Identifying families who may be struggling after adoption or guardianship

References

• Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2010). Funding permanency services: A guide to leveraging federal, state, and local dollars. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/resources/funding-permanency-services/
   Google Scholar
• Averett, P., Nalavany, B., & Ryan, S. (2009). An evaluation of gay/lesbian and heterosexual adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 12(3–4), 129–151. doi:10.1080/10926750903313278
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, M., Propp, J., & Martens, P. (2007). The use of intensive family preservation services with adoptive families. Child & Family Social Work, 12(1), 43–53. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00426.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannan, A. M., Helfinger, C. A., & Bickman, L. (1997). The caregiver strain questionnaire: Measuring the impact of the family of living with a child with a serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 5(4), 212–222. doi:10.1177/106342669700500404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodzinsky, D., & Smith, S. L. (2019). Commentary: Understanding research, policy, and practice issues in adoption instability. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(2), 185–194. doi:10.1177/1049731518782647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruskas, D. (2008). Children in foster care: A vulnerable population at risk. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 21(2), 70–77. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6171.2008.00134.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardoso, J. B., Padilla, Y. C., & Sampson, M. (2010). Racial and ethnic variation in the predictors of maternal parenting stress. Journal of Social Service Research, 36(5), 429–444. doi:10.1080/01488376.2010.510948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2013). Preparing and supporting foster parents who adopt. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, T. (2002). After adoption: Dissolution or permanence? Child Welfare, 81(3), 515–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freundlich, M., Avery, R. J., Gerstenzang, S., & Munson, S. (2006). Post-permanency: An assessment for families’ needs for services and supports. Journal of Family Strengths, 9(1), 1–17. Article 5.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L., Cushing, G., Freundlich, M., & Brenner, E. (2008). Achieving permanency for youth in foster care: Assessing and strengthening emotional security. Child & Family Social Work, 13(2), 218–226. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartinger-Saunders, R. M., Trouteaud, A., & Matos Johnson, J. (2015). The effects of postadoption service need and use on child and adoptive parent outcomes. Journal of Social Service Research, 41(1), 75–92. doi:10.1080/01488376.2014.953286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartinger-Saunders, R. M., & Trouteaud, A. R. (2015). Underserved adoptive families: Disparities in postadoption access to information, resources, and services. Journal of Family Strengths, 15(1). Article 6. Available at http://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/jfs/vol15/iss1/6
   Google Scholar
• Koh, E., & Testa, M. F. (2011). Children discharged from kin and non-kin foster homes: Do the risks of foster care re-entry differ? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(9), 1497–1505. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, M., & Testa, M. (2016). Postadoption and guardianship: An evaluation of the adoption preservation, assessment, and linkage program. Research on Social Work Practice, 26(6), 675–685. doi:10.1177/1049731514564600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, M., & White, K. R. (2014). Post-permanency service needs, service utilization, and placement discontinuity for kinship versus non-kinship families. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 370–378. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariscal, E. S., Akin, B. A., Lieberman, A. A., & Washington, D. (2015). Exploring the path from foster care to stable and lasting adoption: Perceptions of foster care alumni. Children and Youth Services Review, 55, 111–120. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalavany, B. A., Ryan, S. D., Howard, J. A., & Smith, S. L. (2008). Preadoptive child sexual abuse as a predictor of moves in care, adoption disruptions, and inconsistent adoptive parent commitment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32(12), 1084–1088. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, R. R., Litrownik, A. J., & Landsverk, J. A. (2000). Children and youth in foster care: Disentangling the relationship between problem behaviors and number of placements. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(10), 1363–1374. doi:10.1016/s0145-2134(00)00189-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios, J., Rolock, N., Selwyn, J., & Barbosa-Ducharne, M. A. (2019). Adoption breakdown: Concept, research and implications. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(2), 130–142. doi:10.1177/1049731518783852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parolini, A., Shlonsky, A., Magruder, J., Eastman, A. L., Wulczyn, F., & Webster, D. (2018). Age and other risk factors related to reentry to care from kin and guardian homes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 315–324. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, A. G. (2017). Classifying relational permanence among young adults who exited foster care through legal permanence as adolescents. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 98(3), 179–189. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.2017.98.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. L., & Zill, N. (1986). Behavior problems index. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48(2), 295–307. doi:10.2307/352397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320–1350. doi:10.1086/230191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringeisen, H., Stambaugh, L., Rolock, N., Domanico, R., Barclay, A., White, K., … Casanueva, C. (2020). Understanding post adoption and guardianship instability for children and youth who exit foster care: Study design options. OPRE Report # 2020-35. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Rolock, N. (2015). Post-permanency continuity: What happens after adoption and guardianship from foster care? Journal of Public Child Welfare, 9(2), 153–173. doi:10.1080/15548732.2015.1021986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolock, N., & Fong, R. (2019). Supporting adoption and guardianship: Evaluation of the national quality improvement center for adoption and guardianship support and preservation (QIC-AG) – final evaluation report. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2186/ksl:2006056692
   Google Scholar
• Rolock, N., & Pérez, A. G. (2016). Three sides to a foster care story: An examination of the lived experiences of young adults, their foster care case record, and the space in between. Qualitative Social Work. doi:10.1177/1473325016666410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolock, N., Pérez, A. G., White, K. R., & Fong, R. (2018). From foster care to adoption and guardianship: A 21st century challenge. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35, 11–20. doi:10.1007/s10560-017-0499-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolock, N., & White, K. R. (2016). Post-permanency discontinuity: A longitudinal examination of outcomes for foster youth after adoption or guardianship. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 419–427. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolock, N., & White, K. R. (2017). Continuity for children after guardianship versus adoption with kin: Approximating the right counterfactual. Child Abuse & Neglect, 72, 32–44. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolock, N., White, K. R., Ocasio, K., Zhang, L., MacKenzie, M. J., & Fong, R. (2019). A comparison of post-adoption placement stability for former foster youth in two large U.S. states. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(2), 153–164. doi:10.1177/1049731518783857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. D., Nelson, N., & Siebert, C. F. (2009). Examining the facilitators and barriers faced by adoptive professionals delivering post-placement services. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 584–593. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, J., Wijedasa, D., & Meakings, S. (2014). Beyond the adoption order: Challenges, interventions and disruption. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/beyond-the-adoption-order-challenges-intervention-disruption
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. P. (2005). Agency theory. In K. S. Hook & D. S. Massey (Eds.), Annual review of sociology 31 (pp. 263–284). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Shrive, F. M., Stuart, H., Quan, H., & Ghali, W. A. (2006). Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: A comparison of imputation methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology.;6, (57), 1471–2288. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-57
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. L. (2010). Keeping the promise: The critical need for post-adoption services to enable children and families to succeed: Policy and practice perspective. Retrieved from https://www.adoptioninstitute.org/publications/keeping-the-promise-the-critical-need-for-post-adoption-services-to-enable-children-and-families-to-succeed/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. L., Howard, J. A., Garnier, P. C., & Ryan, S. D. (2006). Where are we now?: A post-ASFA examination of adoption disruption. Adoption Quarterly, 9(4), 19–44. doi:10.1300/J145v09n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Testa, M. F. (2004). When children cannot return home: Adoption and guardianship. The Future of Children, 14(1), 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa, M. F. (2010). Introduction. In M. F. Testa & J. Poertner (Eds.), Fostering accountability: Using evidence to guide and improve child welfare policy (pp. 3–34). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Testa, M. F. (2013). Systems of kinship care: Enduring challenges and emerging opportunities. Journal of Family Social Work, 16(5), 349–363. doi:10.1080/10522158.2013.834169
   Google Scholar
• Testa, M. F., Snyder, S., Wu, Q., Rolock, N., & Liao, M. (2015). Adoption and guardianship: A moderated mediation analysis of predictors of post-permanency continuity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85, 107–118. doi:10.1037/ort0000019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. R. (2016). Placement discontinuity for older children and adolescents who exit foster care through adoption or guardianship: A systematic review. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33(4), 377–394. doi:10.1007/s10560-015-0425-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. R., Rolock, N., Testa, M. F., Ringeisen, H., Childs, S., Johnson, S., & Diamant-Wilson, R. (2018). Understanding post adoption and guardianship instability for children and youth who exit foster care. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• White, K. R., Testa, M. F., & Rolock, N. (2019). Evaluation of the illinois adoption preservation and linkages (APAL) program using a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1–28. doi:10.1080/15548732.2019.1674234
   Google Scholar
• White, K. R., & Wu, Q. (2014). Application of the life course perspective in child welfare research. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 146–154. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar