References
- Lavergne V, Nolin TD, Hoffman RS, et al. The EXTRIP (EXtracorporeal TReatments in poisoning) workgroup: guideline methodology. Clin Toxicol. 2012;50(5):403–413. doi:10.3109/15563650.2012.683436.
- Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines., graham R. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
- Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182(18):E839–842. doi:10.1503/cmaj.090449.
- Gosselin S, Morris M, Miller-Nesbitt A, et al. Methodology for AACT evidence-based recommendations on the use of intravenous lipid emulsion therapy in poisoning. Clin Toxicol. 2015;53(6):557–564. doi:10.3109/15563650.2015.1052498.
- Hoegberg LC, Bania TC, Lavergne V, et al. Systematic review of the effect of intravenous lipid emulsion therapy for local anesthetic toxicity. Clin Toxicol. 2016;54(3):167–193. doi:10.3109/15563650.2015.1121270.
- Levine M, Hoffman RS, Lavergne V, et al. Systematic review of the effect of intravenous lipid emulsion therapy for non-local anesthetics toxicity. Clin Toxicol. 2016;54(3):194–221. doi:10.3109/15563650.2015.1126286.
- Hayes BD, Gosselin S, Calello DP, et al. Systematic review of clinical adverse events reported after acute intravenous lipid emulsion administration. Clin Toxicol. 2016;54(5):365–404. doi:10.3109/15563650.2016.1151528.
- Grunbaum AM, Gilfix BM, Hoffman RS, et al. Review of the effect of intravenous lipid emulsion on laboratory analyses. Clin Toxicol. 2016;54(2):92–102. doi:10.3109/15563650.2015.1115515.
- Gosselin S, Hoegberg LC, Hoffman RS, et al. Evidence-based recommendations on the use of intravenous lipid emulsion therapy in poisoning. Clin Toxicol. 2016;54(10):899–923. doi:10.1080/15563650.2016.1214275.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):395–400. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012.
- Covvey JR, McClendon C, Gionfriddo MR. Back to the basics: guidance for formulating good research questions. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024;20(1):66–69. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.09.009.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence–study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407–415. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017.
- Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2001.
- Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):719–725. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013.
- Guyatt GH, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ, et al. Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE working group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;80:3–7. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.006.
- Venkatesh AK, Savage D, Sandefur B, et al. Systematic review of emergency medicine clinical practice guidelines: implications for research and policy. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178456. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178456.
- Vermeulen N, Le Clef N, Veleva Z, et al. European recommendations for good practice in addition to an evidence-based guidelines programme: rationale and method of development. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019;24(1):30–34. doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111032.
- Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. 2023 Guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2023;54(7):e314–e370. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000436.