1,932
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Applying the Logic Model Process to Employee Assistance Programming

, MSW, PhD, RSW, , MSc, , MSW & , BSW

REFERENCES

  • Alter, C., & Murty, S. (1997). Logic modeling: A tool for teaching practice evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(1), 103–118.
  • Conrad, K., Randolph, F., Kirby, M., & Bebout, R. (1999). Creating and using logic models: Four perspectives. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 17(1/2), 17–31.
  • Cooksy, L., Gill, P., & Kelly, P. (2001). The program logic model as in integrative framework for a multi-method evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(2), 119–128.
  • Csiernik, R. (1995). A review of research methods used to examine Employee Assistance Program delivery options. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(1), 25–36.
  • Csiernik, R. (2005). A review of EAP evaluation in the 1990s. Journal of Employee Assistance and Workplace Behavioral Health, 19(4), 21–37.
  • Csiernik, R. (2011). The glass is filling: An examination of Employee Assistance Program Evaluations in the first decade of the new millennium. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 26(4), 344–355.
  • Csiernik, R., Chaulk, P., & McQuaid, S. (2012). A process evaluation of a Canadian public sector Employee Assistance Program. Journal of Workplace Behavioural Health, 27(3), lfir–180.
  • Daniels, A., Teems, L., & Carroll, C. (2005). Transforming Employee Assistance Programs by crossing the quality chasm. International Journal of Mental Health, 34(1), 37–54.
  • Finlay, P., Forsey, G., & Wilson, J. (1988). The validation of expert systems - contrasts with traditional methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39(10), 933–938.
  • French, M., Zarkin, G., & Bray, J. (1995). A methodology for evaluating the costs and benefits of Employee Assistance Programs. Journal of Drug Issues, 25(2), 451–470.
  • Hendricks, M., Plantz, M., & Pritchard, K. (2008). Measuring outcomes of United Way funded programs: Expectations and reality. In J. G. Carman & K. A. Fredericks (Eds.), Nonprofits and evaluation: New directions for evaluation (pp. 13–35). Sommerset, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
  • Holosko, M. (1988). Prerequisites of EAP Evaluation: A case for more thoughtful evaluation planning. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 3(3/4), 59–67.
  • Hughes, D., Elkin, C., & Epstein, I. (2004). Long term counseling: A feasibility study of extended follow-up services from high-risk EAP clients. Journal of Employee Assistance, 24(1), 15–18.
  • Jerrell, J., & Rightmyer, J. (1982). Evaluating Employee Assistance Programs: A review of methods, outcomes, and future directions. Evaluation and Program Planning, 5(3), 255–267.
  • Jordan, G. (2010). A theory-based logic model for innovation policy and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 19(4), 263–273.
  • Kellogg Foundation. (2001). Logic model development guide. Battlefield Creek, MI: Author.
  • Kimbrough, S., & Lee, R. (1988). Logic modeling: A tool for management science. Decision Support Systems, 4(1), 3–16.
  • Knowlton, L., & Phillips, C. (2009). The logic model guidebook: Better strategies for great results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Masi, D., & Jacobson, J. (2003). Outcome measurements of an Integrated Employee Assistance and Work-Life program. Research on Social Work Practice, 13(4), 451–467.
  • Morell, J. (2005). Why are there unintended consequences of program action, and what are the implications for doing evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 26(4), 444–463.
  • Nelson, G., & Smith Fowler, H. (1987). Housing for the chronically mentally disabled: Part II – process and outcome. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 6(2), 79–91.
  • Orren, C., & Terblanche, L. (2009). An impact and cost-benefit analysis of an Employee Assistance Program at a South African bank. Social Work: Maatskapilke Werk, 45(4), 428–442.
  • Porteous, N., Sheldrick, B., & Stewart, P. (2002). Introducing program teams to logic models: Facilitating the learning process. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 17(3), 113–141.
  • Renger, R. (2006).Consequences to federal programs when the logic-modeling process is not followed with fidelity. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(4), 452–463.
  • Renger, R., & Titcomb, A. (2002). The three-step approach to teaching logic models. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(4), 493–503.
  • Savaya, R., & Waysman, M. (2005). The logic model. Administration in Social Work, 29(2), 85–103.
  • Sharar, D., & Hertenstein, E. (2008). Perspectives on elevating quality in EAP through standards enforcement: A survey of key informants in the EAP field. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 21(1), 53–65.
  • Sieberhagen, C., Pienaar, J., & Els, C. (2011). Management of employee wellness in South Africa: Employer, service provider and union perspectives: Original research. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(1), 1–14.
  • Taylor-Powell, E., & Henert, E. (2008). Developing a logic model: Teaching and training guide. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation.
  • Thompson, J., Kyes, K., Cheadle, A., Bombardier, C., Jacobsen, R., Stewart, P., … Sorenson, K. (2005). Evaluation of a peer support program to reduce substance abuse within a large manufacturing company. Journal of Employee Assistance, 35(3), 14–17.
  • United Way of America. (1996). Measuring program outcomes. Alexandria, VA.: Author.
  • Van Koperen, T., Jebb, S., Summerbell, C., Visscher, T., Romon, M., Borys, J., & Seidell, J. (2013). Characterizing the EPODE logic model: Unravelling the past and informing the future. Obesity Reviews, 14(2), 162–170.
  • Wang, C. W., Lin, P. C., & Sha, C. (2014). Employee problems and their consequences in the technology industry: Evidence from surveys and counseling records. Psychological Reports, 114(3), 687–719.
  • Weiss, C. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 76(1), 41–55.
  • Wrich, J. (1980). The Employee Assistance Program. Centre City, MN: Hazelden.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.