1,266
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Tuning in to Teens (TINT) with adoptive parents and guardians in the US: the replication phase of intervention research

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 22-51 | Received 02 Mar 2020, Accepted 02 Nov 2020, Published online: 21 Dec 2020

References

  • Adamson, J., Cockayne, S., Puffer, S., & Torgerson, D. J. (2006). Review of randomised trials using the post-randomised consent (Zelen’s) design. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 27, 305–319. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2005.11.003
  • Akin, B. A., Testa, M. F., McDonald, T. P., Melz, H., Blase, K. A., & Barclay, A. (2014). Formative evaluation of an evidence-based intervention to reduce long-term foster care: Assessing readiness for summative evaluation. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 8(4), 354–374. doi:10.1080/15548732.2014.939250
  • Alameda-Lawson, T., Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2010). Social workers’ roles in facilitating the collective involvement of low-income, culturally diverse parents in an elementary school. Children & Schools, 32(3), 172–182. doi:10.1093/cs/32.3.172
  • Averett, P., Nalavany, B., & Ryan, S. (2009). An evaluation of gay/lesbian and heterosexual adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 12(3–4), 129–151. doi:10.1080/10926750903313278
  • Berry, M., Propp, J., & Martens, P. (2007). The use of intensive family preservation services with adoptive families. Child & Family Social Work, 12(1), 43–53. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00426.x
  • Blase, K., Kiser, L., & Van Dyke, M. (2013). The hexagon tool: Exploring context. Chapel Hill. In NC: National implementation research Network. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: FPG Child Development Institute.
  • Bruskas, D. (2010). Developmental health of infants and children subsequent to foster care. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23(4), 231–241. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00249.x
  • Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2005). Post-legal adoption services for children with special needs and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
  • Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2018). Providing Adoption Support and Preservation Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
  • Christian, J., Armitage, C. J., & Abrams, D. (2003). Predicting uptake of housing services: The role of self-categorization in the theory of planned behaviour. Current Psychology, 22(3), 206–217. doi:10.1007/s12144-003-1017-3
  • Clemens, E. V., Klopfenstein, K., Lalonde, T. L., & Tis, M. (2018). The effects of placement and school stability on academic growth trajectories of students in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 87, 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.02.015
  • Committee on Ways and Means (CWM) of the U.S. House of Representatives. (2018). 2018 Green book: Background material and data on the programs within the jurisdiction of the committee on ways and means. Washington, DC, USA. http://greenbook.waysandmeans.house.gov.
  • Corbie-Smith, G., Thomas, S., Williams, M., & Moody-Ayers, S. (1999). Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14(9), 537–546. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07048.x
  • Counts, J. M., Buffington, E. S., Chang-Rios, K., Rasmussen, H. N., & Preacher, K. J. (2010). The development and validation of the protective factors survey: A self-report measure of protective factors against child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(10), 762–772. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.03.003
  • Cross, T. (2008). Cultural competence. In T. Mizrahi & L. Davis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Work (pp. 20t). h ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Crumbley, J. (2017, October 14). Engaging kinship caregivers [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Annie E Casey Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.aecf.org/blog/engaging-kinship-caregivers-with-joseph-crumbley/
  • Crumbley, J., & Little, R. L. (1997). Relatives raising children: An overview of kinship care. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
  • Egbert, S. C. (2015). Supporting and strengthening foster adoptive families: Utah’s story of post-adoption service development, delivery, and ongoing evaluation. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 9(1), 88–113.
  • Ellenberg, S. (1984). Randomization designs in comparative clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 310, 1401–1408. doi:10.1056/NEJM198405243102141
  • Featherstone, B., & Broadhurst, K. (2003). Engaging parents and carers with family support services: What can be learned from research on help‐seeking? Child & Family Social Work, 8(4), 341–350. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2206.2003.00289.x
  • Festinger, T. (2002). After adoption: Dissolution or permanence? Child Welfare, 81(3), 515–533.
  • Festinger, T., & Maza, P. (2009). Displacement or post-adoption placement? A research note. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(3), 275–286. http://doi.org/10.1080/15548730903129889
  • Fong, R., McRoy, R. G., & McGinnis, H. (2016). Overview of intercountry adoptions. In R. Fong & R. G. McRoy (Eds.), Transracial and intercountry adoptions: Cultural guidance for professionals (pp. pp. 19–37). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Fraser, M. W., Richman, J. M., Galinsky, M. J., & Day, S. H. (2009). Intervention research: Developing social programs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Freundlich, M. (2007). Postadoption services: Meeting the mental health needs of children adopted from foster care. St. Paul, MN: North American Council on Adoptable Children.
