Relationships Among Perceived Supervisor Support, Psychological Empowerment and Employee Engagement in Indian Workplaces

REFERENCES

• Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake-Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, S. L., & Andreetta, M. (2011). The influence of empowering leadership, empowerment and engagement on affective commitment and turnover intentions in community health service workers: Test of a model. Leadership in Health Services, 24(3), 228–237.
   Google Scholar
• Aryee, S., & Chen, Z. X. (2006). Leader–member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 793–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attridge, M. (2009). Measuring and managing employee work engagement: A review of the research and business literature. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 24(4), 383–398.
   Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 951–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(2), 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, J. (2005). The power of psychological empowerment as an antecedent to organizational commitment in Indian managers. Human Resource Development International, 8(4), 419–433.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of innovation: Role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 928–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blessing White. (2011). Employee engagement report 2011: Beyond the numbers: A practical approach for individuals, managers and executives, 1–80. Retrieved from http://www.blessingwhite.com/content/reports/BlessingWhite_2011_EE_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, C., Bartram, T., & Casimir, G. (2006). The antecedents and consequences of psychological empowerment among Singaporean IT employees. Management Research News, 30(1), 34–46.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, S. A. (2004). Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between psychological climate and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 405–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, R., Rangnekar, S., & Barua, M. K. (2012). Relationships between occupational self efficacy, human resource development climate, and work engagement. Team Performance Management, 18(7/8), 370–383.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, J., Lu, K., Chang, Y., & Johnstone, S. (2013). Voice behaviour and work engagement: The moderating role of supervisor–attributed motives. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 81–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte Human Capital Advisory Services. (2012). Compensation Trends Survey 2012 (pp. 1–98). India: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India Private Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Dewettinck, K., & van Ameijde, M. (2011). Linking leadership empowerment behaviour to employee attitudes and behavioural intentions: Testing the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 40(3), 284–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2013). Perceived job autonomy and turnover intention: The moderating role of perceived supervisor support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(5), 563–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2006). Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P., & Taylor, C. R. (2004). The race for talent: Retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century. Human Resource Planning, 27(3), 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M., & Mitchell, T. N. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, P., Laschinger, H. K., & Wong, C. (2006). Leader empowering behaviours, staff nurse empowerment and work engagement/burnout. Nursing Research, 19(4), 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, B. T., Albritton, M. D., & Osmonbekov, T. (2010). The mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relationships between P-O fit, job satisfaction, and in-role performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 639–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. New Delhi, India: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jose, G., & Mampilly, S. R. (2014). Psychological empowerment as a predictor of employee engagement: An empirical attestation. Global Business Review, 15(1), 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatri, N. (2011). A taxonomy of supervisor–subordinate exchanges across cultures. IIMB Management Review, 23(2), 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Koyuncu, M., Burke, R. J., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2006). Work engagement among women managers and professionals in a Turkish bank: Potential antecedents and consequences. Equal Opportunities International, 25(4), 299–310.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R., & May, B. (1998). A win - win paradigm for quality of work life and business performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9(3), 211–226.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(4), 370–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, D., & Clarke, N. (2009). The MacLeod Review – Engaging for success: Enhancing performance through employee engagement. London, UK: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcfarlin, D. B., & Coget, J. (2013). How does empowerment work in high and low power distance cultures? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2). doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0063
   Google Scholar
• Medhurst, A., & Albrecht, S. (2011). Salesperson engagement and performance: A theoretical model. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(3), 398–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menguc, B., Auh, S., Fisher, M., & Haddad, A. (2013). To be engaged or not to be engaged: The antecedents and consequences of service employee engagement. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2163–2170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, S. T. (1995). Employee empowerment: Definition, measurement and construct validation. Montreal, Canada: McGill University Press. Retrieved from http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=29088&silo_library=GEN01
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–98.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, S. L., & Kline, T. J. B. (2008). Psychological and environmental empowerment: Antecedents and consequences. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(5), 444–460.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad, A. H., & Hamdy, H. I. (2005). Burnout, supervisory support, and work outcomes: A study from an Arabic cultural perspective. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 15(3), 230–243.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2007). Engagement: The continuing story. Institute for Employment Studies. Retrieved from www.employment-studies.co.uk/pubs/summary.php?id=447
   Google Scholar
• Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuck, B., Reio, T. G., & Rocco, T. S. (2011). Employee engagement: An examination of antecedent and outcome variables. Human Resource Development International, 14(4), 427–445.
   Google Scholar
• Shuck, B., & Wollard, K. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Slatten, T., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2011). Antecedents and effects of engaged frontline employees: A study from the hospitality industry. Managing Service Quality, 21(1), 88–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13(1), 290–312.
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment, and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 670–704.
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M., Lam, C. F., & Fritz, C. (2010). Engagement and human thriving: Complementary perspectives on energy and connections to work. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 132–146). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P., & Bhatnagar, J. (2008). Talent acquisition due diligence leading to high employee engagement: Case of Motorola India MDB. Industrial and Commercial Training, 40(5), 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• Stander, M. W., & Rothmann, S. (2010). Psychological empowerment, job insecurity and employee engagement. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(1), 1–8. doi:10.4102/sajip.v36i1.849.
   Google Scholar
• Swanberg, J. E., McKechnie, S. P., Ojha, M. U., & James, J. B. (2011). Schedule control, supervisor support and work engagement: A winning combination for workers in hourly jobs? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(3), 613–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vianen, A. E. M., Shen, C. T., & Chuang, A. (2011). Person–organization and person–supervisor fit: Employee commitments in a Chinese context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(6), 906–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wat, D., & Shaffer, M. A. (2005). Equity and relationship quality influences on organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of trust in the supervisor and empowerment. Personnel Review, 34(4), 406–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, M. (2011). The evolution of the employee engagement concept: Communication implications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(4), 328–346.
   Google Scholar
• Wollard, K. K., & Shuck, B. (2011). Antecedents to employee engagement: A structured review of the literature. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(4), 429–446.
   Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar