Animals as sentinels of chemical terrorism agents: An evidence-based review

References

• Anonymous. Biological and chemical terrorism: Strategic plan for preparedness and response. Recommendations of the CDC Strategic Planning Workgroup. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2000; 49: 1–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burrell G, Seibert F. Experiments with small animals and carbon monoxide. The Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 1914; 6(3)241–4
   Google Scholar
• Wise JK, Heathcott BL, Shepherd AJ, Avma. Results of the 2002 AVMA survey of US pet-owning households regarding use of veterinary services and expenditures. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2003; 222(11)1524–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daszak P, Tabor GM, Kilpatrick AM, Epstein J, Plowright R. Conservation medicine and a new agenda for emerging diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2004; 1026: 1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paddle BM. Biosensors for chemical and biological agents of defence interest. Biosensors & Bioelectronics 1996; 11(11)1079–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biema DV. Prophet of poison. Time April 3, 1995; 27–33
   Google Scholar
• pubs.acs.org/cen/topstory/8110/notw3.html, Ember L. Chemical weapons: Chickens on alert in Kuwait. Chemical & Engineering News 2003; March 10:12.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2003/n03032003_200303034.html, American Forces Press Service. Defending against Iraqi chemical, biological threats, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/t03032003_t0303chembio.html, United States Department of Defense, 2003. Briefing on Chemical and Biological Defense Readiness March 03, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.epa.gov/scienceforum/PDFs/security/hatch_g.pdf, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Sentinels detection methods and chemical decontamination health risk key components of EPA's Safe Building Program.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell T, Morgan E. Animal surveillance in NBC defensive operations. J R Army Med Corps 2003; 149: 225–229
   Google Scholar
• Kales SN, Christiani DC. Acute chemical emergencies. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 800–808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Review of the U.S. Army's health risk assessments for oral exposure to six chemical-warfare agents. Introduction. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 2000; 59: 281–526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://www.canarydatabase.org, The Canary Database: Animals as Sentinels of Human Environmental Health Hazards
   Google Scholar
• Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, Bowman M. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature Am Fam Physician 2004; 69: 548–556
   Google Scholar
• http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp#levels, Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B. Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation. Oxford, UK: Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine; 2001
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council: Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2003; 3
   Google Scholar
• Boffey PM. 6000 sheep stricken near CBW center. Science 1968; 159: 1442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcroft J. The toxicity of atmospheres containing hydrocyanic acid gas. Journal of Hygiene 1931; 31: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koenig R. Environmental disasters. Wildlife deaths are a grim wake-up call in Eastern Europe. Science 2000; 287: 1737–1738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslani MR, Mohri M, Maleki M, Sharifi K, Mohammadi GR, Chamsaz M. Mass cyanide intoxication in sheep. Vet Hum Toxicol 2004; 46: 186–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fonnum F, Sterri SH. Factors modifying the toxicity of organophosphorous compounds including Soman and Sarin. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1981; 1: 143–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maxwell DM, Brecht KM, BL O'Neill. The effect of carboxylesterase inhibition on interspecies differences in soman toxicity. Toxicol Lett 1987; 39: 35–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellin RI. Anomalies in theories and therapy of intoxication by potent organophosphorus anticholinesterase compounds. Gen Pharm 1982; 13: 457–466
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leng G.L. J., Role of individual susceptibility in risk assessment of pesticide. Occup Environ Med 1999; 56: 449–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bide RW, Armour SJ, Yee E. GB toxicity reassessed using newer techniques for estimation of human toxicity from animal inhalation toxicity data: new method for estimating acute human toxicity (GB). J Appl Toxicol 2005; 25: 393–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton P. Upper airway irritation, odor perception and health risk due to airborne chemicals. Toxicol Lett 2003; 140–141; 239–248
   Google Scholar
• www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/VX/basics/facts.asp, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Facts about VX.
   Google Scholar
• www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/soman/basics/facts.asp, Facts about Soman. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor JA, Plunkett LM, Youngren SH, Manley A, Plunkett JB, Starr TB. Humans appear no more sensitive than laboratory animals to the inhibition of red blood cell cholinesterase by dichlorvos. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2005; 43: 150–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BW, Henderson JD, Spencer PS. Clinical effects of low-level exposures to chemical warfare agents in mice and chickens. Drug Chem Toxicol 1998; 21(Suppl 1)183–190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chilcott RP, Jenner J, Hotchkiss SA, Rice P. In vitro skin absorption and decontamination of sulphur mustard: comparison of human and pig-ear skin. J Appl Toxicol 2001; 21: 279–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick IP, Scott RC. The influence of different strains and age on in vitro rat skin permeability to water and mannitol. Pharm Res 1992; 9: 884–887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KJ, Casillas R, Graham J, Skelton HG, Stemler F, Hackley BE, Jr. Histopathologic features seen with different animal models following cutaneous sulfur mustard exposure. J Dermatol Sci 1997; 14: 126–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council : Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2002; 2
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council: Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2004; 4
   Google Scholar
• Karalliedde L, et al. Possible immediate and long-term health effects following exposure to chemical warfare agents. Public Health 2000; 114: 238–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa AB, Manzano H, Soto-Blanco B, Gorniak SL. Toxicokinetics of cyanide in rats, pigs and goats after oral dosing with potassium cyanide. Arch Toxicol 2003; 77: 330–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminlari M, Gilanpour H. Comparative studies on the distribution of rhodanese in different tissues of domestic animals. Comp Biochem Physiol 1991; 99B: 673–677
   Google Scholar
• O'Rourke K. National pet health surveillance system in the works. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 1335–1336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai MW K-SW, Rodgers GC, Abrams JY, Haber DA, Bronstein AC, Wruk KM. 2005. 2005 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers National Poisoning and Exposure Database. Clin Toxicol 2006; 44: 803–932
   Google Scholar