  • Frey, L., Cushing, G., Freundlich, M., & Brenner, E. (2008). Achieving permanency for youth in foster care: Assessing and strengthening emotional security. Child & Family Social Work, 13(2), 218–226. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00539.x
  • Fuller, T. L., Bruhn, C., Cohen, L., Lis, M., Rolock, N., & Sheridan, K. (2006). Supporting adoptions and guardianships in Illinois: An analysis of subsidies, services, and spending. Final report. Urbana, IL: Children and Family Research Center.
  • Goering, E. S., & Shaw, T. V. (2017). Foster Care Reentry: A survival analysis assessing differences across permanency type. Child Abuse & Neglect, 68, 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.005
  • Golden, O., & Macomber, J. (2009). The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA). In Intentions and Results: A Look Back at the Adoption and Safe Families Act (pp. 8-34). Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/1001351_safe_families_act.pdf
  • Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1997). Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  • Groze, V. (1996). A 1 and 2 year follow-up study of adoptive families and special needs children. Children and Youth Services Review, 18(1–2), 57–82. doi:10.1016/0190-7409(95)00054-2
  • Hanna, M., Tokarski, K., Matera, D., & Fong, R. (2011). Happily ever after? The journey from foster care to adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 14(2), 107–131. doi:10.1080/10926755.2011.560789
  • Hartinger-Saunders, R. M., Trouteaud, A., & Matos Johnson, J. (2015). Post adoption service need and use as predictors of adoption dissolution: Findings from the 2012 national adoptive families study. Adoption Quarterly, 18(4), 255–272.
  • Havighurst, S. S., Harley, A. E., Kehoe, C., & Pizarro, E. (2012). Tuning in to teens: Emotionally intelligent parenting program manual. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
  • Havighurst, S. S., Kehoe, C. E., & Harley, A. E. (2015). Tuning in to teens: Improving parental responses to anger and reducing youth externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Adolescence, 42, 148–158. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.04.005
  • Hinterlong, J., & Ryan, S. (2008, Aug). Creating grander families: Older adults adopting younger kin and nonkin. Gerontologist, 48(4), 527–536. doi:10.1093/geront/48.4.527
  • Howard, J. A., Smith, S. L., Zosky, D. L., & Woodman, K. (2006). A comparison of subsidized guardianship and child welfare adoptive families served by the Illinois adoption and guardianship preservation program. Journal of Social Service Research, 32(3), 123–134. doi:10.1300/J079v32n03_07
  • Huntington-Klein, N. (2017). Estimating local average treatment effects in aggregate data. Applied Economics Letters, 24(11), 762–765. doi:10.1080/13504851.2016.1226483
  • Jones, A. S., & LaLiberte, T. (2010). Adoption disruption and dissolution report. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • Jones, V. F., & Schulte, E. E. (2019). Comprehensive health evaluation of the newly adopted child. & Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care Pediatrics, 143(5), e20190657. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-0657
  • Kehoe, C. E. (2014). Tuning in to Teens: Examining the efficacy of an emotion-focused parenting intervention in reducing pre-adolescents’ internalising difficulties (Doctoral dissertation). University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences.
  • Kehoe, C. E., Havighurst, S. S., & Harley, A. E. (2014). Tuning in to Teens: Improving parent emotion socialization to reduce youth internalizing difficulties. Social Development, 23(2), 413–431. doi:10.1111/sode.12060
  • Kehoe, C. E., Havighurst, S. S., & Harley, A. E. (2015). Somatic complaints in early adolescence: The role of parents’ emotion socialization. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(7), 966–989. doi:10.1177/0272431614547052
  • Kehoe, C. E., Havighurst, S. S., & Harley, A. E. (2020). Tuning in to Teens: Investigating moderators of program effects and mechanisms of change of an emotion focused group parenting program. Developmental Psychology, 56(3), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000875 3
  • Kehoe, C. E., Havighurst, S. S., & Harley, A. E. (in press). Tuning in to teens: Investigating moderators of program effects and mechanisms of change in an emotion-focused group parenting program. Special Issue on Parental Socialization of Emotion and Self-Regulation: Understanding Processes and Application. Developmental Psychologist.
