References
- Calderbank A. The bipyridylium herbicides. Adv Pest Control Res. 1968;8:127–235.
- World Health Organization. Environmental health criteria # 39. Paraquat and diquat. Geneva: IPCS Inchem, WHO; 1984.
- Brown R, Clapp M, Dyson J, et al. Paraquat in perspective. Outlook Pest Man. 2004;15(6):259–267.
- Lock EA, Wilks MF. Paraquat. In: Krieger R, editor. Hayes’ handbook of pesticide toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier; 2010. p. 1771–1827.
- World Health Organization. The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification. 2019 ed. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
- Bullivant CM. Accidental poisoning by paraquat: report of two cases in man. Br Med J. 1966;1(5498):1272–1273.
- Campbell S. Death from paraquat in a child. Lancet. 1968;291(7534):144.
- Revkin AC. Paraquat - a potent weedkiller is killing people. Sci Digest. 1983;36–38(42):100–104.
- Eddleston M. Patterns and problems of deliberate self-poisoning in the developing world. QJM. 2000;93(11):715–731.
- Huang J, Xuan D, Li X, et al. The value of APACHE II in predicting mortality after paraquat poisoning in Chinese and Korean population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(30):e6838.
- Buckley NA, Fahim M, Raubenheimer J, et al. Case fatality of agricultural pesticides after self-poisoning in Sri Lanka: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(6):e854–e862.
- World Health Organization. Poison information monograph 399. Paraquat. Geneva: IPCS Inchem, WHO; 1989.
- Dawson AH, Eddleston M, Senarathna L, et al. Acute human lethal toxicity of agricultural pesticides: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2010;7(10):e1000357.
- Gawarammana IB, Buckley NA. Medical management of paraquat ingestion. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72(5):745–757.
- Meredith TJ, Vale JA. Treatment of paraquat poisoning in man: methods to prevent absorption. Hum Toxicol. 1987;6(1):49–55.
- Slade P. Emetic formulation of paraquat: proposed strategy for introduction worldwide. EDC paper no 729. Haslemere, Surrey (UK): ICI Ltd; 1976. p. 391–418.
- Slade P. Paraquat: policy on inclusion of emetic (draft). ICI Agrochemicals; 1983. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from:https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1983.03.05-ICI-Draft-Paraquat-Policy-on-Inclusion-of-Emetic-SYNG-PQ-02451028_R.pdf.
- Syngenta AG. The evolution of medical opinion on the use of emetics. Basel: Syngenta; 2021. [cited 2022 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.syngenta.com/sites/syngenta/files/docs/the-evolution-of-medical-opinion-on-the-use-of-emetics.pdf
- Food and Agricultural Organization. FAO specifications and evaluations for agricultural pesticides. Paraquat dichloride. Rome: FAO; 1996.
- Food and Agricultural Organization. FAO specifications and evaluations for agricultural pesticides. Paraquat dichloride. Rome: FAO; 2008. [cited 2021 Apr 4]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/Specs/Paraquat08.pdf.
- Food and Agricultural Organization. FAO specifications and evaluations for agricultural pesticides. Paraquat dichloride. Rome: FAO; 2021. [cited 2022 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/ca9629en/ca9629en.pdf.
- Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority. Standard for paraquat dichloride technical concentrate active constituent. Caberra: Australian Government; 2011. [updated 2021; cited 2022 Jan 6]. Available from: https://apvma.gov.au/node/2594
- Food and Agricultural Organization. FAO specifications and evaluations for agricultural pesticides. Diquat dibromide. Rome: FAO; 2008. [cited 2022 Jan 61]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/ca9591en/ca9591en.pdf
- Slade P. Letter to Nils Ospenson, Chevron Chemical Company. Haslemere Surrey (UK): ICI Ltd; 1976. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1976.11.03-ICI-to-CCC-re-global-policy-decisions-on-emetic-formulation-CUSA-00088288-at-8290-8291.pdf.
- Bero L. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:267–288.
- Collin J, Lee K, Gilmore AB. Unlocking the corporate documents of British American Tobacco: an invaluable global resource needs radically improved access. Lancet. 2004;363(9423):1746–1747.
- Barlow P, Serôdio P, Ruskin G, et al. Science organisations and Coca-Cola’s 'war' with the public health community: insights from an internal industry document. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(9):761–763.
- Noguchi N, Misawa S, Tsuchiya S, et al. Cardio-respiratory effects of paraquat with and without emetics on Wistar rats. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1985;27(6):508–510.
- Frelon JH, Merigot P, Garnier R[, et al. Prognostic factors in acute paraquat poisoning. A retrospective study of cases registered by the Poison Control Center of Paris in 1981. Toxicol Eur Res. 1983;5(4):163–169.
