Front-Stage Stars and Backstage Producers: The Role of Judges in Problem-Solving Courts

REFERENCES

• Bean , P. 2002 . Drug treatment courts, British style: The drug treatment court movement in Britain . Substance Use & Misuse , 37 : 1595 – 1614 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman , G. 2000 . What's a traditional judge anyway? . Judicature , 84 ( 2 ) : 78 – 86 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman , G. and Feinblatt , J. 2001 . Problem-solving: A brief primer . Law & Policy , 23 ( 2 ) : 125 – 141 .
   Google Scholar
• Berman , G. and Feinblatt , J. 2005 . Good courts: The case for problem-solving justice , New York : New Press .
   Google Scholar
• Boldt , R. C. 2002 . “ The adversary system and attorney role in the drug court movement ” . In Drug courts in theory and in practice , Edited by: Nolan , J. L. 115 – 144 . New York : Aldine de Gruyter .
   Google Scholar
• Boldt , R. and Singer , J. 2006 . Juristocracy in the trenches: Problem-solving judges and therapeutic jurisprudence in drug treatment courts and unified family courts . Maryland Law Review , 65 : 82 – 100 .
   Google Scholar
• Bryant , A. and Charmaz , K. 2007 . “ Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account ” . In The Sage handbook of grounded theory , Edited by: Bryant , A. and Charmaz , K. 31 – 57 . London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Butts , J. 2001 . Introduction: Problem solving courts . Law & Policy , 23 ( 2 ) : 121 – 124 .
   Google Scholar
• Bynum , T. and Paternoster , R. 1984 . Discrimination revisited: An exploration of frontstage and backstage criminal justice making . Sociology and Social Research , 69 ( 1 ) : 90 – 108 .
   Google Scholar
• Cancino , J. M. and Enriquez , R. 2004 . A qualitative analysis of officer peer retaliation: Preserving the police culture . Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management , 27 ( 3 ) : 320 – 340 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz , K. 1995 . The body, identity, and self . The Sociological Quarterly , 36 ( 4 ) : 657 – 680 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignan , J. , Atkinson , A. , Atkinson , H. , Howes , M. , Johnstone , J. Robinson , G. 2007 . Staging restorative justice encounters against a criminal justice backdrop: A dramaturgical analysis . Criminology & Criminal Justice , 7 ( 1 ) : 5 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Eley , S. , Gallop , K. , McIvor , G. , Morgan , K. and Yates , R. 2002 . Drug treatment and testing orders: Evaluation of the Scottish pilots Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research
   Google Scholar
• Emerson , E. 2001 . Challenging behaviour , New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Feinblatt , J. and Denckla , D. 2001 . What does it mean to be a good lawyer? Prosecutors, defenders and problem-solving courts . Judicature , 84 ( 4 ) : 206 – 214 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiberg , A. 2011 . Post-adversarial and post-inquisitorial justice: Transcending traditional penological paradigms . European Journal of Criminology , 8 ( 1 ) : 82 – 101 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser , B. and Strauss , A. 1967 . The discovery of grounded theory , Chicago : Aldine .
   Google Scholar
• Goffman , E. 1959 . Presentation of self in everyday life , New York : Doubleday Anchor Books .
   Google Scholar
• Goldkamp , J. S. 2000 . The drug court response: Issues and implications for justice change . Albany Law Review , 63 : 923 – 961 .
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2011). Review of the effectiveness of specialist courts in other jurisdictions. London, England. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/crime/reducing-reoffending/dip/ (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/crime/reducing-reoffending/dip/) (Accessed: 7 February 2012 ).
   Google Scholar
• Hora , P. F. and Stalcup , T. 2007 . Drug treatment courts in the twenty-first century: The evolution of the revolution in problem-solving courts . Georgia Law Review , 42 : 717 – 743 .
   Google Scholar
• Hough , M. , Clancy , A. , McSweeney , T. and Turnbull , P. 2003 . The Impact of Drug Treatment and Testing Orders on Offending: Two-Year Reconviction Results, HORSD Findings 184 , London : Home Office .
   Google Scholar
• Lofland , J. , Snow , D. A. , Anderson , L. and Lofland , L. H. 2006 . Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis , 4th , Belmont , CA : Wadsworth .
   Google Scholar
• Matrix Knowledge Group . 2008 . Dedicated drug court pilots: A process report , London, England.
   Google Scholar
• McIvor, G. (2004). Reconviction following drug treatment and testing orders. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/26350/0029550.pdf (http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/26350/0029550.pdf) (Accessed: 7 February 2012 ).
   Google Scholar
• McIvor , G. 2009 . Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Procedural Justice in Scottish Drug Courts . Criminology & Criminal Justice , 9 : 29 – 49 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIvor , G. , Barnsdale , L. , Malloch , M. , Eley , S. and Yates , R. 2006 . The operation and effectiveness of the Scottish drug court pilots , Edinburgh : Scottish Executive Social Research .
   Google Scholar
• Miller , J. and Johnson , D. C. 2009 . Problem solving courts: A measure of justice , New York : Roman and Littlefield .
   Google Scholar
• Morrill , C. 1995 . The executive way , Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• NACDL. (2009). America's Problem Solving Courts: The Criminal Costs of Treatment and the Case for Reform. Washington, DC: National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys. http://www.nacdl.org/drugcourts (http://www.nacdl.org/drugcourts)
   Google Scholar
• National Drug Court Institute . 2002 . Ethical considerations for judges and attorneys in drug court , Alexandria , VA : National Drug Court Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Nolan , J. L. Jr . 2001 . Reinventing justice , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Orr , C. H. , Hall , J. W. , Reimer , N. L. , Mallett , E. A. , O'Dowd , K. and Frazer , A. 2009 . America's PS courts , Washington , DC : National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers .
   Google Scholar
• Pogrebin , M. and Poole , E. D. 1988 . Humor in the briefing room: A study of the strategic use of humor among police . Journal of Contemporary Ethnography , 17 : 183 – 210 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig , M. 2002 . The difficult role of the defense lawyer in post-adjudication drug treatment court: Accommodating therapeutic jurisprudence . Criminal Law Bulletin , 38 : 216 – 225 .
   Google Scholar
• Rose , M. R. , Diamond , S. S. and Baker , K. M. 2010 . Goffman on the jury: Real jurors’ attention to the “offstage” of trials . Law and Human Behavior , 34 : 310 – 323 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottman , D. 2000 . Does effective therapeutic jurisprudence require specialized courts (and do specialized courts imply specialist judges)? . Court Review , 37 ( 2 ) : 22 – 27 .
   Google Scholar
• Rottman , D. and Casey , P. 1999 . Therapeutic jurisprudence and the emergence of problem-solving courts . National Institute of Justice Journal , Summer : 12 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Rudes , D. S. and Portillo , S. in press . Roles & Power within Federal Problem-Solving Courtroom Workgroups . Law & Policy ,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shomade , S. 2010 . Case disposition in the drug court: Who is the most central actor? . The Justice System Journal , 31 ( 1 ) : 74 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow , D. A. and Anderson , L. 1993 . Down on their luck , Berkeley : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Taxman , F. S. and Belenko , S. 2011 . Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment , Boulder, Colorado: Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Thomas , J. , Mika , H. , Blakemore , J. and Aylward , A. 1991 . Exacting control through disciplinary hearings: “Making do” with prison rules . Justice Quarterly , 8 ( 1 ) : 37 – 57 .
   Google Scholar
• Waddington , P. 1999 . Police (canteen) sub-culture: An appreciation . British Journal of Criminology , 39 ( 2 ) : 287 – 309 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winick , B. J. 2002 . Therapeutic jurisprudence and problem solving courts . Fordham Urban Law Review , 30 ( 3 ) : 1055 – 1104 .
   Google Scholar
• Winick , B. J. and Wexler , D. B. 2001 . Drug treatment court: Therapeutic jurisprudence applied . Touro Law Review , 18 : 479 – 486 .
   Google Scholar
• Wolff , N. 2002 . Courts as therapeutic agents: Thinking past the novelty of mental health courts . Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law , 30 : 431 – 437 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar