“We Are a Small Country That Has Done Enormously Lot”: The ‘Refugee Crisis’ and the Hybrid Discourse of Politicizing Immigration in Sweden

References

• Abiri, E. (2000). The changing praxis of “generosity”: Swedish refugee policy during the 1990s. Journal of Refugee Studies, 13(1), 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2016). Tackling the global refugee crisis: From shirking to sharing responsibility. London, UK: Amnesty International.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, J. (2007). Between Growth and Security. Swedish social democracy from a strong society to a third way. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, J. (2009). Nordic nostalgia and Nordic light. The Swedish model as Utopia 1930–2007. Scandinavian Journal of History, 34(3), 229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buonfino, A. (2004). Between unity and plurality: The politicization and securitization of the discourse of immigration in Europe. New Political Science, 26(1), 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (2016). Populism and Digital Democracy. Berggruen Insights 6 (10/2016). Available from http://insights.berggruen.org/issues/issue-6/institute_posts/156 [last accessed May 22, 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford, UK: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., & Esaiasson, P. 2013. The immigration issue and anti-immigrant party success in Sweden 1970–2006: A deviant case analysis. Party Politics, 19(2), 343–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demker, M. (2015). “Mobilisering kring migration förändrar det Svenska partisystemet.” In B. Johansson, M. Oskarson, H. Oscarsson, & A. Bergström (Eds.) Fragment: SOM-undersökningen 2014. Göteborg, Sweden: SOM-institutet.
   Google Scholar
• Demker, M., & van der Meiden, S. (2015). Flyktningopinionen i Västsverige. In A. Bergström& J. Ohlsson (Eds.). Alla dessa val (SOM 64). Gothenburg, Sweden: Göteborgs Universitet/SOM-institutet, 177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Eger, M. A. (2010). Even in Sweden: The effect of immigration on support for welfare state spending. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 203–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastmond, M., & Ascher, H. (2011). In the best interest of the child? The politics of vulnerability and negotiations for asylum in Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(8), 1185–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, M. (2014). The dark side of online activism: Swedish right-wing extremist video activism on YouTube. Mediekultur, 30(56), 79–99.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M. (2016). Press conferences. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.) The international encyclopaedia of political communication (pp. 1226–1231). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (Eds.). (2014). Mediatization of politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., & Krogstrup, J. (2008). Immigration as a political issue in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Political Research, 47, 610–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinnfors, J., Spehar, A., & Bucken-Knapp, G. (2012). The missing factor: Why social democracy can lead to restrictive immigration policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 585–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, E. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Reexamining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (Eds.). (2010). The making of a European public sphere. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2010). The discursive construction of European identities. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2012). Right-Wing Populism, opportunism and political catholicism: On recent rhetorics and political communication of Polish PiS (Law and Justice) Party. In A. Pelinka & B. Haller (Eds.) Populismus: Herausforderung oder Gefahr für die Demokratie? (pp. 111–126. Vienna, Austria: New Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2013a). Policy, policy communication and discursive shifts: Analyzing EU policy discourses on climate change. In P. Cap & U. Okulska (Eds.), Analysing new genres in political communication (pp. 101–135). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2013b). From anti-immigration and nationalist revisionism to Islamophobia: Continuities and shifts in recent discourses and patterns of political communication of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ). In R. Wodak, B. Mral, M. KhosraviNik (Eds.), Rightwing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse, (pp. 135–148). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2014). Values, imaginaries and templates of journalistic practice: A critical discourse analysis. Social Semiotics, 24(3), 345–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2016). Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies. Discourse and Society, 27(3), 308–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., & Ledin, P. (2017). Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics 16:4, in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2019). Language and Politics: Interdisicplpinary Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., & Tucker, J. A. (Eds.). (2017). Re-/Constructing politics through social and online media: Ideologies, discourses and mediated political practices. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The politics of exclusion: Debating migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Lindvall, J., & Rothstein, B. (2006). Sweden: The fall of the strong state. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(1), 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). Mediatisation of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, B. M. (2005). Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odmalm, P. (2011). Political Parties and “the Immigration Issue”: Issue ownership in Swedish parliamentary elections 1991–2010, west European politics, 34(5), 1070–1091
   Google Scholar
• Oja, S., & Mral, B. (2013). The Sweden Democrats came in from the cold: How the debate allowing the SD into media arenas shifted between 2002 and 2010 In R. Wodak et al. (Eds.) Right wing populism in Europe (pp. 277–292). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Östberg, K., & Andersson, J. (2013). Sveriges Historia 1965–2012. Stockholm, Sweden: Nohrstedt.
   Google Scholar
• Pred, A. (2000). Even in Sweden. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrmination. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruzza, C. (2009). Populism and Euroscepticism: Towards uncivil society? Policy and Society, 28, 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Rydgren, J. (2005), Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family. European Journal of Political Research, 44, 413–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren, J. (2006). From tax populism to ethnic nationalism: Radical right-wing populism in Sweden. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rydgren, J. (2008) Immigration sceptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six West European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 47, 737–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren, J., & van der Meiden, S. (2016). Sweden, now a country like all the others? The radical right and the end of Swedish exceptionalism (Working Paper 25, Sociology Dept./Stockholm University). Retrieved from http://www.jensrydgren.com/WP25.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, D. (2006). Immigrants social rights in comparative perspective. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannerstedt, A. (2015). Hur extrema är Sverigedemokraterna? In A. Bergström et al. (Eds.), Fragment (pp. 399–414). Gothenburg, Sweden: Göteborgs Universitet/SOM-institutet.
   Google Scholar
• Schierup, C.-U., & Ålund, A. (2011). The end of Swedish exceptionalism? citizenship, neoliberalism and the politics of exclusion. Race and Class, 53(1), 45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, L. (2000). A comparative analysis of the asylum policy of seven European governments. Journal of Refugee Studies, 13(1), 118–132.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. (2013). Digital politics in Western democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse and Communication, 1(1), 91–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimising immigration control. A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118.
   Google Scholar
• Widfeldt, A. (2015). Tensions beneath the surface—The Swedish mainstream parties and the immigration issue. Acta Politica, 50(4), 399–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–95). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015) The politics of fear—What right-wing populist discourses mean. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar