Prisons or Problem-Solving: Does the Public Support Specialty Courts?

References

• Allen, F. A. (1981). The decline of the rehabilitative ideal: Penal policy and social purpose. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin-Plunk, C. A., & Sloas, L. B. (2018). Support for balanced justice and rehabilitation for justice-involved veterans. Criminal Justice Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0734016818793698.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, G., & Feinblatt, J. (2001). Problem-solving courts: A brief primer. Law & Policy, 23, 125–140. doi:10.1111/1467-9930.00107
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, R. C. (2010). The “tomahawk” and the “healing balm”: Drug treatment courts in theory and practice. University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender, and Class, 10, 44–71.
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, R. C. (2014). Problem-solving courts and pragmatism. Maryland Law Review, 73, 1120–1172.
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, R. C. (2017). Problem-solving courts. In E. Luna (Ed.), Reforming criminal justice: Volume 3, pretrial and trial processes (pp. 273–304). Phoenix: Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, P., & Whitehead, S. (2016). Problem-solving courts: An evidence review. London, UK: Centre for Justice Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. (2017). Right on Crime: Conservative reform in the era of mass imprisonment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., Cullen, F. T., & Thielo, A. J. (2019). The First Step Act: Correctional reform in an era of mass incarceration. Unpublished manuscript, Texas Public Policy Foundation, Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, B. L., (2011). Mental health courts effectiveness in reducing recidivism and improving clinical outcomes: A meta-analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa.
   Google Scholar
• CSG Justice Center. (2016). Facts and trends: the mentally ill offender treatment and crime reeducation act. Retrieved from https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/MIOTCRA_Fact_Sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T. (2013). Rehabilitation: Beyond nothing works. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice in America, 1975–2025 (Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 42, pp. 299–376). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., Cullen, J. B., & Mathers, R. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305–331. doi:10.1177/0093854885012003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Fisher, B. S., & Applegate, B. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 14, pp. 1–79). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. Prison Journal, 81, 313–338. doi:10.1177/0032885501081003002
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., & Gilbert, K. E. (1982). Reaffirming rehabilitation. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (2017). Correctional theory: Context and consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). Prisons do not reduce recidivism: The high cost of ignoring science. Prison Journal, 91, 48S–65S. doi:10.1177/0032885511415224
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Manchak, S. M., & Duriez, S. A. (2014). Before adopting Project HOPE, read the warning label: A rejoinder to Kleiman, Kilmer, and Fisher’s comment. Federal Probation, 78(2), 75–77.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Pealer, J. A., Fisher, B. S., Applegate, B. K., & Santana, S. A. (2002). Public support for correctional rehabilitation in America: Change or consistency? In J. V. Roberts & M. Hough (Eds.), Changing attitudes to punishment: Public opinion, crime and justice (pp. 128–147). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Pratt, T. C., Turanovic, J. J., & Butler, L. (2018). When bad news arrives: Project HOPE in a post-factual world. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 34, 13–34. doi:10.1177/1043986217750424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douds, A. S., Ahlin, E. M., Howard, D., & Stigerwalt, S. (2017). Varieties of veterans’ courts: A statewide assessment of veterans’ treatment court components. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28, 740–769. doi:10.1177/0887403415620633
   Google Scholar
• Douds, A. S., & Hammer, D. (2019). When a veteran’s court fails: Lessons learned from a qualitative evaluation. Victims & Offenders, 14(this issue).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enns, P. K. (2014). The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 857–872. doi:10.1111/ajps.2014.58.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, T. J., & Caulfield, S. L. (1984). Public opinion and prison policy: A review. Prison Journal, 64, 31–46. doi:10.1177/003288558406400205
   Google Scholar
• Haner, M., Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., Burton, A. L., & Kulig, T. C. (2019). Price of liberty or never again: Americans’ views on preventing mass murder. Justice Evaluation Journal. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1569474.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. (1968). Changing public attitudes toward crime and corrections. Federal Probation, 32(4), 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kulig, T. C., & Butler, L. (2019). From “whores” to “victims”: The rise and status of sex trafficking courts. Victims & Offenders, 14(this issue).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, S., & Liu, T.-H. (2019). Problem-solving courts in China: Background, development, and current status. Victims & Offenders, 14(this issue).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Link, N. W., Cullen, F. T., Agnew, R., & Link, B. G. (2016). Can general strain theory help us understand violent behaviors among people with mental illnesses? Justice Quarterly, 33, 729–754. doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1005656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, M. W., & Link, N. W. (2019). Taking stock of drug courts: Do they work?. Victims & Offenders, 14(this issue).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowder, E. M., Rade, C. B., & Desmarais, S. L. (2018). Effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism: A meta-analysis. Psychiatric Services, 69, 15–22. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201700107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B. (2011). The verdict on drug courts and other problem-solving courts. Chapman Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 57–96.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B., Hardin, C. D., & Fox, C. L. (2016). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving courts in the United States. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, H. D., Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., Burton, A. L., & Burton, V. S., Jr. (in press). Will Black lives still matter to the police: African Americans’ concerns in the Trump presidency. Victims & Offenders.
   Google Scholar
• Mears, D. P., Pickett, J. T., & Mancini, C. (2015). Support for balanced juvenile justice: Assessing views about youth, rehabilitation, and punishment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 459–479. doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9234-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O. (2011). Drug and other specialty courts. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of crime and criminal justice (pp. 843–871). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60–71. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for State Courts. (2018). Problem-solving courts. Retrieved from https://www.ncsc.org/Topics/Alternative-Dockets/Problem-Solving-Courts/Home.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, J. L., Jr. (2012). Problem-solving courts: An international comparison. In J. Petersilia & K. R. Reitz (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sentencing and corrections (pp. 150–172). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., & Cullen, F. T. (2015). Liberal but not stupid: Meeting the promise of downsizing prisons. Stanford Journal of Criminal Law and Policy, 2(1), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T. (2019). Public opinion and criminal justice policy: Theory and research. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 405–428. doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., & Turanovic, J. J. (2019). A criminological eye in the ointment: Specialty courts and the generality of deviance. Victims & Offenders, 14(this issue).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramirez, M. D. (2013a). The polls—Trends: Americans’ changing views on crime and punishment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 1006–1031. doi:10.1093/poq/nft040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, M. D. (2013b). Punitive sentiment. Criminology, 51, 329–364. doi:10.1111/crim.2013.51.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, S. B., Willison, J. B., Mallik-Kane, K., Kim, K., Debus-Sherrill, S., & Downey, P. M. (2012). Criminal justice interventions for offenders with mental illness: Evaluation of mental health courts in Bronx and Brooklyn, New York—Final report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, D. J. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in Progressive America. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Sarteschi, C. M., Vaughn, M. G., & Kim, K. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 12–20. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., & Beriman, M. (2019). Problem-solving courts in Australia: A review of problems and solutions. Victims & Offenders, 14(this issue).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevigny, E. L., Fuleihan, B. K., & Ferdik, F. V. (2013). Do drug courts reduce the use of incarceration? A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 416–425. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K. (2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28, 493–521. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.525222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloas, L. B., & Atkin-Plunk, C. A. (2018). Perceptions of balanced justice and rehabilitation for drug offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0887403418762532.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Labrecque, R. M., Smith, W. E., & Latessa, E. J. (2012). Development and implementation of a case review conference model for juveniles: A structured approach to learning from unsuccessful probationers. Federal Probation, 76(1), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, D. M., DeBerard, S., & Homan, K. J. (2013). Predicting success and failure in juvenile treatment drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44, 159–168. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2012.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, D. M., Homan, K. J., & DeBerard, S. (2015). The effectiveness of juvenile treatment drug courts: A meta-analytic review of literature. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 24, 80–93. doi:10.1080/1067828X.2013.764371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, J. K. (2018). A theory of civil problem-solving courts. New York University Law Review, 93, 1579–1632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, S. M., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2016). Census of problem-solving courts, 2012. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C. J., Blair, L., Latessa, E., & Sullivan, C. C. (2016). Juvenile drug courts and recidivism: Results from a multisite outcome study. Justice Quarterly, 33, 291–318. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.908937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundt, J., Cullen, F. T., Thielo, A. J., & Jonson, C. L. (2015). Public willingness to downsize prisons: Implications from Oregon. Victims & Offenders, 10, 365–379. doi:10.1080/15564886.2015.1078180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner-Smith, E. E., Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2016). Juvenile drug court effects on recidivism and drug use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 477–513. doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9274-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielo, A. J. (2017). Redemption in an era of penal harm: Moving beyond offender exclusion (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Thielo, A. J., Cullen, F. T., Cohen, D. M., & Chouhy, C. (2016). Rehabilitation in a Red State: Public support for correctional reform in Texas. Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 137–170. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, J., Finlay, A., Flatley, B., Kasprow, W. J., & Clark, S. (2018). A national study of veterans treatment court participants: Who benefits and who recidivates. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 45, 236–244. doi:10.1007/s10488-017-0816-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., Cochran, J. K., Cullen, F. T., & Applegate, B. K. (2010). The pragmatic American: Attributions of crime and the hydraulic relation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 431–457. doi:10.1080/07418820902855362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., & Britt, C. L. (2014). Statistics in criminal justice (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Winick, B. J., & Wexler, D. B. (2002). Drug treatment court: Therapeutic jurisprudence applied. Touro Law Review, 18, 479–485.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, J. (2007). Principle of problem-solving justice. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• YouGov. (2017). National Survey on Criminal Justice Issues: Core profile items. Redwood City, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• YouGov. (2018). What the world thinks. Retrieved from https://today.yougov.com/
   Google Scholar