I Forgive You, but You Must Die: Murder Victim Family Members, the Death Penalty, and Restorative Justice

REFERENCES

• American Heritage Dictionary. (1992). (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Amick-McMullan, A., Kilpatrick, D. G., & Resnick, H. S. (1991). Homicide as a risk factor for PTSD among surviving family members. Behavior Modification, 15, 545–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amick-McMullan, A., Kilpatrick, D. G., Veronen, L. J., & Smith, S. (1989). Family survivors of homicide victims: Theoretical perspectives and an exploratory study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2, 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Armour, M. P. (2003). Meaning making in the aftermath of homicide. Death Studies, 27, 519–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armour, M. P., & Umbreit, M. S. (2007). Exploring “closure” and the ultimate penal sanction for survivors of homicide victims. Marquette Law Review, 91, 381–424.
   Google Scholar
• Armour, M. P., & Umbreit, M. S. (2012). Assessing the impact of the ultimate penal sanction on homicide survivors: A two state comparison. Marquette Law Review, 96, 1–131.
   Google Scholar
• Barrile, L. G. (2010a, February). A family divided: Murder survivors’ attitudes about punishment. Paper presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences annual conference, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Barrile, L. G. (2010b, November). It was a sad sorry: Murder survivors’ attitudes about the offender and the execution. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology annual conference, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Barrile, L. G., Slone, N., & Larned, D. (2008, March). Are executions therapeutic for co-victims of murder? Paper presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences annual meeting, Cincinnati, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 79–104). Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark County Prosecutor’s Office. (2014). U.S. executions since 1976. Retrieved February 7, 2014, from http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/death/usexecute.htm
   Google Scholar
• Death Penalty Information Center. (2013). Facts about the death penalty. Retrieved November 11, 2013, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/FactSheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dominus, S., & Hugo, P. (2014, April 6). Portraits of persecution. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved April 6, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/04/06/magazine/06-pieter-hugo-rwanda-portraits.html?ref=magazine&_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Enright, R. D., Santons, M. J. D., & Al-Mabuk, R. (1989). The adolescent as forgiver. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, G. L., Von Bargen, J., & Jester, M. (1996). Managing murder: Parents as mediators of children’s experience. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 732–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, S. R., & Matheson, D. J. (2003). What they say at the end: Capital victims’ families and the press. Cornell Law Review, 88, 486–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janoff-Bulman, R., & Frieze, I. H. (1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, D. A. (2001). The burden of sympathy: How families cope with mental illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritzen, P. (1992). Religion and emotional transformation. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madeira, J. L. (2010). Why rebottle the genie? Capitalizing on closure in death penalty proceedings. Indiana Law Journal, 85, 1477–1525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., & Worthington, E. L. (1994). Models of interpersonal forgiveness and their applications to counseling: Review and critique. Counseling and Values, 39, 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Victims of Crime. (2010). Victims’ bill of rights. Retrieved September 13, 2010, from http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32697
   Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, H. E. (2006). Peacemaking: Reflections of a radical criminologist. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinney, R. (1991). The way of peace. In H. E. Pepinsky & R. Quinney (Eds.), Criminology as peacemaking (pp. 3–13). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinney, R. (1993). A life of crime. Criminology and public policy as peacemaking. Journal of Crime and Justice, 16, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, S. F. (2005). Hidden victims: The effects of the death penalty on families of the accused. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slone, N., & Barrile, L. G. (2007 March). Collateral victim responses to the last statements of executed offenders. Paper presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences annual conference, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Strelan, P., Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. (2011). Retributive and inclusive justice goals and forgiveness: The influence of motivational values. Social Justice Research, 24, 126–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmania, S. J., & Mangis, D. E. (2005). Finding the right time and place: A case study comparison of the expression of offender remorse in traditional justice and restorative justice contexts. Marquette Law Review, 89, 335–358.
   Google Scholar
• Takada, N., & Ohbuchi, K. (2013). True and hollow forgiveness: Forgiveness, motives and conflict resolution. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24, 184–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Texas Department of Criminal Justice. (2014). Death row information. Retrieved April 2, 2014, from http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/stat/dr_executed_offenders.html
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2006). Why? What happens when people give reasons and why. New Brunswick, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2008). Credit and blame. New Brunswick, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M. S., & Vos, B. (2000). Homicide survivors meet the offender prior to execution: Restorative justice through dialogue. Homicide Studies, 4, 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Martin, K. A. (2006). Facilitated dialogue on death row: Family members of murder victims and inmates share their experiences. In J. R. Acker & D. R. Karp (Eds.), Wounds that do not bind: Victim-based perspectives on the death penalty (pp. 349–375). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2006). Christian fundamentalism and support for capital punishment. Journal of Research on Crime & Delinquency, 43, 169–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2012). The varying meaning of forgiveness: Relationship closeness moderates how forgiveness affects feelings of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 420–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimring, F. E. (2003). The contradictions of American capital punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar