Taking Stock of Drug Courts: Do They Work?

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2014). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed. ed.). New Providence, NJ: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7–27. doi:10.1177/0011128705281756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko, S. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review: 2001 update. New York, NY: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko, S., Fabrikant, N., & Wolff, N. (2011). The long road to treatment: Models of screening and admission into Drug Courts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1222–1243. doi:10.1177/0093854811424690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko, S., Fagan, J. A., & Dumanovsky, T. (1994). The effects of legal sanctions on recidivism in special drug courts. Justice System Journal, 17, 53–81. doi:10.1080/23277556.1994.10871193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhati, A. S., Roman, J. K., & Chalfin, A. (2008). To treat or not to treat: Evidence on the prospects of expanding treatment to drug-involved offenders. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, R. C. (1998). Rehabilitative punishment and the drug treatment court movement. Washington University Law Quarterly, 76, 1205–1300.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, M. P. (2001). An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) drug court program. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 177–206. doi:10.1177/002204260103100110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. M., Mackin, J. R., & Finigan, M. W. (2012). What works? The ten key components of drug court: Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8, 6–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cissner, A. B., Rempel, M., Franklin, A. W., Roman, J. K., Bieler, S., Cohen, R., & Cadoret, C. R. (2013). A statewide evaluation of New York’s adult drug courts. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608. doi:10.2307/2094589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connery, H. S. (2015). Medication-assisted treatment of opioid use disorder: Review of the evidence and future directions. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 23, 63–75. doi:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coviello, D. M., Cornish, J. W., Lynch, K. G., Boney, T. Y., Clark, C. A., & Lee, J. D. (2012). A multisite pilot study of extended-release injectable naltrexone treatment for previously opioid-dependent parolees and probationers. Substance Abuse, 33, 48–59. doi:10.1080/08897077.2011.609438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11, 527–559. doi:10.1080/07418829400092421
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (2016). Correctional theory: Context and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Myer, A. J., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Eight lessons from Moneyball: The high cost of ignoring evidence-based corrections. Victims & Offenders, 4, 197–213. doi:10.1080/15564880802612631
   Google Scholar
• DeMatteo, D. S., Marlowe, D. B., & Festinger, D. S. (2006). Secondary prevention services for clients who are low risk in drug court: A conceptual model. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 114–134. doi:10.1177/0011128705281751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschenes, E. P., & Greenwood, P. W. (1994). Maricopa County’s drug court: An innovative program for first-time drug offenders on probation. Justice System Journal, 17, 99–115. doi:10.1080/23277556.1994.10871195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, P. M., & Roman, J. K. (2010). A Bayesian meta-analysis of drug court cost-effectiveness. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, E. K., Aos, S., & Miller, M. G. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims & Offenders, 4, 170–196. doi:10.1080/15564880802612615
   Google Scholar
• Drake, E. K., & Barnoski, R. P. (2006). Recidivism findings for juvenile rehabilitation administration's mentoring program. Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Dynia, P., & Sung, H. E. (2000). The safety and effectiveness of diverting felony drug offenders to residential treatment as measured by recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 299–311. doi:10.1177/0887403400011004002
   Google Scholar
• Farole, D. J., & Cissner, A. B. (2007). Seeing eye to eye: Participant and staff perspectives on drug courts. In G. Berman, M. Rempel, & R. V. Wolf (Eds.), Documenting results: Research on problem-solving justice (pp. 51–73). New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 117–130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. S., White, M. D., & Robinson, J. B. (2002). An honest chance: Perspectives on drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14, 369–372. doi:10.1525/fsr.2002.14.6.369
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, D. C., Kearley, B. W., & Bushway, S. D. (2008). Substance use, drug treatment, and crime: An examination of intra- individual variation in a drug court population. Journal of Drug Issues, 38, 601–630. doi:10.1177/002204260803800211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, D. C., Najaka, S. S., Kearley, B. W., & Rocha, C. M. (2006). Long-term effects of participation in the Baltimore City drug treatment court: Results from an experimental study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 67–98. doi:10.1007/s11292-005-5128-8
   Google Scholar
• Granfield, R., Eby, C., & Brewster, T. (1998). An examination of the Denver drug court: The impact of treatment-oriented drug-offender system. Law and Policy, 20, 183–202. doi:10.1111/1467-9930.00047
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., & Winik, D. (2010). Using random judge assignments to estimate the effects of incarceration and probation on recidivism among drug offenders. Criminology, 48, 357–387. doi:10.1111/crim.2010.48.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havnes, I., Bukten, A., Gossop, M., Waal, H., Stangeland, P., & Clausen, T. (2012). Reductions in convictions for violent crime during opioid maintenance treatment: A longitudinal national cohort study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 124, 307–310. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebner, B. M., & Cobbina, J. (2007). The effect of drug use, drug treatment participation, and treatment completion on probationer recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 37, 619–641. doi:10.1177/002204260703700307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. G. (2013). Early-phase outcomes from a randomized trial of intensive judicial supervision in an Australian drug court. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 453–468. doi:10.1177/0093854812449215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. G., & Kemp, R. I. (2014). The strength of the participant-judge relationship predicts better drug court outcomes. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21, 165–175. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.798392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinlock, T. W., Gordon, M. S., Schwartz, R. P., & O’Grady, K. E. (2008). A study of methadone maintenance for male prisoners: Three-month postrelease outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 34–47. doi:10.1177/0093854807309111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koob, J., Brocato, J., & Kleinpeter, C. (2011). Enhancing residential treatment for drug court participants. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 252–271.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2011). Corrections in the community. Burlington, MA: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Latimer, J., Morton-Bourgon, K., & Chrétien, J. A. (2006). A meta-analytic examination of drug treatment courts: Do they reduce recidivism?. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Justice Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Listwan, S. J., Sundt, J. L., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 389–411. doi:10.1177/0011128703049003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J., & Sullivan, C. J. (2017). Learning more from evaluation of justice interventions: Further consideration of theoretical mechanisms in juvenile drug courts. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 1091–1115. doi:10.1177/0011128716629757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovins, L. B., Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2007). Application of the risk principle to female offenders. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 383–398. doi:10.1177/1043986207309437
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Are drug courts effective: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Community Corrections, 1, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low-risk offenders. In Topics in Community Corrections 2004 (pp. 3–8). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 263–290. doi:10.1111/cpp.2005.4.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 575–594. doi:10.1111/cpp.2006.5.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, K., & Pastore, A. L. (1999). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, 1998 (US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 176356). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Magura, S., Lee, J. D., Hershberger, J., Joseph, H., Marsch, L., Shropshire, C., & Rosenblum, A. (2009). Buprenorphine and methadone maintenance in jail and post-release: A randomized clinical trial. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 99, 222–230. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. (2010). Research update on adult drug courts. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B., DeMatteo, D. S., & Festinger, D. S. (2003). A sober assessment of drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 16, 153–157. doi:10.1525/fsr.2003.16.2.153
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Foltz, C., Lee, P. A., & Patapis, N. S. (2005). Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 183–198. doi:10.1002/bsl.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matusow, H., Dickman, S. L., Rich, J. D., Fong, C., Dumont, D. M., Hardin, C., … Rosenblum, A. (2013). Medication assisted treatment in U.S. drug courts: Results from a nationwide survey of availability, barriers and attitudes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment., 44, 473–480. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2012.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, 587, 16–30. doi:10.1177/0002716202250781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeeley, S., & Warner, J. J. (2015). Replication in criminology: A necessary practice. European Journal of Criminology, 12, 581–597. doi:10.1177/1477370815578197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miethe, T. D., Lu, H., & Reese, E. (2000). Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in Drug Court: Explanations for some unexpected findings. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 522–541. doi:10.1177/0011128700046004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., & Shutt, J. E. (2001). Considering the need for empirically grounded drug court screening mechanisms. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 91–106. doi:10.1177/002204260103100106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and nontraditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60–71. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2013). Adult drug court best practice standards. Vol. 1, Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nadcp.org/standards/.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2015). Adult drug court best practice standards. Vol. 2, Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nadcp.org/standards/.