Training and Technical Assistance Project (PII-TTAP) & Permanency Innovations Initiative Evaluation Team (PII-ET). (2013). The PII approach: Building implementation and evaluation capacity in child welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Administration for Children and Families, Children's Bureau & Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/implementation_and_evaluation_capacity.pdf
  • Reed-Ashcraft, K., Kirk, R. S., & Fraser, M. W. (2001). The reliability and validity of the North Carolina family assessment scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 11(4), 503–520.
  • Scriven, M. (1997). Truth and objectivity in evaluation Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 477–500). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Testa, M. F., & Poertner, J. (2010). Fostering accountability: Using evidence to guide and improve child welfare policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Testa, M. F., & White, K. R. (2014). Insuring the integrity and validity of social work interventions: The case of the subsidized guardianship waiver experiments. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11(1–2), 157–172.
  • Zelen, M. (1979). A new design for randomized clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 300, 1242–1245.
  • Zelen, M. (1990). Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: An update. Statistics in Medicine, 9, 645–656.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.