Personality diversity in the workplace: A systematic literature review on introversion

References

• Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C., Flood, P. C., Guthrie, J. P., Liu, W., MacCurtain, S., & Mkamwa, T. (2010). The impact of diversity and equality management on firm performance: Beyond high performance work systems. Human Resource Management, 49(6), 977–998. doi:10.1002/hrm.20391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, S. M., Jenkins, J. S., & Barber, L. K. (2016). Home is private…Do not enter! Introversion and sensitivity to work-home conflict. Stress and Health, 32(4), 441–445. doi:10.1002/smi.2628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsari-Palsule, S., & Little, B. R. (2020). Quiet strengths: Adaptable introversion in the workplace. In L. A. Schmidt & K. L. Poole (Eds.), Adaptive shyness (pp. 181–197). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38877-5_10
   Google Scholar
• Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 62–78. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belojevic, G., Jakovljevic, B., & Slepcevic, V. (2003). Noise and mental performance: Personality attributes and noise sensitivity. Noise Health, 6(21), 77–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bendersky, C., & Shah, N. P. (2013). The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 387–406. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beus, J. M., Dhanani, L. Y., & McCord, M. A. (2015). A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: Addressing unanswered questions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 481–498. doi:10.1037/a0037916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielby, W. T. (2000). Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1), 120–129. doi:10.2307/2654937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins, D. P., Stackhouse, M. R. D., & Dionne, S. D. (2021). Righting the balance: Understanding introverts (and extraverts) in the workplace. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(1), 78–98. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortoluzzi, B., Carey, D., McArthur, J., & Menassa, C. (2018). Measurements of workplace productivity in the office context: A systematic review and current industry insights. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 20(4), 281–301. doi:10.1108/JCRE-10-2017-0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., & Kern, M. L. (2017). The benefit mindset: The psychology of contribution and everyday leadership. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(1), 1–11. doi:10.5502/ijw.v7i1.538
   Google Scholar
• Buss, A. H. (1986). A Theory of Shyness. In W. H. Jones, J. M. Cheek, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Shyness: Perspectives on research and treatment (pp. 39–46). New York: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0525-3_4
   Google Scholar
• Cain, S. (2012). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. New York: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., Eber, H., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1965). The scientific analysis of personality. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chay, Y. W. (1993). Social support, individual differences and well-being: A study of small business entrepreneurs and employees. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66(4), 285–302. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1993.tb00540.x
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the Neo personality inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 853–863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Cox-Fuenzalida, L. E., Angie, A., Holloway, S., & Sohl, L. (2006). Extraversion and task performance: A fresh look through the workload history lens. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 432–439. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delecta, P. (2011). Work life balance. International Journal of Current Research, 3(4), 186–189.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, M. T. M., van Dierendonck, D., Evers, A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2005). Conflict and well-being at work: The moderating role of personality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(2), 87–104. doi:10.1108/02683940510579740
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastburg, M. C., Williamson, M., Gorsuch, R., & Ridley, C. (1994). Social support, personality, and burnout in nurses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(14), 1233–1250. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00556.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez, A., Schilpzand, P., Leavitt, K., Woolum, A. H., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Inherently relational: Interactions between peers’ and individuals’ personalities impact reward giving and appraisal of individual performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1761–1784. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A. M., Meyers, M. C., De Calseyde, P. P. V., & Stavrova, O. (2021). Extroversion and conscientiousness predict deteriorating job outcomes during the COVID-19 transition to enforced remote work. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(3), 781–791. doi:10.1177/19485506211039092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (junior & adult). London: Hodder and Stoughton Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1964). An improved short questionnaire for the measurement of extraversion and neuroticism. Life Sciences, 3(10), 1103–1109. doi:10.1016/0024-3205(64)90125-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, S. B., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the Psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. (2017). Leadership reflections: Extrovert and introvert leaders. Journal of Library Administration, 57(4), 436–443. doi:10.1080/01930826.2017.1300455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foma, E. (2014). Impact of workplace diversity. Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research, 3(1), 402–410.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., & Philipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the revised Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the U.S.A. and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(4), 443–449. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90073-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2001). Personality and individual differences in the workplace: Person–organization–outcome fit. In B. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 223–251). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10434-009
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Bradley, A. (1997). Music while you work: The differential distraction of background music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extroverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(5), 445–455. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<445::AID-ACP472>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7(1), 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, L. E., & Bernet, P. (2019). Diversity improves performance and outcomes. Journal of the National Medical Association, 111(4), 383–392. doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2019.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, A. W., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1991). Person perception by introverts and extraverts under time pressure: Effects of need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 161–165. doi:10.1177/014616729101700207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, J., Hofstee, W., & Raad, B. (1999). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 307–325. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00245-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. www.handbook.cochrane.org.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. R., & Solomon, D. (1977). Human resources index occupational survey (Research Monograph Nos. 1 & 2). Professional Dynametric Program.