  • Kemp, S. P., Marcenko, M. O., Hoagwood, K., & Vesneski, W. (2009). Engaging parents in child welfare services: Bridging family needs and child welfare mandates. Child Welfare, 88(1), 101–126.
  • Koh, E., & Testa, M. F. (2011). Children discharged from kin and non-kin foster homes: Do the risks of foster care re-entry differ? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(9), 1497–1505. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.009
  • Lavner, J. A., Waterman, J., & Peplau, L. A. (2012, Oct). Can gay and lesbian parents promote healthy development in high-risk children adopted from foster care? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(4), 465–472. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01176.x
  • Liao, M., & Testa, M. (2016). Postadoption and guardianship: An evaluation of the adoption preservation, assessment, and linkage program. Research on Social Work Practice, 26(6), 675–685. doi:10.1177/1049731514564600
  • Liao, M., & White, K. R. (2014). Post-permanency service needs, service utilization, and placement discontinuity for kinship versus non-kinship families. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 370–378. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.07.007
  • Mariscal, E. S., Akin, B. A., Lieberman, A. A., & Washington, D. (2015). Exploring the path from foster care to stable and lasting adoption: Perceptions of foster care alumni. Children and Youth Services Review, 55, 111–120. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.05.017
  • Merritt, D. H., & Festinger, T. (2013). Post-adoption service need and access: Differences between international, kinship and non-kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 1913–1922. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.013
  • Nalavany, B. A., Glidden, L. M., & Ryan, S. D. (2009). Parental satisfaction in the adoption of children with learning disorders: The role of behavior problems. Family Relations, 58(5), 621–633. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00579.x
  • New Jersey department of children and families. (2016). Adoption report 2016. Retrieved from https://www.nj.gov/dcf/childdata/exitplan/AdoptionReport2016.pdf
  • Ocasio, K., Rolock, N., White, K., Cho, Y., Diamant-Wilson, R., MacKenzie, M., … Fong, R. (2019). Evaluation results from New Jersey: Final evaluation report. In N. Rolock & R. Fong (Eds.), Supporting adoption and guardianship: Evaluation of the national quality improvement center for adoption and guardianship support and preservation (QIC-AG)-Final evaluation report (pp. 51). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau. 5–73 http://hdl.handle.net/2186/ksl:2006056697
  • Orsi, R. (2015). Predicting re-involvement for children adopted out of a public child welfare system. Child Abuse Neglect, 39, 175–184. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.10.005
  • Palacios, J., Rolock, N., Selwyn, J., & Barbosa-Ducharne, M. A. (2019). Adoption breakdown: Concept, research and implications. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(2), 130–142. doi:10.1177/1049731518783852
  • Parolini, A., Shlonsky, A., Magruder, J., Eastman, A. L., Wulczyn, F., & Webster, D. (2018). Age and other risk factors related to reentry to care from kin and guardian homes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 315–324. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.024
  • Peterson, J. L., & Zill, N. (1986). Behavior problems index. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48(2), 295–307. doi:10.2307/352397
  • Rolock, N. (2015). Post-permanency continuity: What happens after adoption and guardianship from foster care? Journal of Public Child Welfare, 9(2), 153–173. doi:10.1080/15548732.2015.1021986
  • Rolock, N., & Fong, R. (2019). Supporting adoption and guardianship: Evaluation of the national quality improvement center for adoption and guardianship support and preservation (QIC-AG) – Final evaluation report. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau. http://hdl.handle.net/2186/ksl:2006056692
  • Rolock, N., Ocasio, K., Webb, J., Fleary-Simmons, D., Cohen, L., & Fong, R. (2019). Implementation science and prevention in action: Application in a post-permanency world. Journal of Evidence-based Social Work, 16(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/23761407.2018.1517068
  • Rolock, N., & Pérez, A. G. (2018). Three sides to a foster care story: An examination of the lived experiences of young adults, their foster care case record, and the space in between. Qualitative Social Work, 17(2), 195–215. doi:10.1177/1473325016666410
  • Rolock, N., Pérez, A. G., White, K. R., & Fong, R. (2018). From foster care to adoption and guardianship: A 21st century challenge. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35, 11–20. doi:10.1007/s10560-017-0499-z
  • Rolock, N., & White, K. R. (2016). Post-permanency discontinuity: A longitudinal examination of outcomes for foster youth after adoption or guardianship. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 419–427. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.025
