Is Computer-based Communication A Valuable Addition to Victim-offender Mediation? A Qualitative Exploration among Victims, Offenders and Mediators

References

• Antonucci, T. C., Ajrouch, K. J., & Manalel, J. A. (2017). Social relations and technology: Continuity, context, and change. Innovation in Aging, 1(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltes, B. B., Dickson M. W., Dickson, M. P. Sherman M. P., Bauer C. C., & LaGanke J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banskota, S., Healy, M., & Goldberg, E. M. (2020). 15 smartphone apps for older adults to use while in isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(3), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, M. (2020). COVID-19 Pushes Up Internet Use 70% And Streaming More Than 12%, First Figures Reveal. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/markbeech/2020/03/25/covid-19-pushes-up-internet-use-70-streaming-more-than-12-first-figures-reveal/?sh=61ea02653104
   Google Scholar
• Berlo, D. (1960). The process of communication. Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Bolívar, D. (2013). For whom is restorative justice? Restorative Justice, 1(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.5235/20504721.1.2.190
   Google Scholar
• Bonensteffen, F., Zebel, S., & Giebels, E. (2020). Sincerity is in the eye of the beholder: Using eye tracking to understand how victims interpret an offender’s apology in a simulation of victim–offender mediation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00835
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J., Cooper, M., & Bergseth, K. (2017). The effectiveness of various restorative justice interventions on recidivism outcomes among juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016647428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, W., Roseborough, D., & Umbreit, M. S. (2006). The effect of victim offender mediation on juvenile offender recidivism: A meta-analysis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.159
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Analysing and presenting qualitative data. British Dental Journal, 204(8), 429–432. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. J., & Severson, M. (2009). Children and youth services review “ What ! What kind of apology is this? ”: The nature of apology in victim offender mediation. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(7), 813–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Jin Jung, Green, D. L., & Kapp, S. A. (2010). A qualitative study of victim offender mediation: Implications for social work. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20(7), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2010.494918
   Google Scholar
• Çiftçi, E. Y. (2016). A review of research on intercultural learning through computer-based digital technologies. Educational Technology and Society, 19(2), 313–327. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.2.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. (2017). An empirical note on perceptions of partial apologies. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 7(3), 408–420. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3029093
   Google Scholar
• Donthu, N., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effect of COVID-10 on business and research. Journal of Business Research, 117(6), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giebels, E., Ufkes, E. G., & van Erp, K. J. M. P. (2014). Understanding high-stakes conflicts. In N. Ashkanasy, O. B. Ayoko, & K. A. Jehn (Eds.), The handbook of research in conflict management (pp. 66–78). Edward Edgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2011). Political Ideology and reactions to crime victims: Preferences for restorative and punitive responses. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(4), 830–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01242.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. (2009). Technology assessment: Concepts and methods. In D. M. Gabbay, A. W. M. Meijers, J. Woods, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 1103–1146). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50044-6
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, A. J., Rawlings, J., Treger, S., & Sprecher, S. (2017). Channels of computer-mediated communication and satisfaction in long-distance relationships. Interpersona, 11(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v11i2.273
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Umbreit, M. (2018). State of knowledge: Four decades of victim-offender mediation research and practice: The evidence. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 36(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasu, M. (2000). Constructing clinical use: An activity-theoretical perspective on implementing new technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12(3), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320050130606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, H., & Snow, P. (2013). Oral language competence and restorative justice processes : refining preparation and the measurement of conference outcomes. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice [Electronic Resource], (463), 1–7. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20140310
   Google Scholar
• Jonas-van dijk, J., Zebel, S., Zebel, S., & Nelen, H. (2020). Victim-offender mediation and reduced reoffending: Gauging the self-selection bias. Crime and Delinquency, 66(6–7), 949–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719854348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khilnani, A., Schulz, J., & Robinson, L. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: New concerns and connections between eHealth and digital inequalities. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(3), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2020-0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koudenburg, N., Postmes, T., & Gordijn, E. H. (2017). Beyond content of conversation: The role of conversational form in the emergence and regulation of social structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315626022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, P. (2017). the literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communications in society. In B. Lyman (Ed.), The communication of ideas. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505276969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life – How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P.et al (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In G. Mey, and K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 601–613). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson, M. J., & Vidgen, R. (2016). A computational literature review of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1248–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mýlek, V., Dedkova, L., & Machackova, H. (2020). Factors influencing interactions between adolescents and unknown people from the internet: Findings from five European countries. Children and Youth Services Review, 114(12), 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105038
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, L. (2020). The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the digital transformation of work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, N. (2008). Towards understanding the role of emotions in conflict: A review and future directions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(4), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060810909301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, W. R., Umbreit, M. S., Wiinamaki, L., & Paddock, J. (2001). Participation in victim-offender mediation and reoffense: Successful replications? Research on Social Work Practice, 11(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973150101100101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce-López, V., Escalera, S., Pérez, M., Janés, O., & Baró, X. (2015). Non-verbal communication analysis in victim – offender mediations. Pattern Recognition Letters, 67, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.07.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, L., & McGuigan, N. (2021). Teaching, virtually: A critical reflection. Accounting Research Journal, 34(3), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2020-0307
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads, M. (2010). Face-to-face and computer-mediated communication: What does theory tell us and what have we learned so far? Journal of Planning Literature, 25(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412210382984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Chapman, B., Dignan, J., Howes, M., & Sorsby, A. (2007). Restorative justice: The views of victims and offenders. The Third Report from the Evaluation of Three Schemes. Ministry of Justice Research Series, 3(7), 1–60. Ministry of Justice. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090215213550/ http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/Restorative-Justice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2015). The role of agency and morality in reconciliation processes: The perspective of the needs-based model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415601625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaab, R. I., Galinsky, A. D., Medvec, V., & Diermeier, D. A. (2012). The communication orientation model: Explaining the diverse effects of sight, sound, and synchronicity on negotiation and group decision-making outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311417186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotter, R. T., II. (2012). Qualitative research sample design and sample size: Resolving and unresolved issues and inferential imperatives. Preventive Medicine, 55(5), 398–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ufkes, E. G., Giebels, E., Otten, S., & van der Zee, K. I. (2012). The effectiveness of a mediation program in symmetrical versus asymmetrical neighbor-to-neighbor conflicts. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23(4), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061211267290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Lightfoot, E. (2005). Restorative justice in the twenty-first century: A social movement full of opportunities and pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89, 251–304. https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol89/iss2/3
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2020). Handbook of restorative practices second edition. https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/20-01146_Handbook_on_Restorative_Justice_Programmes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. L. Daly (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443–479). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Tang, K. (2020). Combating COVID-19: Health equity matters. Nature Medicine, 26(4), 458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0823-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wemmers, J.-A., & Canuto, M. (2002). Victims’ experiences with, expectations and perceptions of restorative justice: A critical review of the literature. Department of Justice Canada. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/victim/rr01_9/rr01_9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T. (2021). Digital project management: Rapid changes define new working environments. Journal of Business Strategy, ahead-of-print(ahead–of– print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-03-2021-0047
   Google Scholar
• Zebel, S., Schreurs, W., & Ufkes, E. G. (2017). Crime seriousness and participation in restorative justice: The role of time elapsed since the offense. Law and Human Behavior, 41(4), 385. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebel, S. (2012). Een quasi-experimenteel onderzoek naar de effecten van de Nederland slachtoffer-dadergesprekken [A quasi-experimental study into the effects of the Dutch victim-offender meetings]. In I. Weijers (Ed.), Bemiddeling na strafbare feiten: De Nederlandse slachtoffer-dadergesprekken [Mediation after punishable offences: The Dutch victim-offender meetings] (pp. 21–44).
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (2015). The little book of restorative justice: Revised and updated. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar