1,110
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Detention Decisions: Implementation Rationales of the Bureaucratic Use of Immigration Detention in Swiss Cantons

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Achermann, C. (2021). Shaping migration at the border: the entangled rationalities of border control practices. Comparative Migration Studies, 9(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00214-0
  • Achermann, C., Bertrand, A.-L., Miaz, J., & Rezzonico, R. (2019). Administrative Detention of Foreign Nationals in Figures. Policy Briefs « in a Nutshell », #12, https://nccr-onthemove.ch/wp_live14/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Policy-Brief-nccr-on-the-move-12-Achermann-EN-Web.pdf.
  • Aliverti, A. (2012). Exploring the function of criminal law in the policing of foreigners: The decision to prosecute immigration-related offences. Social & Legal Studies, 21(4), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663912455447
  • Ashworth, A., & Zedner, L. (2014). Preventive justice (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Ataç, I. (2019). Deserving shelter: Conditional access to accommodation for rejected asylum seekers in Austria, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 17(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2018.1530401
  • Borrelli, L., Kurt, S., Achermann, C., & Pfirter, L. (2021). (Un)Conditional Welfare? Tensions Between Welfare Rights and Migration Control in Swiss Case Law. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2021-0008
  • Bosworth, M. (2014). Inside immigration detention (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Bosworth, M. (2019). Immigration detention, punishment and the transformation of justice. Social & Legal Studies, 28(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663917747341
  • Brandariz, J. A., & Fernández-Bessa, C. (2021). Coronavirus and immigration detention in Europe: The short summer of abolitionism? Social Sciences, 10(6), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10060226
  • Brodkin, E. Z. (2013). Street-Level organizations and the welfare state. In E. Z. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds.), Work and the welfare state. Street-Level organizations and workfare politics (pp. 17–34). Georgetown University Press.
  • Campesi, G. (2020). Genealogies of immigration detention: Migration control and the shifting boundaries between the ‘penal’ and the ‘preventive’ state. Social & Legal Studies, 29(4), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919888275
  • Campesi, G., & Fabini, G. (2020). Immigration detention as social defence: Policing ‘dangerous mobility’ in Italy. Theoretical Criminology, 24(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619859350
  • Dubois, V. (2014). The state, legal rigor, and the poor: The daily practice of welfare control. Social Analysis, 58(3), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2014.580304
  • Evans, T., & Hupe, P. (2020). Discretion and the quest for controlled freedom. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Flynn, M., & Cannon, C. (2011). Immigration detention in Switzerland. A global detention project special report (pp. 1–44). Global Detention Project.
  • Griffiths, M. (2013). Living with uncertainty: Indefinite immigration detention. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 1(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2013.010301
  • Guggisberg, J., Abrassart, A., & Bischof, S. (2017). Administrativhaft im Asylbereich: Mandat “Quantitative Datenanalysen”. Schlussbericht zuhanden Parlamentarische Verwaltungskontrolle. Büro für arbeits- und sozialpolitische Studien (BASS).
  • Kalir, B. (2019). Repressive compassion: Deportation caseworkers furnishing an emotional comfort zone in encounters with illegalized migrants. Political and Legal Anthropology Review: Polar, 42(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12281
  • Leerkes, A., & Broeders, D. (2010). A case of mixed motives?: Formal and informal functions of administrative immigration detention. British Journal of Criminology, 50(5), 830–850. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq035
  • Leerkes, A., & Van Houte, M. (2020). Beyond the deportation regime: Differential state interests and capacities in dealing with (non-) deportability in Europe. Citizenship Studies, 24(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1718349
  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th anniversary ed.n). Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Majcher, I., & De Senarclens, C. (2014). Discipline and punish? Analysis of the purposes of immigration detention in Europe. AmeriQuests, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.15695/amqst.v11i2.3964
  • Miaz, J. (2017). From the law to the decision: The social and legal conditions of asylum adjudication in Switzerland. European Policy Analysis, 3(2), 372–396.
  • Miaz, J. (2019). Entre examen individuel et gestion collective : ce que les injonctions à la productivité font à l’instruction des demandes d’asile. Lien Social et Politiques, 83, 144–166.
  • Miaz, J., & Achermann, C. (2021). Bureaucracies under judicial control? Relational discretion in the implementation of immigration detention in Swiss cantons. Administration & Society, Online First, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211038000
  • Portillo, S., & Rudes, D. S. (2014). Construction of justice at the street level. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10(1), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134046
  • Rezzonico, L. (2020). Reproducing boundaries while enforcing borders. Migration Letters, 17(4), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i4.692
  • Ryo, E. (2016). Detained: A study of immigration bond hearings. Law & Society Review, 50(1), 117–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12177
  • Vallbé, J., González‐Beilfuss, M., & Kalir, B. (2019). Across the sloping meadow floor: An empirical analysis of preremoval detention of noncitizens. Law & Society Review, 53(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12413
  • Varsanyi, M. (Ed.). (2010). Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in U.S. cities and states. Stanford University Press.
  • Weber, L. (2003). Down that wrong road: Discretion in decisions to detain asylum seekers arriving at UK ports. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(3), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2311.00281