  • Rolock, N., & White, K. R. (2017). Continuity for children after guardianship versus adoption with kin: Approximating the right counterfactual. Child Abuse & Neglect, 72, 32–44. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.001
  • Rolock, N., White, K. R., Ocasio, K., Zhang, L., MacKenzie, M. J., & Fong, R. (2019). A comparison of post-adoption placement stability for former foster youth in two large U.S. states. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(2), 153–164. doi:10.1177/1049731518783857
  • Rubin, D. M., O’Reilly, A. R., Luan, X., & Localio, R. (2007). The impact of placement stability on behavioral well-being for children in foster care. Pediatrics, 119, 336–344. Retrieved from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/119/2/336.full.html
  • Ryan, S. D., Hinterlong, J., Hegar, R. L., & Johnson, L. B. (2010). Kin adopting kin: In the best interest of the children? Children and Youth Services Review, 32(12), 1631–1639. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.06.013
  • Samuels, G. M. (2008). A reason, a season, or a lifetime: Relational permanence among young adults with foster care backgrounds. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
  • Selwyn, J., Wijedasa, D., & Meakings, S. (2014). Beyond the adoption order: Challenges, interventions and disruption. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/beyond-the-adoption-order-challenges-intervention-disruption
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Simmel, C., Barth, R. P., & Brooks, D. (2007). Adopted foster youths? Psychosocial functioning: A longitudinal perspective. Child & Family Social Work, 12(4), 336–348. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00481.x
  • Smith, S. L., Howard, J. A., & Monroe, A. D. (1998). An analysis of child behavior problems in adoptions in difficulty. Journal of Social Service Research, 24, 1–2. 61–84 doi:10.1300/J079v24n01_03.
  • Smith, S. L., Maza, P., Magruder, J., Sciamanna, J., & Howard, J. (2014). Keeping the promise: The case for adoption support and preservation. Retrieved from http:/www.adoptioninstitute.org/publications/keeping-the-promise-the-case-for-adoption-support-and-preservation/.
  • Testa, M. F. (2002). Subsidized guardianship: Testing an idea whose time has finally come. Social Work Research, 26(3), 145–158. doi:10.1093/swr/26.3.145.
  • Testa, M. F. (2004). When children cannot return home: Adoption and guardianship. The Future of Children, 14(1), 114–129. doi:10.2307/1602757.
  • Testa, M. F. (2008). New permanency strategies for children in foster care. In I. D. Lindsey & A. R. Shlonsky (Eds.), Child welfare research: Advances for practice and policy (pp. pp. 108–124). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Testa, M. F., Snyder, S., Wu, Q., Rolock, N., & Liao, M. (2015). Adoption and guardianship: A moderated mediation analysis of predictors of post-permanency continuity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85, 107–118. doi:10.1037/ort0000019
  • Testa, M. F., & White, K. R. (2014). Insuring the integrity and validity of social work interventions: The case of the subsidized guardianship waiver experiments. Journal of Evidence-based Social Work, 11(1–2), 157–172. doi:10.1080/15433714.2013.847260
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2011). Synthesis of findings: Subsidized guardianship child welfare waiver demonstrations. Washington, DC.
  • UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. (2013). Repeated measures analysis with Stata [Seminar]. Retrieved from https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/seminars/repeated-measures-analysis-with-stata/
  • USHHS: Children’s Bureau. (2020). Title IV-E guardianship assistance. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/resource/title-iv-e-guardianship-assistance
  • Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.
  • White, K. R. (2016). Placement discontinuity for older children and adolescents who exit foster care through adoption or guardianship: A systematic review. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33(4), 377–394. doi:10.1007/s10560-015-0425-1
  • White, K. R., Rolock, N., Testa, M. F., Ringeisen, H., Childs, S., Johnson, S., & Diamant-Wilson, R. (2018). Understanding post adoption and guardianship instability for children and youth who exit foster care. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  • White, K. R., Testa, M. F., & Rolock, N. (2019). Evaluation of the Illinois adoption preservation and linkages (APAL) program using a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1–28. doi:10.1080/15548732.2019.1674234
  • Zelen, M. (1979). A new design for randomized clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 300(22), 1242–1245. doi:10.1056/NEJM197905313002203
  • Zelen, M. (1990). Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: An update. Statistics in Medicine, 9(6), 645–656. doi:10.1002/sim.4780090611

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.