What Do Victim/Survivors of Sexual Violence Think about Circles of Support and Accountability?

References

• Allen-Collinson, J. (2011). Feminist phenomenology and the woman in the running body. Sports, Ethics and Philosophy, 5(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2011.602584
   Google Scholar
• Almond, P., Bates, A., & Wilson, C. (2015). Circles of Support and Accountability: Criminal justice volunteers as the ‘deliberative public’. British Journal of Community Justice, 13(1), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, R., Marcus, J., Waldburger, M., Schneider, A., Morasch, B., & Schmid, F. (2016). All but neutral: Citizen responses to the European Commission’s public consultation on network neutrality. In L. Belli & P. De Filippi (Eds.), Net neutrality compendium: Human rights, free competition and the future of the internet (pp. 199–210). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (2015). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning US.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, V. (2007). The politics of pain: A political institutionalist analysis of crime victims’ moral protests. Law & Society Review, 41(3), 619–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, A., Macrae, R., Williams, D., & Webb, C. (2012). Ever-increasing circles: A descriptive study of Hampshire and Thames Valley circles of support and accountability 2002-09. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 183(3), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.544415
   Google Scholar
• Bates, A., Saunders, R., & Wilson, C. (2007). Doing something about it: A follow-up study of sex offenders participating in Thames Valley Circles of Support and Accountability. British Journal of Community Justice, 5(1), 19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, A., Williams, D., Wilson, C., & Wilson, R. (2014). Circles south east: The first 10 years 2002-2012. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(7), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13485362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayens, G., & Roberson, C. (2011). Criminal justice research methods: Theory and practice, Second edition. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (2001). Introduction. In G. Bazemore & M. Schiff (Eds.), Restorative community justice: Repairing harm and tranforming communities (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohmert, M. N., Duwe, G., & Hipple, N. K. (2016). Evaluating restorative justice circles of support and accountability: Can social support overcome structural barriers? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(3), 739–758. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0306624X16652627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, T., & Carrington, K. (2007). A comparative analysis of the victim policies across the Anglo-speaking world. In S. Walklate (Ed.), Handbook of victims and victimology (pp. 380–415). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bouhours, B., & Daly, K. (2008). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, D. (2011, 13 December). €215k cinema trips to cure child abusers, Daily Mail. p. np.
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield, L., & Hill, J. (2014). Criminological research for beginners: A student’s guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Sex Offender Management. (2018) . Advancing a victim-centered approach to supervising sex offenders: A toolkit for practitioners. CSOM.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Z., Fung, Y., & Chien, W. (2018). Bracketing in phenomenology: Only undertaken in the data collection and analysis process? The Qualitative Report, 18(30), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Chouinard, J., & Riddick, C. (2014). An evaluation of the circles of support and accountability demonstration project: Final report. Collaborative Centre for Justice and Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. (2015). A fair way to go: Justice for victim-survivors of sexual violence. In A. Powell, N. Henry, & A. Flynn (Eds.), Rape Justice - beyond the criminal law (pp. 18–35). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H., & Quadara, A. (2010). Insights into sexual assault perpetration: Giving voice to victim/survivors’ knowledge. Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., Warwick, L., & Vollm, B. (2017). Circles of support and accountability: The characteristics of core members in England and Wales. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 27(2), 191–206. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cbm.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correctional Service Canada. (2002). Circles of support and accountability: A guide to training potential volunteers.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1107797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duwe, G. (2018). Can circles of support and accountability (CoSA) significantly reduce sexual recidivism? Results from a randomized controlled trial in Minnesota. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(4), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9325-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, H., Winder, B., Lievesley, R., Blagden, N., Kitson-Boyce, R., & Dwerry-House, M. (2017). Evaluation of safer living foundation cirlces of support and accountability. Sexual Offences, Crime and Misconduct Research Unit, Nottingham Trent University.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, M., Anzul, M., Friedman, T., Garner, D., & McCormack Steinmetz, A. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, K., & Walklate, S. (2018). Gender, crime and criminal justice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Floersch, J., Longhofer, J., Kranke, D., & Townsend, L. (2010). Integrating thematic, grounded theory and narrative analysis: A case study of adolescent psychotropic treatment. Qualitative Social Work, 9(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010362330
   Google Scholar
• Fox, K. (2014). Restoring the social: Offender reintegration in a risky world. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38(3), 235–256. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01924036.2013.848221
   Google Scholar
• Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hannem, S. (2011). Experiences in reconciling risk management and restorative justice: How Circles of Support and Accountability work restoratively in the risk society. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11432538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannem, S., & Petrunik, M. (2007). Circles of Support and Accountability: A community justice initiative for the reintegration of high risk sex offenders. Contemporary Justice Review, 10(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580701372046
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J. (2005). Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women, 11(5), 571–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205274450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (2007). Feminist research practice: A primer. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hohl, K., & Stanko, E. (2015). Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 12(3), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815571949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höing, M., Vogelvang, B., & Bogaerts, S. (2015). “I am a different man now” - Sex offenders in circles of support and accountability: A prospective study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(7), 1–22. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0306624X15612431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jülich, S. (2006). Views of justice among survivors of historical child sexual abuse: Implications for restorative justice in New Zealand. Theoretical Criminology, 10(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606059988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jülich, S., & Landon, F. (2017). Achieving justice outcomes: Participants of Project Restore’s restorative processes. In E. Zinsstag & M. Keenan (Eds.), Restorative responses to sexual violence: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions (pp. 192–211). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., Lovett, J., & Regan, L. (2005). A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N., Tully, R., & Vollm, B. (2018). Volunteering with sex offenders: The attitudes of volunteers towards sex offenders, their treatment, and rehabilitation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(6), 659–675. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1079063217691964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koss, M. (2014). The RESTORE Program of restorative justice for sex crimes: Vision, process, and outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(9), 1623–1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513511537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraska, P., & Neuman, W. (2012). Essential criminal justice and criminology research methods. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lievore, D. (2004). Recidivism of sexual assault offenders: Rates, risk factors and treatment efficacy. Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, G., Willis, G., & Gibson, K. (2017). You do what? A qualitative investigation into the motivation to volunteer with Circles of Support and Accountability. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217729157
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, F., & Wager, N. (2015). Restorative justice in cases of sexual violence: Exploring the views of the public and survivors Probation. Journal 62(4), 336–356. doi:10.1177/0264550515619571
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, F., & Wager, N. (2012). Restorative justice in cases of sexual violence: Exploring the views of the public and survivors. Probation Journal, 62(4), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550515619571
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, N. (1994). Confronting rape: The feminist anti-rape movement and the state. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McAlinden, A.-M. (2007). The shaming of sexual offenders: Risk, retribution and reintegration. Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McCartan, K. (2016). Circles of Support and Accountability social impact evaluation: Final report. Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• McCartan, K., Kemshall, H., Westwood, S., Solle, J., MacKenzie, G., Cattel, J., & Pollard, A. (2014). Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA): A case file review of two pilots. Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C., & Westmarland, N. (2019). Kaleidoscopic justice: Sexual violence and victim-survivors’ perceptions of justice. Social & Legal Studies, 28(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918761200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C., Westmarland, N., & Godden, N. (2012). `I just wanted him to hear me’: Sexual violence and the possibilities of restorative justice. Journal of Law and Society, 39, 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00579.x
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, P. (2004, 29 November). Parties for perverts; Fury over scheme that rewards abusers to stop them reoffending, Daily Mail. p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, M. (2010). “Cherry picking”. Writing from Thin Data Qualitative Health Research, 20(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309354285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Victims of Crime. (2005). Bringing victims and victim service providers into reentry planning in New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• National Reentry Resource Center. (nd). Circles of Support and Accountability. https://nationalreentryresourcecenter.org/circles-of-support-and-accountability/
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, M. (2009). Circles of Support and Accountability for sex offenders in England and Wales: Their origins and implementation between 1999-2005. British Journal of Community Justice, 7(1), 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Pompili, M. (2010). Exploring the phenomenology of suicide. Suicide & Life-threatening Behavior, 40(3), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2010.40.3.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaker Peace and Social Witness. (2005). Circles of support and accountability in the Thames Valley: The first three years April 2002 to March 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Quaker Peace and Social Witness. (2008). HTV Circles - Six years of safer communities: Six year report April 2002 to March 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Remeikis, A. (2019, 9 January). Peter Dutton calls for national child-sex offender register, The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jan/09/peter-dutton-calls-for-national-child-sex-offender-register
   Google Scholar
• Renzetti, C. (1997). Confessions of a reformed positivist: Feminist participatory research as good social science. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 131–143). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K. (2018). Born this way? A qualitative examination of public perceptions of the causes of pedophilia and sexual offending against children. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 39(7), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1335526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, K., Death, J., & McCartan, K. (2020). Community-based approaches to sexual offender reintegration. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K., & McCartan, K. (2018). Public opinion about Circles of Support and Accountability: A qualitative analysis. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 39(3), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1304800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rock, P. (2008). The treatment of victims in England and Wales. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 2(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pan012
   Google Scholar
• Seto, M. (2009). Pedophilia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153618
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skrapec, C. (2001). Phenomenology and serial murder: Asking different questions. Homicide Studies, 5(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767901005001004
   Google Scholar
• Spoo, S., Kaylor, L., Schaaf, S., Rosselli, M., Laake, A., Johnson, C., & Jeglic, E. (2018). Victims’ attitudes toward sex offenders and sex offender legislation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3385–3407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17740537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. (2010, 5 December). CHILD SEX CONVICTS PAID TO GO BOWLING, Mail On Sunday. p. np.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H. (2001). The crime victim movement as a force in civil society. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 69–82). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H., & Sherman, L. (2003). Repairing the harm: Victims and restorative justice. Utah Law Review, 1, 15–42. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/utahlr2003&div=9&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & Gassner, L. (2010). Stemming the flow: Challenges for policing adult sexual assault with regard to attrition rates and under‐reporting of sexual offences. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 11(3), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614260902830153
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., Thomas, T., & Karstedt, S. (2017). The resettlement of sex offenders after custody: Circles of Support and Accountability. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager, N., & Wilson, C. (2017). Circles of Support and Accountability: Survivors as volunteers and the restorative potential. In E. Zinsstag & M. Keenan (Eds.), Restorative responses to sexual violence: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions (pp. 265–282). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, S., Vickers, B., Bernard, R., Blackburn, A., Borgatti, S., Gravlee, C., & Johnson, J. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLoS One, 13(6), e0198606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Cortoni, F., & McWhinnie, A. (2009). Circles of Support and Accountability: A Canadian replication of outcome findings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21(4), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063209347724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Picheca, J., & Prinzo, M. (2005). Circles of Support and Accountability: An evaluation of the pilot project in south-central Ontario. Correctional Service Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Picheca, J., & Prinzo, M. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of professionally-facilitated volunteerism in the community-based management of high-risk sexual offenders: Part One - Effects on participants and stakeholders. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00475.x
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018) . International Classification of Diseases 11. WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Wortley, R., & Smallbone, S. (2006). Applying situational principles to sexual offenses against children. In R. Wortley & S. Smallbone (Eds.), Situational prevention of child sexual abuse (pp. 7–35). Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H., & Mika, H. (1998). Fundamental concepts of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 1(1), 47–55.
   Google Scholar