References
- Andrews, D., & Dowden, C. (2006). The risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X05282556
- Andrews, D. A., & Kiessling, J. J. (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices: A summary of the CaVic research. In R. R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 441–463). Butterworths.
- Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI–R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
- Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 8(3), 369–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x
- Bechtel, K. (2015). Substance abuse program outcome evaluation for the Kansas Department of Corrections. Unpublished technical report.
- Bonta, J. (2002). Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 355–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854802029004002
- Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L., & Li, J. (2010). The strategic training initiative in community supervision: Risk-Need-Responsivity in the real world (User Report 2010-01). Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
- Bourgon, G., & Armstrong, B. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804270618
- Clear, T. R., & Frost, N. A. (2014). The punishment imperative: The rise and failure of mass incarceration in America. New York University Press.
- Cullen, F. T. (2005). The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference. Criminology, 43(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00001.x
- Cullen, F. T., & Gilbert, K. E. (1982). Reaffirming rehabilitation. Anderson.
- Cullen, F. T., & Gilbert, K. E. (2013). Reaffirming rehabilitation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. (1999). What works in young offender treatment: A meta-analysis. Forum on Correctional Research, 11(2), 21–24. https://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/research/forum/e112/112e_e.pdf
- Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. (2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(4), 449–467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.42.4.449
- Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03257765
- Duriez, S., Sullivan, C., Latessa, E., & Brusman Lovins, L. (2018). The evolution of correctional program assessment in the age of evidence-based practices. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 3(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1343104
- Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117–130). Sage Publications.
- Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. (1989). Correctional Program Assessment Inventory (CPAI). University of New Brunswick Press.
- Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34(4), 575–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x
- Glaze, L., & Bonczar, T. (2011). Probation and parole in the United States, 2010. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- Izzo, R., & Ross, R. (1990). Meta-analysis of rehabilitation programs for juvenile delinquents: A brief report. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 134–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001008
- Kaeble, D., & Alper, M. (2020). Probation and parole in the United States, 2017-2018. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- Landenberger, N., & Lipsey, M. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-3541-7
- Latessa, E., Brusman-Lovins, L., & Smith, P. (2010). Follow-up evaluation of Ohio’s community based correctional facility and halfway house programs—Outcome study. University of Cincinnati. Division of Criminal Justice, Center for Criminal Justice Research.
- Latessa, E., Lemke, R., Makarios, M., Smith, P., & Lowenkamp, C. (2010). The creation and validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS). Federal Probation, 74(1), 16–22. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/74_1_2_0.pdf
- Latessa, E. J. (2004). The challenge of change: Correctional programs and evidence-based practices. Criminology & Public Policy, 3(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2004.tb00061.x
- Latessa, E. J. (2018). The treatment quality matter? Of course it does, and there is growing evidence to support it. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12339
- Latessa, E. J., Cullen, F. T. & Gendreau, P. (2002). Beyond correctional quackery--Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 66(2), 43–49.
- Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. (1998). The importance of evaluating correctional programs: Assessing outcome and quality. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2(4), 22–29.
- Latessa, E. J., & Lovins, B. (2010). The role of offender risk assessment: A policy maker guide. Victims & Offenders, 5(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2010.485900
- Latessa, E. J., & Lovins, B. K. (2019). Corrections in the community (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Latessa, E. J., Lovins, B. K., & Ostrowski, K. (2009). The Ohio Youth Assessment System: Final report. University of Cincinnati, Division of Criminal Justice, Center for Criminal Justice Research.
- Latessa, E. J., Smith, P., Lemke, R., Makarios, M. & Lowenkamp, C. (2009). Creation and validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System: Final report. University of Cincinnati, Division of Criminal Justice, Center for Criminal Justice Research.
- Latessa, E. J., Smith, P., Schweitzer, M., & Labrecque, R. (2013). Evaluation of the Effective Practices in Community Supervision model (EPICS) in Ohio: Draft report. University of Cincinnati, Division of Criminal Justice, Center for Criminal Justice Research.
- Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 113–336). Sage Publications.
- Lipsey, M. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic review. Victims & Offenders, 4(2), 124–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573
- Losel, F. (1995). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 79–111). John Wiley & Sons.
- Lovins, B. K., Cullen, F. T., Latessa, E. J., & Jonson, C. L. (2018). Probation officer as a coach: Building a new professional identity. Federal Probation, 82(1), 13–19. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/82_1_2_0.pdf
- Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. (2002). Evaluation of Ohio’s community-based and half-way house programs: Final report. Division of Criminal Justice, Center for Criminal Justice Research.
- Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low-risk offenders [Technical report]. In the National Institute of Corrections (Ed.), Topics in community corrections, Annual issue 2004: Assessment issues for managers (pp. 3–8). U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
- Makarios, M., Lovins, L., Latessa, E., & Smith, P. (2016). Staff quality and treatment effectiveness: An examination of the relationship between staff factors and the effectiveness of correctional programs. Justice Quarterly, 33(2), 348–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.924546
- Makarios, M., Sperber, K. G., & Latessa, E. J. (2014). Treatment dosage and the risk principle: A refinement and extension. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(1), 334–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2014.922157
- Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35(Spring), 22–54.
- Maruschak, L. M., & Minton, T. D. (2020). Correctional populations in the United States, 2017–2018. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- McGuire, J. (2002). Criminal sanctions versus psychologically-based interventions with offenders: A comparative empirical analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160208415005
- Moore, L. D., & Elkavich, A. (2008). Who’s using and who’s doing time: Incarceration, the war on drugs, and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 98(S1), S176–S180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.98.Supplement_1.S176
- Pearson, F., Lipton, D., Cleland, C., & Yee, D. (2002). The effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioral programs on recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 48(3), 476–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001112870204800306
- Petersilia, J. (1998). A decade of experimenting with intermediate sanctions: What have we learned? Federal Probation, 62(2), 3–10. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/62_2_1_0.pdf
- Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole: Results of a nationwide experiment. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
- Phelps, M. S. (2017). Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishment & Society, 19(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516649174
- Robinson, C. R., Vanbenschoten, S., Alexander, M., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2011). A random (almost) study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-Arrest (STARR): Reducing recidivism through intentional design. Federal Probation, 75(2), 57–63. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/75_2_10_0.pdf
- Smith, P., Schweitzer, M., Labrecque, R. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2012). Improving probation officers’ supervision skills: An evaluation of the EPICS model. Journal of Crime & Justice, 35(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.674826
- Sperber, K. G., Latessa, E. J., & Makarios, M. D. (2013). Examining the interaction between level of risk and dosage of treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(3), 338–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812467942
- Spiegel, S., Lux, J., Schweitzer, M., & Latessa, E. (2018, March). Keeping kids close to home: Targeted RECLAIM 2014 and 2015 outcome evaluation. University of Cincinnati, Division of Criminal Justice, Center for Criminal Justice Research.
- Trotter, C. (1996). The impact of different supervision practices in community corrections: Cause for optimism. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 29(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000486589602900103
- University of Cincinnati Corrections Institute. (n.d.) . EPICS-I: Influencers. University of Cincinnati, School of Criminal Justice.
- Wilson, D., Bouffard, L. A., & MacKenzie, D. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(2), 172–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804272889
- Wodahl, E. J., & Garland, B. (2009). The evolution of community corrections: The enduring influence of the prison. The Prison Journal, 89(1), 81S–104S. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885508329775