Motives for Punishing Powerful Vs. Powerless Offenders: The Mediating Role of Demonization

References

• Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon Press. 1907.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L. (1999). Evil is more than banal: Situationism and the concept of evil. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 994–1014. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blader, S. L., & Yap, A. J. (2016). Power, dishonesty, and justice. In J. W. van Prooijen & P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Cheating, corruption, and concealment (pp. 208–229). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boles, T., Croson, R., & Murnighan, K. (2000). Deception, retribution, and the negotiation process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(2), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, H. R., & Gelfand, M. (2010). Status and the evaluation of workplace deviance. Psychological Science, 21(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609356509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Pagliaro, S., & Ellemers, N. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., & Darley, J. M. (2008). Psychological aspects of retributive justice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 193–236). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté, S., Piff, P. K., & Willer, R. (2013). For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 490–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., Cullen, J. B., & Mathers, R. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(3), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854885012003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0302_28
   Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Beaumont, G., & de Tocqueville, A. (1833). On the penitentiary system in the United States and its application in France. Carey, Lea and Blanchard. ed. and trans. Francis Lieber.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labour in society. New York Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellard, J. H., Miller, C. D., Baumle, T., & Olson, J. M. (2002). Just world processes in demonizing. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 350–362). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., & Van den Bos, K. (2012). Morality in groups: On the social-regulatory functions of right and wrong. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(12), 878–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12001
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P., & Galinsky, A. D. (2019). Paradoxical effects of power on moral thinking: Why power both increases and decreases deontological and utilitarian moral decisions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617744022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fousiani, K., & Demoulin, S. (2019). The effects of group membership and perceived humanness of victims on motives for punishment and justice decisions. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 16(2), 224–244. doi:10.26262/hjp.v16i2.7897.
   Google Scholar
• Fousiani, K., Steinel, W., & Minnigh, P. A. (2021). Power asymmetry in negotiations: A comparison of collaborative versus competitive approach. International Journal of Conflict Management, 32(2), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-05-2020-0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fousiani, K., & Van Prooijen, J. W. (2019). Reactions to offenders: Psychological differences between beliefs vs. punishment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 894–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fousiani, K., & van Prooijen, J.-W. (2022a). Motives for punishing powerful vs. prestigious offenders: The moderating role of group identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12525
   Google Scholar
• Fousiani, K., & Van Prooijen, J. W. (2022b). Punishment reactions to powerful suspects: Comparing a corrupt” versus a “leniency” approach of power. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 230(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fousiani, K., Yzerbyt, V., Kteily, N. S., & Demoulin, S. (2019). Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 869–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragale, A. R., Rosen, B., Xu, C., & Merideth, I. (2009). The higher they are, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Magee, J. C. (2015). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 1. Attitudes and social cognition. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H., Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(5–6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<781::AID-EJSP960>3.0.CO;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). To escape blame, don’t be a hero—Be a victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2009). Retributive and restorative justice: Importance of crime severity and shared identity in people’s justice responses. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530802607662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, N. (2015). Dehumanization and intergroup relations. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. F. Dovidio, J. A. Simpson (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology. Volume 2: Group processes (pp. 295–314). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14342-011
   Google Scholar
• Kakkar, H., Sivanathan, N., & Gobel, M. S. (2020). Fall from grace: The role of dominance and prestige in the punishment of high-status actors. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 530–553. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1797). The metaphysics of morals. In H. Reiss (Ed.), Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Kant: Political writings (2nd enl ed., pp. 131–175). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karelaia, N., & Keck, S. (2013). When deviant leaders are punished more than non-leaders: The role of deviance severity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipnis, D. (1972). Does power corrupt? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, N., & Pickard, H. (2015). To Blame or to forgive? Reconciling punishment and forgiveness in criminal justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 35(4), 665–696. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqv012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Dubois, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2015). Power and morality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinksy, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21(5), 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez, R. T., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez, A. P., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The role of secondary emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyens, J. P., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1992). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(6), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., Leidner, B., & Castano, E. (2014). Toward a comprehensive taxonomy of dehumanization: Integrating two senses of humanness, mind perception theory, and stereotype content model. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.3.4
   Google Scholar
• Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy the self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intragroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C. (2021). Perceived blameworthiness and punitiveness towards government officials and corporate executives in state-corporate crime cases. State Crime Journal, 9(2), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.9.2.0225
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 23, pp. 1–24). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otten, S. (2009). Social categorization, intergroup emotions, and aggressive interactions. In Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 162–181). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.549
   Google Scholar
• Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2006). Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliaro, S., Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., D’Angelo, M., & Ellemers, N. (2013). Initial impressions determine behaviours: Morality predicts the willingness to help newcomers. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1508-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(11), 4086–4091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118373109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2013). Masters of the universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Rath, R. (2008). Making a virtue of evil: A five‐step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1313–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00113.x
   Google Scholar
• Saleilles, R. (1898). L’individualisation de la peine. Etude de criminalité sociale.
   Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., & Scheepers, D. (2012). The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity vs. responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., Scheepers, D., & Scholl, A. (2014). Power corrupts” revisited: The role of construal of power as opportunity or responsibility. In J.-W. van Prooijen & P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 73–87). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, A., Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., Scheepers, D., & de Wit, F. (2018). Highly identified power-holders feel responsible: The interplay between social identification and social power within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 112–129. Epub 2017 Oct 6. PMID: 28983928. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. M., & Doria, J. R. (1981). Self-serving and group-serving bias in attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1981.9924371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. G., Scheppele, K. L., & Stinchcombe, A. L. (1979). Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions. Social Problems, 26(4), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.2307/800505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W., & Foster, S. C. (1975). A sociological perspective on public support for capital punishment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45(4), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1975.tb01192.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1997). The Psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to Authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Prooijen, J. W. (2006). Retributive reactions to suspected offenders: The importance of social categorizations and guilt probability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(6), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). The moral punishment instinct. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Prooijen, J. W., & Van de Veer, E. (2010). Perceiving pure evil: The influence of cognitive load and prototypical evilness on demonizing. Social Justice Research, 23(4), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0119-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidmar, N. (2000). Retribution and revenge. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 31–63). Kluwer/Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1946). Bureaucracy. In H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), Max Weber: Essays in sociology (p. 490). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32(5), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., & Thielmann, I. (2006). Why we punish in the name of justice: Just desert versus value restoration and the role of social identity. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0028-2
   Google Scholar
• Yzerbyt, V. Y., Leyens, J.-P., & Bellour, F. (1995). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Identity concerns in decisions about group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (1997). Restorative Justice: The Concept. Corrections Today, 59(7), 68–70. http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=169515
   Google Scholar