160
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letters in Response

Response to Comment on Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask

, ORCID Icon, , &
Page 769 | Received 08 Jan 2021, Accepted 13 Jan 2021, Published online: 08 Feb 2021

References

  • Jones PG, Kamona S, Doran O, et al. Randomized controlled trial of humidified high-flow nasal oxygen for acute respiratory distress in the emergency department: the HOT-ER *Study. Respir Care. 2016;61(3):291–299.
  • Hosseininejad SM, Aminiahidashti H, Goli Khatir I, et al. Carbon monoxide poisoning in Iran during 1999-2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;53:87–96. Epub 2017 Nov 28. PMID: 29220732.
  • Simonsen C, Thorsteinsson K, Mortensen RN, et al. Carbon monoxide poisoning in Denmark with focus on mortality and factors contributing to mortality. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210767.
  • Mattiuzzi C, Lippi G. Worldwide epidemiology of carbon monoxide poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2020;39(4):387–392. Epub 2019 Dec 1. PMID: 31789062.
  • Yesiloglu O, Gulen M, Satar S, et al. Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask. Clin Toxicol. 2020;1–6 [ahead of print].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.