   Google Scholar
• Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools for use in JBI systematic reviews: Checklist for quasi-experimental studies (non-randomized experimental studies). Retrieved April 7, 2021, from https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI_Quasi-Experimental_Appraisal_Tool2017_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. M., Schulkin, J., & Schmidt, L. A. (2014). Shyness: Subtypes, psychosocial correlates, and treatment interventions. Psychology, 5(3), 244–254. doi:10.4236/psych.2014.53035
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. H., Lee, Y., & Karsten, R. (2012). The moderating effect of extraversion–introversion differences on group idea generation performance. Small Group Research, 43(1), 30–49. doi:10.1177/1046496411422130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawiana, I. G. P., Dewi, L. K. C., Martini, L. K. B., & Suardana, I. B. R. (2018). The influence of organizational culture, employee satisfaction, personality, and organizational commitment towards employee performance. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(3), 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkcaldy, B., Thome, E., & Thomas, W. (1989). Job satisfaction amongst psychosocial workers. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(2), 191–196. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90203-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., & Mahler, H. I. (1986). Self-confirmatory effects of delay on perceived contribution to a joint activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(3), 344–352. doi:10.1177/0146167286123009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, H., Kroon, B., & Poell, R. F. (2017). Personality testing and workplace training. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(3), 198–221. doi:10.1108/EJTD-03-2016-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63–78. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCord, M., & Joseph, D. (2020). A framework of negative responses to introversion at work. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, 109944. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingyi, Q., Guocheng, W., Rongchun, Z., & Shen, Z. (2000). Development of the revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire short scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32(3), 317.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, P. D., Kim, J., & Pettijohn, T. F. III. (2013). The role of mood and personality type on creativity. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 18(4), 148–156.
   Google Scholar
• NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. n.d. Study quality assessment tools – Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Retrieved July 6 from https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, P. J., Gardiner, E., & Watson, C. (2016). Learning to relax versus learning to ideate: Relaxation-focused creativity training benefits introverts more than extraverts. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 97–108. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes, K. R. (1986). Coping in stressful episodes: The role of individual differences, environmental factors, and situational characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1277–1292. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regts, G., & Molleman, E. (2016). The moderating influence of personality on individual outcomes of social networks. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(3), 656–682. doi:10.1111/joop.12147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. P., & Barber, L. K. (2019). Workplace intrusions and employee strain: The interactive effects of extraversion and emotional stability. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 32(3), 312–328. doi:10.1080/10615806.2019.1596671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., & Walmsley, P. T. (2014). Which personality attributes are most important in the workplace? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 538–551. doi:10.1177/1745691614543972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506–516. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1999). The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(2), 208–232. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickhouser, J. E., Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2017). Does personality predict health and well-being? A metasynthesis. Health Psychology, 36(8), 797–810. doi:10.1037/hea0000475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topi, H., Valacich, J. S., & Rao, M. T. (2002). The effects of personality and media differences on the performance of dyads addressing a cognitive conflict task. Small Group Research, 33(6), 667–701. doi:10.1177/1046496402238620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoye, G., & Turban, D. (2015). Applicant–employee fit in personality: Testing predictions from similarity-attraction theory and trait activation theory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 23, 210–223. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (2007). Group work in higher education: Are introverted students disadvantaged? Psychology Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 20–25. doi:10.2304/plat.2007.6.1.20
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767–793). San Diego: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50030-5
   Google Scholar
• Wijngaards, I., de Zilwa, S. C. S., & Burger, M. J. (2020). Extraversion moderates the relationship between the stringency of COVID-19 protective measures and depressive symptoms. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 568907. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmot, M. P., Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Ones, D. S. (2019). Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1447–1470. doi:10.1037/apl0000415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, Y., Zhao, S., Gao, X., An, Z., Wang, S., Li, H., … Dong, Z. (2018). General self-efficacy modifies the effect of stress on burnout in nurses with different personality types. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 667. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3478-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, X., Zhou, J., & Kwan, H. K. (2017). Configuring challenge and hindrance contexts for introversion and creativity: Joint effects of task complexity and guanxi management. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143, 54–68. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar