References
- Alba, R., & Foner, N. (2017). Immigration and the geography of polarization. City & Community, 16(3), 239–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12241
- Araújo, R., de, C. R., Bobowik, M., Vilar, R., Liu, J. H., Gil de Zuñiga, H., Kus, L., Lebedeva, N., & Gouveia, V. V. (2020). Human values and ideological beliefs as predictors of attitudes towards immigrants across 20 countries: The country‐level moderating role of threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 534–546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2635
- Bahna, M., & Klobucký, R. (2015). Slovenská verejnosť a utečenci v decembri 2015. Tlačová správa Sociologického ústavu SAV, 21.12.2015. Sociologický ústav SAV. http://www.sociologia.sav.sk/cms/uploaded/2297_attach_tlacova_sprava_SU_SAV21122015.pdf
- Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2016). How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers. Science (New York, N.Y.), 354(6309), 217–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2147
- Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 309–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102651
- Clayton, K., Ferwerda, J., & Horiuchi, Y. (2019). Exposure to immigration and admission preferences: Evidence from France. Political Behavior.
- Cowling, M. M., Anderson, J. R., & Ferguson, R. (2019). Prejudice-relevant correlates of attitudes towards refugees: A meta-analysis. Journal of Refugee Studies, 32(3), 502–524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fey062
- Czymara, C. S. (2020). Attitudes toward refugees in contemporary Europe: A longitudinal perspective on cross-national differences. Social Forces. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa055
- Denney, S., & Green, C. (2021). Who should be admitted? Conjoint analysis of South Korean attitudes toward immigrants. Ethnicities, 21(1), 120–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796820916609
- Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as experimental participants. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 41–57). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452.004
- Espinosa, J. A., & Ortinau, D. J. (2016). Debunking legendary beliefs about student samples in marketing research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3149–3158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.003
- European Commission, Directorate-General Communication, & TNS Opinion & Social (2018). The views of Europeans on the European Union’s priorities: Report.
- Flores, R. D., & Schachter, A. (2018). Who are the “illegals”? The social construction of illegality in the United States. American Sociological Review, 83(5), 839–868. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418794635
- Ford, R. (2011). Acceptable and unacceptable immigrants: How opposition to immigration in Britain is affected by migrants’ region of origin. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(7), 1017–1037. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2011.572423
- Ford, R., & Mellon, J. (2020). The skills premium and the ethnic premium: A cross-national experiment on European attitudes to immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(3), 512–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550148
- Hager, A., & Veit, S. (2019). Attitudes toward asylum seekers: Evidence from Germany. Public Opinion Quarterly, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz023
- Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2015). Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(8), 2395–2400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416587112
- Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2014). Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 225–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818
- Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2015). The hidden American immigration consensus: A conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 529–548. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12138
- Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024
- Hanel, P. H. P., & Vione, K. C. (2016). Do student samples provide an accurate estimate of the general public? PLOS One, 11(12), e0168354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168354
- Hellwig, T., & Sinno, A. (2017). Different groups, different threats: Public attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1202749
- International Organization for Migration (2015, January 30). Slovakia. International Organization for Migration. https://www.iom.int/countries/slovakia
- International Organization for Migration (2019). Migrácia na Slovensku. Medzinárodná organizácia pre migráciu (IOM) Slovensko. https://www.iom.sk/sk/migracia/migracia-na-slovensku.html
- Ji, T., Tybur, J. M., & van Vugt, M. (2021). Gendered outgroup prejudice: An evolutionary threat management perspective on anti-immigrant bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219882489
- Jones, S., & Rutland, A. (2018). Attitudes toward immigrants among the youth: Contact interventions to reduce prejudice in the school context. European Psychologist, 23(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000310
- Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
- Kissová, L. (2018). The production of (un)deserving and (un)acceptable: Shifting representations of migrants within political discourse in Slovakia. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures, 32(4), 743–766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325417745127
- Koos, S., & Seibel, V. (2019). Solidarity with refugees across Europe. European Societies, 21(5), 704–728. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2019.1616794
- Leeper, T. J., Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2020). Measuring subgroup preferences in conjoint experiments. Political Analysis, 28(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.30
- Lenč, J. (2017). Unwelcome foreigners: Muslims in Slovakia. In A. Bilá (Ed.), Muslims are: Challenging stereotypes, changing perceptions (pp. 78–91). Nadácia otvorenej spoločnosti.
- Mascini, P., & Bochove, M. V. (2009). Gender stereotyping in the Dutch asylum procedure: “Independent” men versus “dependent” women. International Migration Review, 43(1), 112–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-9183.2008.01149.x
- Matera, C., Picchiarini, A., Olsson, M., & Brown, R. (2020). Does religion matter? Italians’ responses towards Muslim and Christian Arab immigrants as a function of their acculturation preferences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 75, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.12.002
- Maxwell, R. (2019). Cosmopolitan immigration attitudes in large European cities: Contextual or compositional effects? American Political Science Review, 113(2), 456–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000898
- McLaren, L., & Paterson, I. (2020). Generational change and attitudes to immigration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(3), 665–682. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550170
- Mesežnikov, G., & Bútorová, Z. (2018). Refugee crisis in Europe: Public opinion, state institutions and party politics in Slovakia. In J. Kucharczyk & G. Mesežnikov (Eds.), Phantom menace. The politics and policies of migration in Central Europe (pp. 53–81). Institute for Public Affairs. http://www.ivo.sk/buxus/docs//publikacie/subory/Phantom_Menace_The_Politics_and_Policies_of_Migration_in_Central_Europe.pdf
- Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky (2019). Štatistiky. Azyl a migrácia. Ministerstvo Vnútra Slovenskej Republiky. https://www.minv.sk/?statistiky-20
- Nassar, R. (2020). Framing refugees: The impact of religious frames on U.S. partisans and consumers of cable news media. Political Communication, 37(5), 593–611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723753
- Newman, B. J., Hartman, T. K., Lown, P. L., & Feldman, S. (2015). Easing the heavy hand: Humanitarian concern, empathy, and opinion on immigration. British Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 583–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000410
- Olsson, M., Matera, C., Tip, L. K., & Brown, R. (2019). The double-edged effect of intergroup similarity: Muslim and Christian immigrants’ acculturation preferences on intergroup relations in Sweden. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(4), 478–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217740432
- Orme, B. K. (2014). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research (3rd ed.). Research Publishers.
- O'Rourke, K. H., & Sinnott, R. (2006). The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(4), 838–861. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.10.005
- Rucker, J. M., Murphy, M. C., & Quintanilla, V. D. (2019). The immigrant labeling effect: The role of immigrant group labels in prejudice against noncitizens. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218818744
- Samuels, G. (2016, December 1). Slovakia bars Islam from becoming state religion. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/slovakia-bars-islam-state-religion-tightening-church-laws-robert-fico-a7449646.html
- Schachter, A. (2016). From “different” to “similar”: An experimental approach to understanding assimilation. American Sociological Review, 81(5), 981–1013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416659248
- Schlueter, E., Masso, A., & Davidov, E. (2020). What factors explain anti-Muslim prejudice? An assessment of the effects of Muslim population size, institutional characteristics and immigration-related media claims. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(3), 649–664. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550160
- Schlueter, E., Meuleman, B., & Davidov, E. (2013). Immigrant integration policies and perceived group threat: A multilevel study of 27 Western and Eastern European countries. Social Science Research, 42(3), 670–682. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.001
- Sobolewska, M., Galandini, S., & Lessard-Phillips, L. (2017). The public view of immigrant integration: Multidimensional and consensual. Evidence from survey experiments in the UK and the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1248377
- Strabac, Z., Aalberg, T., & Valenta, M. (2014). Attitudes towards Muslim immigrants: Evidence from survey experiments across four countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.831542
- Strabac, Z., & Listhaug, O. (2008). Anti-Muslim prejudice in Europe: A multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries. Social Science Research, 37(1), 268–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.02.004
- Strezhnev, A. (2019). Conjoint Survey Design Tool: A Python tool for designing and exporting conjoint survey experiments [Python]. https://github.com/astrezhnev/conjointsdt (Original work published 2017).
- Turper, S., Iyengar, S., Aarts, K., & van Gerven, M. (2015). Who is less welcome?: The impact of individuating cues on attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.912941
- Úrad hraničnej a cudzineckej polície (2018). Štatistický prehľad legálnej a nelegálnej migrácie v Slovenskej republike za rok 2018. Prezídium Policajného zboru. https://www.minv.sk/swift_data/source/policia/hranicna_a_cudzinecka_policia/rocenky/rok_2018/2018-rocenka-UHCP-SK.pdf
- Úrad hraničnej a cudzineckej polície (2019). Štatistický prehľad legálnej a nelegálnej migrácie v Slovenskej republike za 1. polrok 2019. Prezídium Policajného zboru. https://www.minv.sk/swift_data/source/policia/hranicna_a_cudzinecka_policia/rocenky/rok_2019/2019-I.polrok-UHCP-SK.pdf
- Valentino, N. A., Soroka, S. N., Iyengar, S., Aalberg, T., Duch, R., Fraile, M., Hahn, K. S., Hansen, K. M., Harell, A., Helbling, M., Jackman, S. D., & Kobayashi, T. (2019). Economic and cultural drivers of immigrant support worldwide. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1201–1226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341700031X
- Ward, D. G. (2019). Public attitudes toward young immigrant men. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 264–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000710
- Weiss, A., & Tulin, M. (2019). Does mentoring make immigrants more desirable? A conjoint analysis. Migration Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz042
- Wright, M., Levy, M., & Citrin, J. (2016). Public attitudes toward immigration policy across the legal/illegal divide: The role of categorical and attribute-based decision-making. Political Behavior, 38(1), 229–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9311-y