- Heylings JR, Farnworth MJ, Swain CM, et al. Identification of an alginate-based formulation of paraquat to reduce the exposure of the herbicide following oral ingestion. Toxicology. 2007;241(1–2):1–10.
- Wilks MF, Fernando R, Ariyananda PL, et al. Improvement in survival after paraquat ingestion following introduction of a new formulation in Sri Lanka. PLoS Med. 2008;5(2):e49.
- Wilks MF, Tomenson JA, Fernando R, et al. Formulation changes and time trends in outcome following paraquat ingestion in Sri Lanka. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011;49(1):21–28.
- Kawai M, Koyama M, Kaneko Y, et al. The effects of administration of an emetic on paraquat toxicity. J J R M. 1983;32(4):887–892.
- Protzel A. Paraquat: toxicokinetics in dogs. Washington (DC): US EPA; 2005. [cited 2022 Jan 71]. Available from: https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/chemicalsearch/chemical/foia/web/pdf/061601/061601-2005-07-29a.pdf.
- Bateman DN. New formulation of paraquat: a step forward but in the wrong direction. PLoS Med. 2008;5(2):e58.
- Onyon LJ, Volans GN. The epidemiology and prevention of paraquat poisoning. Hum Toxicol. 1987;6(1):19–29.
- Bayliss PFC. A summary of clinical results of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor ICI 63,197 in a variety of disease states. Alderley Park (UK): ICI Pharmaceuticals Division; 1973. [cited 2021 Apr 8]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1973.07.23-ICI-rpt-PH20992-Summary-of-clinical-results-of-PDE-inhibitor-63197-SYNG-PQ-14420786_R.pdf.
- Rose MS. The concentration of PP796 required to produce emesis in experimental animals and an estimation of the emetic dose in man. CTL/R/390(R). Macclesfield: Central Toxicology Laboratory, ICI Agrochemicals; 1976. revised 1977. [cited 2022 Feb 13]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1977.02.xx-ICI-rpt-CTL-R-390R-Concentration-of-PP796-required-to-produce-emesis-SYNG-PQ-00524793.pdf.
- Wiseman RD. An emetic formulation of ‘Gramoxone’. Haslemere (UK): ICI Plant Protection Division; 1976. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1976.10.06-ICI-memo-An-emetic-formulation-of-Gramoxone-SYNG-PQ-02450673_R.pdf.
- Travis KZ. A new analysis of the human emetic dose-response to PP796 based on clinical data for dosing of PP796 only. Jealott’s Hill (UK): Syngenta Ltd; 2019. [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2019.04.12-SYN-Travis-new-dose-response-analysis-of-clinical-data-SYNG-PQ-29299971.pdf.
- HRC. The acute oral toxicity and mode of action of emetic PP796 in cynomolgus monkeys, and its effect upon the oral toxicity of several formulations of paraquat. HRC Report No. IC I 119/78556. Huntingdon (UK): HRC; 1979. [cited 2022 Jan 10]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1979.03.19-ICI-HRC-rpt-Acute-oral-tox-and-MOA-of-PP796-in-monkeys-effect-on-tox-of-PQ-SYNG-PQ-30880010.pdf.
- HRC. The toxicity of orally administered emetic PP796 in cynomolgus monkeys. HRC Report No ICI 171/78627. Huntingdon (UK): HRC; 1978. [cited 2022 Jan 10]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1978.11.08-ICI-HRC-rpt-Toxicity-of-orally-admin-PP796-in-cymologous-monkeys-SYNG-PQ-00527245.pdf
- Robinson M, Brammer A. PP796: emetic study in paraquat treated dogs. CTL/T/2471. Alderley Park (UK): ICI Plc Central Toxicology Laboratory; 1985. [cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1995.04.19-ZEN-PQ-EEC-Review-Appendix-A-the-Emetic-PP796-SYNG-PQ-04262278_R-at-2282-2295-1.pdf
- Smith LL. Memo regarding concentration of PP796 in Gramoxone 04 Dec 1985. Ref LLS/SAB/146. Alderley Park (UK): Cheshire Central Toxicology Laboratory, ICI Plc; 1985.
- Heylings JR. Memo: French formulation of paraquat. Macclesfield (UK): ICI CTL; 1990. [cited 2022 Jan 20]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1987.03.30-1991.02.73-ICI-Paraquat-Safer-Formulations-file-SYNG-PQ-03709681_R.pdf
- Heylings JR, Smith LL. Toxicology of multiple emulsion formulations of paraquat. Alderley Park (UK): ICI Central Toxicology Laboratory; 1990. [cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1990.02.19-ICI-Heylings-Smith-Toxicology-of-multiple-emulsion-formulations-of-PQ-SYNG-PQ-03709681_R-at-9742-9762.pdf.
- Shaunak R. Safer paraquat - a summary. Yalding (UK): Zeneca Agrochemicals; 1996. [cited 2022 Feb 13]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1996.05.29-Safer-paraquat-A-summary-SYNG-PQ-14416846_R.pdf
- Heylings JR. Memo: formulation additives and gastrointestinal toxicity 01 Jul 1991. Ref GI001/LCM. Alderley Park (UK): ICI Central Toxicology Laboratory; 1991. [cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from:https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1990.02.19-ICI-Heylings-Smith-Toxicology-of-multiple-emulsion-formulations-of-PQ-SYNG-PQ-03709681_R-at-9742-9762.pdf
- Anon. Summary of the development of Magnoxone. Haslemere, Surrey (UK): Clinical Toxicology Laboratory, ICI Plc; 1993. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1993.11.01-ZEN-Summary-of-development-of-magnoxone-SYNG-PQ-02768710-.pdf
- Elliott B, Clapp M. Gramoxone Inteon and improved safety. Haslemere, Surrey (UK): Syngenta; 2006. [cited 2022 Jan 19]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2006.05.31-SYN-Gramoxone-Inteon-and-improved-safety-SYNG-PQ-22611082-.pdf
- Environmental Protection Agency. 2-amino-4,5-dihydro-6-methyl-4-propyls-triazolo(1,5-alpha)pyrimidin-5-one (PP796); notice of filing a pesticide petition to amend the existing tolerance exemption. Fed Regist. 2005;70:37847–37851.
- Brammer A, Robinson M. PP796: emetic dose response study in dogs. CTL/T/2459. Alderley Park (UK): ICI Plc Central Toxicology Laboratory; 1985. [cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1995.04.19-ZEN-PQ-EEC-Review-Appendix-A-the-Emetic-PP796-SYNG-PQ-04262278_R-at-2282-2295-1.pdf.
- Howard JK. Paraquat poisoning in Western Samoa, 1977–78. A preliminary assessment of the effect of PP796; 1978. [cited 2022 06/01]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1978.09.30-ICI-rpt-PQ-poisonings-in-Western-Samoa-1977-78-preliminary-assessment-of-effect-of-PP796-SYNG-PQ-04263349_R.pdf.
- Bismuth C, Garnier R, Dally S, et al. Prognosis and treatment of paraquat poisoning: a review of 28 cases. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1982;19(5):461–474.
- Bramley A, Hart TB. Paraquat poisoning in the United Kingdom (abstract). Human Toxicol. 1983;2:417.
- Denduyts-Whitehead AP, Hart TB, Volans GN. Effects of the addition of an emetic to paraquat formulations on acute poisoning in man (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1985;23:422–423.
- Johnen BG. Memo: concerning the concentration of the emetic PP796 in liquid paraquat formulations. Haslemere (UK): Zeneca Agrochemicals; 1994. [cited 2022 Jan 21]. Available from https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1995.01.23-ZEN-Memo-re-emetic-concentrations-in-liquid-paraquat-formulations-SYNG-PQ-33966318_R-1.pdf.
- French DA. Paraquat and PP796. Basel: Syngenta; 2019. [cited 2022 Feb 24]. Available from https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2019.05.01-SYN-French-to-Heylings-may-be-draft-SYNG-PQ-25596243-.pdf.
- Bramley A, Hart TB. Paraquat poisoning in the United Kingdom (internal report). Fernhurst (UK): Plant Protection Division, ICI Ltd; 1982. [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1982.06.xx-ICI-rpt-Bramley-Hart-PQ-poisonings-in-the-UK-SYNG-PQ-03720006_R.pdf.
- Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet. 2002;359(9302):248–252.
- Imperial Chemical Industries PLC. ‘Gramoxone’ poisoning in the UK 1980–1988 and the role of the emetic. Fernhurst (UK): ICI; 1992. [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1992.10.31-ICI-rpt-Gramoxone-poisoning-in-the-UK-1980-1988-and-role-of-emetic-CHEV-SJ0014644-.pdf.
- Moon JM, Chun BJ. Acute intoxication with the adjuvant itself for gramoxone INTEON. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012;31(1):18–23.
- Ko DR, Chung SP, You JS, et al. Effects of paraquat ban on herbicide poisoning-related mortality. Yonsei Med J. 2017;58(4):859–866.
- European Medicines Agency. Statistical principles for clinical trials. CPMP/ICH/363/96. London: EMA; 1998. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-e-9-statistical-principles-clinical-trials-step-5_en.pdf.
- DeMets DL. Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials. J Intern Med. 2004;255(5):529–537.
