References
- Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI–R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
- Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Routledge.
- Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 8(3), 369–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x
- Bourgon, G., & Armstrong, B. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804270618
- Clear, T. R., & Latessa, E. J. (1993). Probation officers’ roles in intensive supervision: Surveillance versus treatment. Justice Quarterly, 10(3), 441–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829300091921
- Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Policies, practices, and decisions of the criminal justice system (Vol. 3, pp. 299–370). National Institute of Justice.
- Gendreau, P. (1996a). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(1), 144–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854896023001010
- Gendreau, P. (1996b). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117–130). Sage.
- Gendreau, P. (2000). 1988 Margaret mead award address: Rational policies for reforming offenders. In M. McMahon (Ed.), Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections (pp. 329–338). American Correctional Association.
- Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1996). The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory (CPAI). University of New Brunswick.
- Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (2001). The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory-2000. University of New Brunswick.
- Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Annis, H. (1990). Survey of existing substance abuse programs. Forum on Corrections Research, 2(4), 6–8.
- Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34(4), 575–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x
- Holsinger, A. M. (1999). Opening the “black box”: Assessing the relationship between program integrity and recidivism [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Cincinnati.
- Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-3541-7
- Latessa, E., Lovins, B., & Lux, J. (2018). The Ohio Risk Assessment System. In J. P. Singh, D. G. Kroner, S. Wormith, S. L. Desmarasis, & Z. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of recidivism risk/needs assessment tool (pp. 147–164). John Wiley.
- Latessa, E., Lemke, R., Makarios, M., Smith, P., & Lowenkamp, C. (2010). The creation and validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS). Federal Probation, 74(1), 16–22. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/74_1_2_0.pdf
- Latessa, E. J., Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2002). Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 66(2), 43–49. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/66_2_6_0.pdf
- Lipsey, M. (1999). Can intervention rehabilitate serious delinquents? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 564(1), 142–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956400109
- Loughran, T. A., Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C. A., Fagan, J., Piquero, A. R., & Losoya, S. H. (2009). Estimating a dose-response relationship between length of stay and future recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 47(3), 699–740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00165.x
- Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. (2002). Evaluation of Ohio’s community-based and half-way house programs: Final report. University of Cincinnati, School of Criminal Justice. https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ccjr/docs/reports/project_reports/2010%20ODRC%20HWH%20FINAL%20REPORT2.pdf
- Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders in 97 correctional programs. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281747
- Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective interventions. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(3), 575–594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00388.x
- Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35( Spring), 22–54. https://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/what-works-questions-and-answers-about-prison-reform
- National Research Council. (2014) . The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. The National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18613/the-growth-of-incarceration-in-the-united-states-exploring-causes
- Nesovic, A. (2003). Psychometric evaluation of the correctional program assessment inventory (CPAI) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Carleton University.
- Palmer, T. (1995). Programmatic and nonprogrammatic aspects of successful intervention: New directions for research. Crime & Delinquency, 41(1), 100–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128795041001006
- Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Sage.
- Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 17, pp. 281–335). University of Chicago Press.
- Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systemic approach (7th ed.). Sage.
- Sperber, K. G., Latessa, E. J., & Makarios, M. D. (2013a). Examining the interaction between level of risk and dosage of treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(3), 338–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812467942
- Sperber, K. G., Latessa, E. J., & Makarios, M. D. (2013b). Establishing a risk-dosage research agenda: Implications. Justice Research and Policy, 15(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.15.1.2013.123
- Taxman, F. S., Perdoni, M., & Harrison, L. (2007). Drug treatment services for adult offenders: The state of the state. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.019
- Taxman, F. S., ., & Smith, L. (2021, July–August). Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) classification models: Still evolving. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 59, A101459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101459
- Thanner, M., & Taxman, F. S. (2003). Responsivity: The value of providing intensive services to high-risk offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00352-5
- Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., & Lipton, D. S. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001006