Whose Statement Is It? An Examination of Victim Impact Statements Delivered in Court

REFERENCES

• Achilles, M., & Stutzman-Amstutz, L. (2006). Responding to the needs of victims: What was promised, what has been delivered. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft ( Eds.), The handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective ( pp. 211–220). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (1992). Social sciences and the criminal law: Victims of crime-plight vs. rights. Criminal Law Review, 28, 64–77.
   Google Scholar
• Amick-McMullan, A., Kilpatrick, D., & Resnick, H. (1991). Homicide as a risk factor for PTSD among surviving family members. Behavior Modification, 15(4), 545–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armour, M. (2003). Meaning making in the aftermath of homicide. Death Studies, 27, 519–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, J. H. (2003). Ten years of Payne: Victim impact evidence in capital cases. Cornell Law Review, 88, 257–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, T. (2012). “Cooling out” victims of crime: Managing victim participation in the sentencing process in a superior sentencing court. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 45, 214–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, A. (1975). Family reactions to homicide. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 391–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, J. M. (2010). Parole release decisions: Impact of positive and negative victim and nonvictim input on a representative sample of parole-eligible inmates. Violence and Victims, 25, 224–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell, P. (1999). Barbarians at the gates? A reply to the critics of the victims’ rights amendment. Utah Law Review, 479–544.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. The British Journal of Criminology, 17, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushing, R., & Scheffer, S. (2002). Dignity denied: The experience of murder victims’ family members who oppose the death penalty. Cambridge, MA: Murder Victims’ Families for Reconciliation.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R., Kunreuther, F., & Connick, E. (1984). Expanding the victim’s role in the criminal court dispositional process: The results of an experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 491–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R., & Smith, B. (1994). The effects of victim impact statements on sentencing decisions: A test in an urban setting. Justice Quarterly, 11, 453–512.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, R., Laster, K., & Inglis, N. (1994). Victim of efficiency: Criminal justice reform in Australia. International Review of Victimology, 3, 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• DuMont, J., Miller, K. L., & White, D. (2007). Social workers’ perspectives on the victim impact statements in cases of sexual assault in Canada. Women & Criminal Justice, 18, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, I. (2001). Victim participation in sentencing: The problems of incoherence. The Howard Journal, 40, 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, I. (2004). An ambiguous participant: The crime victim and criminal justice decision-making. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 967–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, T., Garvey, S., & Wells, M. (2003). Victim characteristics and victim impact evidence in South Carolina capital cases. Cornell Law Review, 88(2), 306–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englebrecht, C. M. (2011). The struggle for “ownership of conflict”: An exploration of victim participation and voice in the criminal justice system. Criminal Justice Review, 36, 129–151.
   Google Scholar
• Englebrecht, C. M. (2012). “Where do I stand?” Exploring the rules regulating victim participation in the criminal justice system. Victims & Offenders, 7, 161–184.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E. (1999). Who’s afraid of the big bad victim? Victim impact statements as victim empowerment and enhancement of justice. The Criminal Law Review, 1, 545–556.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E., & Laster, K. (1999). Neutralizing victim reform: Legal professionals’ perspectives on victims and impact statements. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 530–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez, E., & Roeger, L. (1995). The effect of victim impact statements on sentencing patterns and outcomes: The Australian experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez, E., & Rogers, L. (1999). Victim impact statements and sentencing outcomes and processes: The perspectives of legal professionals. British Journal of Criminology, 39, 216–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez, E., & Tontodonato, P. (1990). The effect of victim participation in sentencing on sentence outcome. Criminology, 28, 451–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. (1995). Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative. Law & Society Review, 29(2), 197–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fivush, R. (2005). Reconciling trauma and the self. In A. B. Brown & K. M. Poremski ( Eds.), Roads to reconciliation: Conflict and dialogue in the twenty-first century ( pp. 89–106). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, P. (1996). Victims and voyeurs: Two narrative problems at the criminal trial. In P. Brooks & P. Gewirtz ( Eds.), Law’s stories ( pp. 135–161). New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, J. (2000). Violence: Reflections on our deadliest epidemic. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D., & Pomeroy, E. (2007). Crime victimization: Assessing differences between violent and nonviolent experiences. Victims and Offenders, 2, 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, E., Koehring, H., & Quiat, M. (1998). Victim impact evidence in capital cases: Does the victim’s character matter? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (1991). The jurisprudence of victimhood. The Supreme Court Review, 93, 77–102.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J. (2003). The mental health of crime victims: Impact of legal interventions. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(2), 159–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, J. L. (2005). Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women, 11, 571–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, S. (2002). Victims for the prosecution. Boston Review, 27(5), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. (2003). Revenge or mercy? Some thoughts about survivor opinion evidence in death penalty cases. Cornell Law Review, 88, 530–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley, S., & Dorris, C. (2007). Legal rights for crime victims in the criminal justice system. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio, & S. Herman ( Eds.), Victims of crime ( pp. 299–314). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, I. M., & Morgan, E. F. (2008). Victim impact statements: Fairness to defendants? In L. J. Moriarty ( Ed.), Controversies in victimology ( pp. 115–131). Newark, NJ: Anderson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, D., & Warshaw, J. (2006). Their day in court: The role of murder victims’ families in capital juror decision making. In J. Acker & D. Karp ( Eds.), Wounds that do not bind: Victim-based perspectives on the death penalty ( pp. 275–296). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. (2002). Loss of the assumptive world: A theory of traumatic loss. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. (2006). Restoration of the assumptive world as an act of justice. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft ( Eds.), The handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective ( pp. 221–229). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J. (2006). Murder victims’ families for reconciliation: Story-telling for healing, as witness, and in public policy. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft ( Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective ( pp. 230–245). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, T. (2004). Murder, mourning, and the ideal of reconciliation. In A. B. Brown & K. M. Poremski ( Eds.), Roads to reconciliation: Conflict and dialogue in the twenty-first century ( pp. 53–68). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, W. A. (1999). Through the past darkly: A survey of the uses and abuses of victim impact evidence in capital trials. Arizona Law Review, 41, 143–192.
   Google Scholar
• Luginbuhl, J., & Burkhead, M. (1995). Victim impact evidence in a capital trial: Encouraging votes for death. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lurigio, A. J. (1987). Are all victims alike? The adverse, generalized, and differential impact of crime. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 452–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, V. (2000). Holistic restorative justice: A response to McCold. Contemporary Justice Review, 3, 451–458.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, M., & Myers, B. (2004). Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock jurors sentencing decisions. Violence and Victims, 19, 357–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLeod, M. (1986). Victim participation at sentencing. Criminal Law Bulletin, 22(6), 510–517.
   Google Scholar
• Minow, M. (1993). Surviving victim talk. UCLA Law Review, 40, 1411–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., & Smith, B. L. (2005). Victims, punishment, and parole: The effect of victim participation on parole hearings. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 333–360.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, L. (2005). Victim participation at parole hearings: Balancing victim, offender, and public interest. Criminology and Public Policy, 4, 385–390.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. (1987). The political function of narrative in organizations. Communication Monographs, 54(2), 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray-Parkes, C. (1972). Bereavement. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, B., & Arbuthnot, J. (1999). The effects of victim impact evidence on the verdicts and sentencing judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 29, 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, B., Godwin, D., Latter, R., & Winstanley, S. (2004). Victim impact statements and mock juror sentencing: The impact of dehumanizing language on a death qualified sample. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 22, 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, B., Lynn, S., & Arbuthnot, J. (2002). Victim impact testimony and juror judgments: The effects of harm information and witness demeanor. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2393–2412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, B., Roop, A., Kalnen, D., & Kehn, A. (2013). Victim impact statements and crime heinousness: A test of the saturation hypothesis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, J., & Rose, M. (2003). Victim impact testimony and the psychology of punishment. Cornell Law Review, 88, 419–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neimeyer, R., Prigerson, H., & Davies, B. (2002). Mourning and meaning. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(2), 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., & Deise, J. (2011). A heavy thumb on the scale: The effect of victim impact evidence on capital decision making. Criminology, 49, 129–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Payne vs. Tennessee, 510 US 808 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. (1990). Opening up: The healing power of confiding in others. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Rando, T. (1993). Treatment of complicated mourning. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regehr, C., Alaggia, R., Lambert, L., & Saini, M. (2008). Victims of sexual violence in the Canadian criminal courts. Victims and Offenders, 3, 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Reisner, R. L., & Nelligan, P. J. (2002). A comparative analysis of victim impact testimony in capital cases in New Jersey and Texas. In R. Muraskin & A. R. Roberts ( Eds.), Visions for change: Crime and justice in the twenty-first century ( pp. 238–264). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., & Erez, E. (2004). Communication in sentencing: Exploring the expressive function of victim impact statements. International Review of Victimology, 10, 223–244.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, A., Hoyle, C., Morgan, R., & Cape, E. (2001). Victim impact statements: Don’t work, can’t work. The Criminal Law Review, 6, 447–458.
   Google Scholar
• South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 US 805 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Sperry, W. (1992). Victim impact evidence within a retributive system of justice. Creighton Law Review, 25, 1275–1310.
   Google Scholar
• Spungen, D. (1998). Homicide: The hidden victims, a guide for professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H. (2004). Is restorative justice imposing its agenda on victims? In H. Zehr & B. Toews ( Eds.), Critical issues in restorative justice ( pp. 95–106). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundby, S. E. (2003). The capital jury and empathy: The problem of worthy and unworthy victims. Cornell Law Review, 88(2), 343–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmania, S., & Gracyalny, M. (2006). Addressing the court, the offender, and the community: A communication analysis of victim impact statements in a non-capital sentencing hearing. International Review of Victimology, 13, 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M., Coates, R., & Vos, B. (2001). The impact of victim-offender mediation: Two decades of research. Federal Probation, 65(3), 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, T. (1996). A new model of grief: Bereavement and biography. Mortality, 1(1), 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wemmers, J. (2008). Victim participation and therapeutic jurisprudence. Victims and Offenders, 3, 165–191.
   Google Scholar
• Younglove, J. A., Nelligan, P. J., & Reisner, R. L. (2009). Victim character evidence in death penalty cases. How many songs is too many? Criminal Justice Review, 34, 536–552.
   Google Scholar