- European Medicines Agency. ICH Topic E 4. Dose response information to support drug registration. CPMP/ICH/378/95. London: EMA; 1994. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-e-4-dose-response-information-support-drug-registration-step-5_en.pdf.
- Hart TB. Memo: the addition of emetic (PP796) to paraquat formulations. Haslemere (UK): ICI Plant Protection Division; 1984. p. 370–381. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1995.04.19-ZEN-PQ-EEC-Review-Appendix-A-the-Emetic-PP796-SYNG-PQ-04262278_R-at-2282-2295-1.pdf
- Paraquat Strategic Action Committee. Memo: increased emetic content for paraquat formulations. ICI Agrochemicals; 1987. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1987.12.31-ICI-Memo-re-CTL-recommendation-Increased-Emetic-Content-for-PQ-Formulations-SYNG-PQ-02451232_R.pdf.
- Heylings JR. Human data with the paraquat emetic (PP796). Macclesfield (UK): ICI Central Toxicology Laboratory; 1990. p. 345–346. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1976.10.xx-ICI-rpt-Emetic-formulation-proposed-strategy-for-intro-worldwide-SYNG-PQ-04262278_R-at-2668-2695.pdf
- Anon. Draft discussion - Jon Heylings. Unstated: Syngenta; 2019. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2019.04.09-SYN-Draft-dossier-re-Heylings-SYNG-PQ-23675404-.pdf
- Schein PS, Davis RD, Carter S, et al. The evaluation of anticancer drugs in dogs and monkeys for the prediction of qualitative toxicities in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1970;11(1):3–40.
- Holmes AM, Rudd JA, Tattersall FD, et al. Opportunities for the replacement of animals in the study of nausea and vomiting. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157(6):865–880.
- Kararli TT. Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1995;16(5):351–380.
- Daly MJ, Humphray JM, Stables R. Inhibition of gastric acid secretion in the dog by the H2-receptor antagonists, ranitidine, cimetidine, and metiamide. Gut. 1980;21(5):408–412.
- Anon. Paraquat alternative formulations. Haslemere, Surrey (UK): ICI; 1987. [cited 2022 Jun 24]. Available from: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20521590-1987-memo-on-paraquat-alternative-formulations
- Hawton K, Cole D, O’Grady J, et al. Motivational aspects of deliberate self-poisoning in adolescents. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;141:286–291.
- Hawton K, van Heeringen K, editors. The international handbook of suicide and attempted suicide. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
- Hawton K. Suicide and attempted suicide among children and adolescents. 0 ed. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications, Inc; 1986.
- Carroll R, Metcalfe C, Gunnell D. Hospital presenting self-harm and risk of fatal and non-fatal repetition: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89944.
- Eddleston M, Gunnell D, Karunaratne A, et al. Epidemiology of intentional self-poisoning in rural Sri Lanka. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:583–584.
- Syngenta AG. Paraquat in the media. Addition of the emetic and its level – Jon Heylings’ allegations. Basel: Syngenta; 2021. [cited 2022 May 26]. Available from: https://www.syngenta.com/en/paraquat-in-the-media.
- Gupta S, Ahlawat SK. Aluminium phosphide poisoning - a review. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1995;33(1):19–24.
- Singh S, Singh D, Wig N, et al. Aluminium phosphide ingestion - a clinicopathological study. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1996;34(6):703–706.
- Hart TB. Letter to Dr HAFM Custers. Haslemere (UK): ICI Plant Protection Division; 1982. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1982.06.07-ICI-Hart-to-Custers-at-BV-Luxan-Netherlands-comments-on-report-Paraquat-and-the-Addition-of-an-Emetic-SYNG-PQ-03719883_R.pdf.
- Hoegberg LCG, Shepherd G, Wood DM, et al. Systematic review on the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination following acute oral overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021;59(12):1196–1227.
- Chen HH, Lin JL, Huang WH, et al. Spectrum of corrosive esophageal injury after intentional paraquat or glyphosate-surfactant herbicide ingestion. Int J Gen Med. 2013;6:677–683.
- Ackrill P, Hasleton PS, Ralston AJ. Oesophageal perforation due to paraquat. Br Med J. 1978;1(6122):1252–1253.
- Lee SY, Shin, JH, Lee WG. Paraquat poisoning. J Korean Pediatr Soc. 1987;30:891–900.
- James N, Bakshi R, Rudresh SS, et al. Pneumoperitoneum from pneumomediastinum in paraquat poisoning. Trop Doct. 2021;51(2):241–242.
- Chan KW, Cheong IK. Paraquat poisoning: a clinical and epidemiological review of 30 cases. Med J Malaysia. 1982;37(3):227–230.
- Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations WHO. Manual on development and use of FAO and WHO specifications for pesticides. 1 ed–3rd revision ed. Rome: FAO; 2016.