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Justice Programs. (2018). Drug courts (NCJ 238527). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ostermann, M., Salerno, L. M., & Hyatt, J. M. (2015). How different operationalizations of recidivism impact conclusions of effectiveness of parole supervision. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 771–796. doi:10.1177/0022427815580626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, R. H., Haas, A. L., & Murrin, M. R. (1999). Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2, 33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 72–96. doi:10.1177/0093854800027001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, P. M., Abraham, A. J., & Knudsen, H. K. (2011). Using medication-assisted treatment for substance use disorders: Evidence of barriers and facilitators of implementation. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 584–589. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, S. B., Rempel, M., Roman, J. K., Zweig, J. M., Lindquist, C. H., Green, M., … Farole, D. J. (2011). The multisite adult drug court evaluation: The impact of drug courts, Vol. 4. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 555–592. doi:10.1111/crim.2003.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saum, C. A., & Hiller, M. L. (2008). Should violent offenders be excluded from drug court participation? An examination of the recidivism of violent and nonviolent drug court participants. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 291–307. doi:10.1177/0734016808322267
   Google Scholar
• Saum, C. A., Scarpitti, F. R., & Robbins, C. A. (2001). Violent offenders in drug court. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 107–128. doi:10.1177/002204260103100107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., Cullen, F. T., & Eck, J. E. (2016). Environmental corrections: A new paradigm for supervising offenders in the community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sechrest, D. K., & Shicor, D. (2001). Determinants of graduation from a day treatment drug court in California: A preliminary study. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 129–147. doi:10.1177/002204260103100108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senjo, S. R., & Leip, L. A. (2001). Testing and developing theory in drug court: A four-part logit model to predict program completion. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12, 66–87. doi:10.1177/0887403401012001004
   Google Scholar
• Sevigny, E. L., Fuleihan, B. K., & Ferdik, F. V. (2013). Do drug courts reduce the use of incarceration?: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 416–425. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K. (2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28, 493–521. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.525222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (2011). Group therapy for substance use disorders: A motivational cognitive-behavioral approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2002). The effect of imprisonment on recidivism rates of felony offenders: A focus on drug offenders. Criminology, 40, 329–358. doi:10.1111/crim.2002.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., Piper, R. K., Martin, T., & Frenzel, E. D. (2001). Drug courts and recidivism: The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 149–176. doi:10.1177/002204260103100109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, D. M., Homan, K. J., & DeBerard, S. (2015). The effectiveness of juvenile treatment drug courts: A meta-analytic review of literature. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44, 159–168. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C. J., Blair, L., Latessa, E., & Sullivan, C. C. (2016). Juvenile drug courts and recidivism: Results from a multisite outcome study. Justice Quarterly, 33, 291–318. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.908937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner-Smith, E. E., Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2016). Juvenile drug court effects on recidivism and drug use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 477–513. doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9274-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Belenko, S. (2013). Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Bouffard, J. A. (2005). Treatment as a part of drug court: The impact on graduation rates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42, 23–50. doi:10.1300/J076v42n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. doi:10.1086/652233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vito, G. F., & Tewksbury, R. A. (1998). The impact of treatment: The Jefferson County (Kentucky) drug court program. Federal Probation, 62(1), 46–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., & Cao, Y. (2004). Risk and prison substance abuse treatment outcomes: A replication and challenge. The Prison Journal, 84, 106–120. doi:10.1177/0032885503262458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487. doi:10.1007/s11292-006-9019-4
   Google Scholar
• Winick, B. J. (1997). The jurisprudence of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 184–195. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.3.1.184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E., & Colyer, C. (2001). Everyday hassles: Barriers to recovery in drug court. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 233–258. doi:10.1177/002204260103100112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalom, I. D. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed. ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zweig, J. M., Lindquist, C., Downey, P. M., Roman, J. K., & Rossman, S. B. (2012). Drug court policies and practices: How program implementation affects offender substance use and criminal behavior outcomes. Drug Court Review, 8, 43–79.
   Google Scholar